Component comparison
GeForce RTX 4080 vs Quadro T1000
GeForce RTX 4080 vs Quadro T1000 — detailed GPU comparison: performance, gaming FPS, specifications.
Advantages
A
GeForce RTX 4080
- + Release year (+4)
- + VRAM (GB) (+8 GB)
- + Memory bus (bit) (+128 bit)
- + TGP / TDP (W) (+60 W)
- + Lithography (nm) (-8 nm)
- + CUDA cores (+8960)
- + Energy efficiency (+17.6)
- + PassMark (overall) (+18240)
- + Normalized score (+26.9)
B
Quadro T1000
- + Memory clock (MHz) (+5750 MHz)
Detailed spec comparison
| Spec |
Component A
GeForce RTX 4080
|
Component B
Quadro T1000
|
|---|---|---|
| Release year | 2023 (+4) | 2019 |
| VRAM (GB) | 12 GB (+8 GB) | 4 GB |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Memory clock (MHz) | 2250 MHz | 8000 MHz (+5750 MHz) |
| Bandwidth (GB/s) | 716 GB/s | — |
| Memory bus (bit) | 256 bit (+128 bit) | 128 bit |
| TGP / TDP (W) | 110 W (+60 W) | 50 W |
| Lithography (nm) | 4 nm (-8 nm) | 12 nm |
| Transistors (M) | 45,900M | — |
| Die size (mm²) | 379 mm² | — |
| Base clock (MHz) | — | — |
| Boost clock (MHz) | — | 1455 MHz |
| CUDA cores | 9,728 (+8960) | 768 |
| TMUs | 304 | — |
| ROPs | 112 | — |
| RT cores | 76 | — |
| Tensor cores | 304 | — |
| FP32 performance (TFLOPS) | 48.74 TFLOPS | — |
| Pixel fill rate (GPixel/s) | 280.60 GPixel/s | — |
| Texture fill rate (GTexel/s) | 761.50 GTexel/s | — |
| Energy efficiency | 41.8 (+17.6) | 24.1 |
| PassMark (overall) | 24,753 (+18240) | 6,513 |
| 3DMark Time Spy | 18,534 | — |
| 3DMark Fire Strike | 41,431 | — |
| Geekbench OpenCL | — | 33,850 |
| Geekbench Vulkan | — | 29,725 |
| Normalized score | 72.8 (+26.9) | 45.9 |
Only in component A
DLSS
ReBAR
ray_tracing
In both
CUDA
FPS in games (1080p)
| Game | GeForce RTX 4080 | Quadro T1000 | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|
| Battlefield 5 | 160 FPS | 38 FPS | +321.1% (A) |
| Borderlands 3 | 158 FPS | 38 FPS | +315.8% (A) |
| CS:GO | 240 FPS | 240 FPS | ≈ |
| Control | 157 FPS | 31 FPS | +406.5% (A) |
| Dota 2 | 178 FPS | 113 FPS | +57.5% (A) |
| Escape from Tarkov | 120 FPS | 68 FPS | +76.5% (A) |
| Far Cry 5 | 171 FPS | 57 FPS | +200% (A) |
| Final Fantasy XV Benchmark | 129 FPS | 31 FPS | +316.1% (A) |
| GTA V | 140 FPS | 140 FPS | ≈ |
| GTA V | 165 FPS | 94 FPS | +75.5% (A) |
| Metro Exodus | 146 FPS | 32 FPS | +356.3% (A) |
| Overwatch | 240 FPS | 240 FPS | ≈ |
| PUBG | 140 FPS | 140 FPS | ≈ |
| Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 263 FPS | 40 FPS | +557.5% (A) |
| The Witcher 3 | 246 FPS | 53 FPS | +364.2% (A) |
| X-Plane 11.11 | 89 FPS | 57 FPS | +56.1% (A) |
Specs from public sources (PassMark, Geekbench). FPS measured at 1080p medium settings.
Based on the comparison:
GeForce RTX 4080 wins 9 of the comparable criteria.
The choice depends on your use case.
🤔 How to choose
Universal advice for any use case.
- Reliability vs price: reliability (median 50) ↔ price (median 385.1).
- Weight vs CPU: mobility (median 48) ↔ overall performance (median 49.8).
- Upgradeability vs battery: upgradability (median 50) ↔ battery life (median 2.8).