Component comparison
GeForce RTX 4080 vs GeForce MX350
GeForce RTX 4080 vs GeForce MX350 — detailed GPU comparison: performance, gaming FPS, specifications.
Advantages
A
GeForce RTX 4080
- + Release year (+3)
- + VRAM (GB) (+10 GB)
- + Memory clock (MHz) (+498 MHz)
- + Bandwidth (GB/s) (+660 GB/s)
- + Memory bus (bit) (+192 bit)
- + TGP / TDP (W) (+90 W)
- + Lithography (nm) (-10 nm)
- + Transistors (M) (+42,600M)
- + CUDA cores (+9088)
- + TMUs (+272)
- + ROPs (+96)
- + FP32 performance (TFLOPS) (+47.54 TFLOPS)
- + Pixel fill rate (GPixel/s) (+257.11 GPixel/s)
- + Texture fill rate (GTexel/s) (+714.52 GTexel/s)
- + Energy efficiency (+15.6)
- + PassMark (overall) (+21935)
- + 3DMark Time Spy (+17198)
- + 3DMark Fire Strike (+37060)
- + Normalized score (+42.0)
B
GeForce MX350
- + Die size (mm²) (+247 mm²)
Detailed spec comparison
| Spec |
Component A
GeForce RTX 4080
|
Component B
GeForce MX350
|
|---|---|---|
| Release year | 2023 (+3) | 2020 |
| VRAM (GB) | 12 GB (+10 GB) | 2 GB |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Memory clock (MHz) | 2250 MHz (+498 MHz) | 1752 MHz |
| Bandwidth (GB/s) | 716 GB/s (+660 GB/s) | 56 GB/s |
| Memory bus (bit) | 256 bit (+192 bit) | 64 bit |
| TGP / TDP (W) | 110 W (+90 W) | 20 W |
| Lithography (nm) | 4 nm (-10 nm) | 14 nm |
| Transistors (M) | 45,900M (+42,600M) | 3,300M |
| Die size (mm²) | 379 mm² | 132 mm² (+247 mm²) |
| Base clock (MHz) | — | 1354 MHz |
| Boost clock (MHz) | — | 1468 MHz |
| CUDA cores | 9,728 (+9088) | 640 |
| TMUs | 304 (+272) | 32 |
| ROPs | 112 (+96) | 16 |
| RT cores | 76 | — |
| Tensor cores | 304 | — |
| FP32 performance (TFLOPS) | 48.74 TFLOPS (+47.54 TFLOPS) | 1.20 TFLOPS |
| Pixel fill rate (GPixel/s) | 280.60 GPixel/s (+257.11 GPixel/s) | 23.49 GPixel/s |
| Texture fill rate (GTexel/s) | 761.50 GTexel/s (+714.52 GTexel/s) | 46.98 GTexel/s |
| Energy efficiency | 41.8 (+15.6) | 26.1 |
| PassMark (overall) | 24,753 (+21935) | 2,818 |
| 3DMark Time Spy | 18,534 (+17198) | 1,336 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike | 41,431 (+37060) | 4,371 |
| Geekbench OpenCL | — | 13,112 |
| Geekbench Vulkan | — | 13,369 |
| Normalized score | 72.8 (+42.0) | 30.8 |
Only in component A
DLSS
ReBAR
ray_tracing
In both
CUDA
FPS in games (1080p)
| Game | GeForce RTX 4080 | GeForce MX350 | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|
| A Plague Tale Requiem | 98 FPS | 8 FPS | +1125% (A) |
| Armored Core 6 | 112 FPS | 10 FPS | +1020% (A) |
| Atomic Heart | 121 FPS | 7 FPS | +1628.6% (A) |
| Back 4 Blood | 295 FPS | 29 FPS | +917.2% (A) |
| Baldur's Gate 3 | 122 FPS | 11 FPS | +1009.1% (A) |
| Battlefield 5 | 160 FPS | 37 FPS | +332.4% (A) |
| Borderlands 3 | 158 FPS | 17 FPS | +829.4% (A) |
| CS:GO | 240 FPS | 240 FPS | ≈ |
| Call of Duty Modern Warfare 2 2022 | 149 FPS | 14 FPS | +964.3% (A) |
| Control | 157 FPS | 12 FPS | +1208.3% (A) |
| Counter-Strike 2 | 290 FPS | 66 FPS | +339.4% (A) |
| Counter-Strike 2 | 207 FPS | 31 FPS | +567.7% (A) |
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 149 FPS | 16 FPS | +831.3% (A) |
| Cyberpunk 2077 1.6 | 105 FPS | 6 FPS | +1650% (A) |
| Days Gone | 215 FPS | 24 FPS | +795.8% (A) |
| Dead Island 2 | 206 FPS | 21 FPS | +881% (A) |
| Deathloop | 129 FPS | 7 FPS | +1742.9% (A) |
| Diablo 4 | 322 FPS | 27 FPS | +1092.6% (A) |
| Dota 2 | 178 FPS | 83 FPS | +114.5% (A) |
| Elden Ring | 60 FPS | 15 FPS | +300% (A) |
| Escape from Tarkov | 120 FPS | 32 FPS | +275% (A) |
| F1 22 | 186 FPS | 20 FPS | +830% (A) |
| F1 23 | 227 FPS | 14 FPS | +1521.4% (A) |
| Far Cry 5 | 171 FPS | 27 FPS | +533.3% (A) |
| Far Cry 6 | 134 FPS | 11 FPS | +1118.2% (A) |
| Farming Simulator 22 | 217 FPS | 32 FPS | +578.1% (A) |
| Final Fantasy XV Benchmark | 129 FPS | 11 FPS | +1072.7% (A) |
| Fortnite | 270 FPS | 82 FPS | +229.3% (A) |
| Forza Horizon 4 | 230 FPS | 37 FPS | +521.6% (A) |
| Forza Horizon 5 | 249 FPS | 25 FPS | +896% (A) |
| GRID Legends | 199 FPS | 25 FPS | +696% (A) |
| GTA V | 140 FPS | 140 FPS | ≈ |
| GTA V | 165 FPS | 46 FPS | +258.7% (A) |
| Ghostwire Tokyo | 154 FPS | 15 FPS | +926.7% (A) |
| Lies of P | 226 FPS | 19 FPS | +1089.5% (A) |
| Mafia Definitive Edition | 171 FPS | 19 FPS | +800% (A) |
| Metro Exodus | 146 FPS | 12 FPS | +1116.7% (A) |
| Outriders | 151 FPS | 22 FPS | +586.4% (A) |
| Overwatch | 240 FPS | 240 FPS | ≈ |
| PUBG | 140 FPS | 140 FPS | ≈ |
| Rainbow Six Extraction | 272 FPS | 18 FPS | +1411.1% (A) |
| Ready or Not | 122 FPS | 32 FPS | +281.3% (A) |
| Resident Evil 4 Remake | 170 FPS | 18 FPS | +844.4% (A) |
| Resident Evil Village | 239 FPS | 14 FPS | +1607.1% (A) |
| Riders Republic | 169 FPS | 15 FPS | +1026.7% (A) |
| Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 263 FPS | 25 FPS | +952% (A) |
| Sons of the Forest | 75 FPS | 13 FPS | +476.9% (A) |
| The Callisto Protocol | 120 FPS | 10 FPS | +1100% (A) |
| The Finals | 171 FPS | 17 FPS | +905.9% (A) |
| The Quarry | 174 FPS | 11 FPS | +1481.8% (A) |
| The Witcher 3 | 334 FPS | 27 FPS | +1137% (A) |
| The Witcher 3 | 246 FPS | 21 FPS | +1071.4% (A) |
| The Witcher 3 v4 | 144 FPS | 7 FPS | +1957.1% (A) |
| Tiny Tina's Wonderlands | 167 FPS | 8 FPS | +1987.5% (A) |
| Total War Pharaoh | 192 FPS | 23 FPS | +734.8% (A) |
| Valorant | 300 FPS | 129 FPS | +132.6% (A) |
| Vampire Bloodhunt | 239 FPS | 35 FPS | +582.9% (A) |
| Watch Dogs Legion | 121 FPS | 13 FPS | +830.8% (A) |
| X-Plane 11.11 | 89 FPS | 30 FPS | +196.7% (A) |
Specs from public sources (PassMark, Geekbench). FPS measured at 1080p medium settings.
Based on the comparison:
GeForce RTX 4080 wins 19 of the comparable criteria.
The choice depends on your use case.
🤔 How to choose
Universal advice for any use case.
- Reliability vs price: reliability (median 50) ↔ price (median 385.1).
- Weight vs CPU: mobility (median 48) ↔ overall performance (median 49.8).
- Upgradeability vs battery: upgradability (median 50) ↔ battery life (median 2.8).