Component comparison

GeForce RTX 4080 vs GeForce GTX 1660 Ti

GeForce RTX 4080 vs GeForce GTX 1660 Ti — detailed GPU comparison: performance, gaming FPS, specifications.

Advantages

A GeForce RTX 4080
  • + Release year (+4)
  • + VRAM (GB) (+6 GB)
  • + Memory clock (MHz) (+750 MHz)
  • + Bandwidth (GB/s) (+428 GB/s)
  • + Memory bus (bit) (+64 bit)
  • + TGP / TDP (W) (+30 W)
  • + Lithography (nm) (-8 nm)
  • + Transistors (M) (+39,300M)
  • + CUDA cores (+8192)
  • + TMUs (+208)
  • + ROPs (+64)
  • + FP32 performance (TFLOPS) (+44.64 TFLOPS)
  • + Pixel fill rate (GPixel/s) (+195.64 GPixel/s)
  • + Texture fill rate (GTexel/s) (+591.60 GTexel/s)
  • + Energy efficiency (+16.9)
  • + PassMark (overall) (+12135)
  • + 3DMark Time Spy (+12875)
  • + 3DMark Fire Strike (+26613)
  • + Normalized score (+9.1)
B GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
  • + Die size (mm²) (+95 mm²)

Detailed spec comparison

Spec Component A
GeForce RTX 4080
Component B
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
Release year 2023 (+4) 2019
VRAM (GB) 12 GB (+6 GB) 6 GB
Memory type GDDR6 GDDR6
Memory clock (MHz) 2250 MHz (+750 MHz) 1500 MHz
Bandwidth (GB/s) 716 GB/s (+428 GB/s) 288 GB/s
Memory bus (bit) 256 bit (+64 bit) 192 bit
TGP / TDP (W) 110 W (+30 W) 80 W
Lithography (nm) 4 nm (-8 nm) 12 nm
Transistors (M) 45,900M (+39,300M) 6,600M
Die size (mm²) 379 mm² 284 mm² (+95 mm²)
Base clock (MHz) — —
Boost clock (MHz) — —
CUDA cores 9,728 (+8192) 1,536
TMUs 304 (+208) 96
ROPs 112 (+64) 48
RT cores 76 —
Tensor cores 304 —
FP32 performance (TFLOPS) 48.74 TFLOPS (+44.64 TFLOPS) 4.10 TFLOPS
Pixel fill rate (GPixel/s) 280.60 GPixel/s (+195.64 GPixel/s) 84.96 GPixel/s
Texture fill rate (GTexel/s) 761.50 GTexel/s (+591.60 GTexel/s) 169.90 GTexel/s
Energy efficiency 41.8 (+16.9) 24.9
PassMark (overall) 24,753 (+12135) 12,618
3DMark Time Spy 18,534 (+12875) 5,659
3DMark Fire Strike 41,431 (+26613) 14,818
Geekbench OpenCL — 60,911
Geekbench Vulkan — 58,130
Normalized score 72.8 (+9.1) 63.7

Only in component A

DLSS ReBAR ray_tracing

In both

CUDA

FPS in games (1080p)

Game GeForce RTX 4080 GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Delta
A Plague Tale Requiem 98 FPS 45 FPS +117.8% (A)
Alan Wake 2 77 FPS 30 FPS +156.7% (A)
Armored Core 6 112 FPS 64 FPS +75% (A)
Assassin's Creed Mirage 176 FPS 66 FPS +166.7% (A)
Atlas Fallen 115 FPS 74 FPS +55.4% (A)
Atomic Heart 121 FPS 50 FPS +142% (A)
Avatar Frontiers of Pandora 111 FPS 28 FPS +296.4% (A)
Back 4 Blood 295 FPS 126 FPS +134.1% (A)
Baldur's Gate 3 122 FPS 54 FPS +125.9% (A)
Battlefield 5 160 FPS 111 FPS +44.1% (A)
Borderlands 3 158 FPS 62 FPS +154.8% (A)
CS:GO 240 FPS 240 FPS ≈
Call of Duty Modern Warfare 3 2023 164 FPS 57 FPS +187.7% (A)
Company of Heroes 3 207 FPS 52 FPS +298.1% (A)
Control 157 FPS 51 FPS +207.8% (A)
Counter-Strike 2 290 FPS 147 FPS +97.3% (A)
Counter-Strike 2 207 FPS 104 FPS +99% (A)
Cyberpunk 2077 149 FPS 86 FPS +73.3% (A)
Cyberpunk 2077 1.6 105 FPS 54 FPS +94.4% (A)
Days Gone 215 FPS 83 FPS +159% (A)
Dead Island 2 206 FPS 86 FPS +139.5% (A)
Dead Space Remake 113 FPS 40 FPS +182.5% (A)
Deathloop 129 FPS 66 FPS +95.5% (A)
Diablo 4 322 FPS 113 FPS +185% (A)
Dota 2 178 FPS 121 FPS +47.1% (A)
Dying Light 2 141 FPS 40 FPS +252.5% (A)
EA Sports WRC 107 FPS 52 FPS +105.8% (A)
Elden Ring 60 FPS 57 FPS +5.3% (A)
Elex 2 119 FPS 53 FPS +124.5% (A)
Enshrouded 78 FPS 34 FPS +129.4% (A)
Escape from Tarkov 120 FPS 117 FPS +2.6% (A)
F1 22 186 FPS 117 FPS +59% (A)
F1 23 227 FPS 109 FPS +108.3% (A)
Far Cry 5 171 FPS 93 FPS +83.9% (A)
Far Cry 6 134 FPS 78 FPS +71.8% (A)
Farming Simulator 22 217 FPS 121 FPS +79.3% (A)
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark 129 FPS 55 FPS +134.5% (A)
Fortnite 270 FPS 120 FPS +125% (A)
Forza Horizon 4 230 FPS 134 FPS +71.6% (A)
Forza Horizon 5 249 FPS 107 FPS +132.7% (A)
GRID Legends 199 FPS 118 FPS +68.6% (A)
GTA V 140 FPS 140 FPS ≈
GTA V 165 FPS 124 FPS +33.1% (A)
Ghostwire Tokyo 154 FPS 89 FPS +73% (A)
God of War 138 FPS 52 FPS +165.4% (A)
Guardians of the Galaxy 165 FPS 72 FPS +129.2% (A)
Halo Infinite 209 FPS 70 FPS +198.6% (A)
High On Life 163 FPS 78 FPS +109% (A)
Hogwarts Legacy 134 FPS 48 FPS +179.2% (A)
Immortals of Aveum 84 FPS 44 FPS +90.9% (A)
Lies of P 226 FPS 77 FPS +193.5% (A)
Lords of the Fallen 91 FPS 30 FPS +203.3% (A)
Mafia Definitive Edition 171 FPS 67 FPS +155.2% (A)
Metro Exodus 146 FPS 54 FPS +170.4% (A)
Need for Speed Unbound 95 FPS 67 FPS +41.8% (A)
Outriders 151 FPS 84 FPS +79.8% (A)
Overwatch 240 FPS 240 FPS ≈
PUBG 140 FPS 140 FPS ≈
Palworld 134 FPS 55 FPS +143.6% (A)
Prince of Persia The Lost Crown 356 FPS 291 FPS +22.3% (A)
Rainbow Six Extraction 272 FPS 105 FPS +159% (A)
Ratchet & Clank Rift Apart 124 FPS 40 FPS +210% (A)
Ready or Not 122 FPS 101 FPS +20.8% (A)
Resident Evil 4 Remake 170 FPS 75 FPS +126.7% (A)
Resident Evil Village 239 FPS 99 FPS +141.4% (A)
Returnal 114 FPS 52 FPS +119.2% (A)
Riders Republic 169 FPS 55 FPS +207.3% (A)
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 263 FPS 114 FPS +130.7% (A)
Skull & Bones 115 FPS 55 FPS +109.1% (A)
Sons of the Forest 75 FPS 55 FPS +36.4% (A)
Spider-Man Miles Morales 103 FPS 76 FPS +35.5% (A)
Star Wars Jedi Survivor 106 FPS 39 FPS +171.8% (A)
Starfield 75 FPS 30 FPS +150% (A)
The Callisto Protocol 120 FPS 81 FPS +48.1% (A)
The Crew Motorfest 60 FPS 52 FPS +15.4% (A)
The Finals 171 FPS 99 FPS +72.7% (A)
The Last of Us 118 FPS 42 FPS +181% (A)
The Quarry 174 FPS 56 FPS +210.7% (A)
The Witcher 3 334 FPS 103 FPS +224.3% (A)
The Witcher 3 246 FPS 93 FPS +164.5% (A)
The Witcher 3 v4 144 FPS 43 FPS +234.9% (A)
Tiny Tina's Wonderlands 167 FPS 67 FPS +149.3% (A)
Total War Pharaoh 192 FPS 82 FPS +134.1% (A)
Uncharted Legacy of Thieves Collection 100 FPS 51 FPS +96.1% (A)
Valorant 300 FPS 209 FPS +43.5% (A)
Vampire Bloodhunt 239 FPS 124 FPS +92.7% (A)
Watch Dogs Legion 121 FPS 71 FPS +70.4% (A)
X-Plane 11.11 89 FPS 64 FPS +39.1% (A)

Specs from public sources (PassMark, Geekbench). FPS measured at 1080p medium settings.

Based on the comparison: GeForce RTX 4080 wins 19 of the comparable criteria. The choice depends on your use case.

🤔 How to choose

Universal advice for any use case.

  • Reliability vs price: reliability (median 50) ↔ price (median 385.1).
  • Weight vs CPU: mobility (median 48) ↔ overall performance (median 49.8).
  • Upgradeability vs battery: upgradability (median 50) ↔ battery life (median 2.8).