Component comparison
GeForce RTX 4080 vs GeForce GTX 1050 Ti
GeForce RTX 4080 vs GeForce GTX 1050 Ti — detailed GPU comparison: performance, gaming FPS, specifications.
Advantages
A
GeForce RTX 4080
- + Release year (+7)
- + VRAM (GB) (+8 GB)
- + Bandwidth (GB/s) (+604 GB/s)
- + Memory bus (bit) (+128 bit)
- + TGP / TDP (W) (+35 W)
- + Lithography (nm) (-10 nm)
- + Transistors (M) (+42,600M)
- + CUDA cores (+8960)
- + TMUs (+256)
- + ROPs (+80)
- + FP32 performance (TFLOPS) (+46.56 TFLOPS)
- + Pixel fill rate (GPixel/s) (+236.06 GPixel/s)
- + Texture fill rate (GTexel/s) (+694.68 GTexel/s)
- + Energy efficiency (+26.0)
- + PassMark (overall) (+18390)
- + 3DMark Time Spy (+16273)
- + 3DMark Fire Strike (+33946)
- + Normalized score (+32.0)
B
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti
- + Die size (mm²) (+247 mm²)
Detailed spec comparison
| Spec |
Component A
GeForce RTX 4080
|
Component B
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti
|
|---|---|---|
| Release year | 2023 (+7) | 2016 |
| VRAM (GB) | 12 GB (+8 GB) | 4 GB |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Memory clock (MHz) | 2250 MHz | — |
| Bandwidth (GB/s) | 716 GB/s (+604 GB/s) | 112 GB/s |
| Memory bus (bit) | 256 bit (+128 bit) | 128 bit |
| TGP / TDP (W) | 110 W (+35 W) | 75 W |
| Lithography (nm) | 4 nm (-10 nm) | 14 nm |
| Transistors (M) | 45,900M (+42,600M) | 3,300M |
| Die size (mm²) | 379 mm² | 132 mm² (+247 mm²) |
| Base clock (MHz) | — | — |
| Boost clock (MHz) | — | — |
| CUDA cores | 9,728 (+8960) | 768 |
| TMUs | 304 (+256) | 48 |
| ROPs | 112 (+80) | 32 |
| RT cores | 76 | — |
| Tensor cores | 304 | — |
| FP32 performance (TFLOPS) | 48.74 TFLOPS (+46.56 TFLOPS) | 2.18 TFLOPS |
| Pixel fill rate (GPixel/s) | 280.60 GPixel/s (+236.06 GPixel/s) | 44.54 GPixel/s |
| Texture fill rate (GTexel/s) | 761.50 GTexel/s (+694.68 GTexel/s) | 66.82 GTexel/s |
| Energy efficiency | 41.8 (+26.0) | 15.8 |
| PassMark (overall) | 24,753 (+18390) | 6,363 |
| 3DMark Time Spy | 18,534 (+16273) | 2,261 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike | 41,431 (+33946) | 7,485 |
| Geekbench OpenCL | — | 20,654 |
| Geekbench Vulkan | — | 19,790 |
| Normalized score | 72.8 (+32.0) | 40.8 |
Only in component A
DLSS
ReBAR
ray_tracing
In both
CUDA
FPS in games (1080p)
| Game | GeForce RTX 4080 | GeForce GTX 1050 Ti | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|
| Battlefield 5 | 160 FPS | 57 FPS | +180.7% (A) |
| Borderlands 3 | 158 FPS | 28 FPS | +464.3% (A) |
| CS:GO | 240 FPS | 240 FPS | ≈ |
| Control | 157 FPS | 22 FPS | +613.6% (A) |
| Counter-Strike 2 | 290 FPS | 70 FPS | +314.3% (A) |
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 149 FPS | 27 FPS | +451.9% (A) |
| Cyberpunk 2077 1.6 | 105 FPS | 17 FPS | +517.6% (A) |
| Deathloop | 129 FPS | 21 FPS | +514.3% (A) |
| Dota 2 | 178 FPS | 98 FPS | +81.6% (A) |
| Dying Light 2 | 141 FPS | 17 FPS | +729.4% (A) |
| Elden Ring | 60 FPS | 26 FPS | +130.8% (A) |
| Elex 2 | 119 FPS | 21 FPS | +466.7% (A) |
| Escape from Tarkov | 120 FPS | 45 FPS | +166.7% (A) |
| F1 22 | 186 FPS | 48 FPS | +287.5% (A) |
| Far Cry 5 | 171 FPS | 48 FPS | +256.3% (A) |
| Far Cry 6 | 134 FPS | 29 FPS | +362.1% (A) |
| Farming Simulator 22 | 217 FPS | 46 FPS | +371.7% (A) |
| Final Fantasy XV Benchmark | 129 FPS | 23 FPS | +460.9% (A) |
| Fortnite | 270 FPS | 75 FPS | +260% (A) |
| Forza Horizon 4 | 230 FPS | 67 FPS | +243.3% (A) |
| Forza Horizon 5 | 249 FPS | 40 FPS | +522.5% (A) |
| GRID Legends | 199 FPS | 42 FPS | +373.8% (A) |
| GTA V | 140 FPS | 140 FPS | ≈ |
| GTA V | 165 FPS | 60 FPS | +175% (A) |
| Ghostwire Tokyo | 154 FPS | 33 FPS | +366.7% (A) |
| God of War | 138 FPS | 12 FPS | +1050% (A) |
| Mafia Definitive Edition | 171 FPS | 33 FPS | +418.2% (A) |
| Metro Exodus | 146 FPS | 31 FPS | +371% (A) |
| Overwatch | 240 FPS | 240 FPS | ≈ |
| PUBG | 140 FPS | 140 FPS | ≈ |
| Rainbow Six Extraction | 272 FPS | 42 FPS | +547.6% (A) |
| Resident Evil 4 Remake | 170 FPS | 24 FPS | +608.3% (A) |
| Riders Republic | 169 FPS | 29 FPS | +482.8% (A) |
| Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 263 FPS | 31 FPS | +748.4% (A) |
| The Quarry | 174 FPS | 24 FPS | +625% (A) |
| The Witcher 3 | 334 FPS | 46 FPS | +626.1% (A) |
| The Witcher 3 | 246 FPS | 21 FPS | +1071.4% (A) |
| Tiny Tina's Wonderlands | 167 FPS | 24 FPS | +595.8% (A) |
| Valorant | 300 FPS | 110 FPS | +172.7% (A) |
| Vampire Bloodhunt | 239 FPS | 58 FPS | +312.1% (A) |
| Watch Dogs Legion | 121 FPS | 27 FPS | +348.1% (A) |
| X-Plane 11.11 | 89 FPS | 44 FPS | +102.3% (A) |
Specs from public sources (PassMark, Geekbench). FPS measured at 1080p medium settings.
Based on the comparison:
GeForce RTX 4080 wins 18 of the comparable criteria.
The choice depends on your use case.
🤔 How to choose
Universal advice for any use case.
- Reliability vs price: reliability (median 50) ↔ price (median 385.1).
- Weight vs CPU: mobility (median 48) ↔ overall performance (median 49.8).
- Upgradeability vs battery: upgradability (median 50) ↔ battery life (median 2.8).