Component comparison
GeForce RTX 4080 vs GeForce GTX 1050
GeForce RTX 4080 vs GeForce GTX 1050 — detailed GPU comparison: performance, gaming FPS, specifications.
Advantages
A
GeForce RTX 4080
- + Release year (+6)
- + VRAM (GB) (+10 GB)
- + Bandwidth (GB/s) (+604 GB/s)
- + Memory bus (bit) (+128 bit)
- + TGP / TDP (W) (+35 W)
- + Lithography (nm) (-10 nm)
- + Transistors (M) (+42,600M)
- + CUDA cores (+8960)
- + TMUs (+256)
- + ROPs (+88)
- + FP32 performance (TFLOPS) (+46.53 TFLOPS)
- + Pixel fill rate (GPixel/s) (+234.04 GPixel/s)
- + Texture fill rate (GTexel/s) (+703.30 GTexel/s)
- + Energy efficiency (+30.8)
- + PassMark (overall) (+19705)
- + 3DMark Fire Strike (+35363)
- + Normalized score (+41.5)
B
GeForce GTX 1050
- + Memory clock (MHz) (+4758 MHz)
- + Die size (mm²) (+247 mm²)
Detailed spec comparison
| Spec |
Component A
GeForce RTX 4080
|
Component B
GeForce GTX 1050
|
|---|---|---|
| Release year | 2023 (+6) | 2017 |
| VRAM (GB) | 12 GB (+10 GB) | 2 GB |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Memory clock (MHz) | 2250 MHz | 7008 MHz (+4758 MHz) |
| Bandwidth (GB/s) | 716 GB/s (+604 GB/s) | 112 GB/s |
| Memory bus (bit) | 256 bit (+128 bit) | 128 bit |
| TGP / TDP (W) | 110 W (+35 W) | 75 W |
| Lithography (nm) | 4 nm (-10 nm) | 14 nm |
| Transistors (M) | 45,900M (+42,600M) | 3,300M |
| Die size (mm²) | 379 mm² | 132 mm² (+247 mm²) |
| Base clock (MHz) | — | — |
| Boost clock (MHz) | — | — |
| CUDA cores | 9,728 (+8960) | 768 |
| TMUs | 304 (+256) | 48 |
| ROPs | 112 (+88) | 24 |
| RT cores | 76 | — |
| Tensor cores | 304 | — |
| FP32 performance (TFLOPS) | 48.74 TFLOPS (+46.53 TFLOPS) | 2.21 TFLOPS |
| Pixel fill rate (GPixel/s) | 280.60 GPixel/s (+234.04 GPixel/s) | 46.56 GPixel/s |
| Texture fill rate (GTexel/s) | 761.50 GTexel/s (+703.30 GTexel/s) | 58.20 GTexel/s |
| Energy efficiency | 41.8 (+30.8) | 11.0 |
| PassMark (overall) | 24,753 (+19705) | 5,048 |
| 3DMark Time Spy | 18,534 | — |
| 3DMark Fire Strike | 41,431 (+35363) | 6,068 |
| Geekbench OpenCL | — | 17,429 |
| Geekbench Vulkan | — | 15,766 |
| Normalized score | 72.8 (+41.5) | 31.3 |
Only in component A
DLSS
ReBAR
ray_tracing
In both
CUDA
FPS in games (1080p)
| Game | GeForce RTX 4080 | GeForce GTX 1050 | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|
| A Plague Tale Requiem | 98 FPS | 16 FPS | +512.5% (A) |
| Atlas Fallen | 115 FPS | 26 FPS | +342.3% (A) |
| Atomic Heart | 121 FPS | 20 FPS | +505% (A) |
| Back 4 Blood | 295 FPS | 40 FPS | +637.5% (A) |
| Baldur's Gate 3 | 122 FPS | 16 FPS | +662.5% (A) |
| Battlefield 5 | 160 FPS | 51 FPS | +213.7% (A) |
| Borderlands 3 | 158 FPS | 23 FPS | +587% (A) |
| CS:GO | 240 FPS | 240 FPS | ≈ |
| Call of Duty Modern Warfare 2 2022 | 149 FPS | 21 FPS | +609.5% (A) |
| Company of Heroes 3 | 207 FPS | 31 FPS | +567.7% (A) |
| Control | 157 FPS | 17 FPS | +823.5% (A) |
| Counter-Strike 2 | 290 FPS | 65 FPS | +346.2% (A) |
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 149 FPS | 24 FPS | +520.8% (A) |
| Cyberpunk 2077 1.6 | 105 FPS | 14 FPS | +650% (A) |
| Days Gone | 215 FPS | 32 FPS | +571.9% (A) |
| Dead Island 2 | 206 FPS | 34 FPS | +505.9% (A) |
| Dead Space Remake | 113 FPS | 11 FPS | +927.3% (A) |
| Diablo 4 | 322 FPS | 44 FPS | +631.8% (A) |
| Dota 2 | 178 FPS | 126 FPS | +41.3% (A) |
| Dying Light 2 | 141 FPS | 14 FPS | +907.1% (A) |
| Elden Ring | 60 FPS | 27 FPS | +122.2% (A) |
| Elex 2 | 119 FPS | 17 FPS | +600% (A) |
| Escape from Tarkov | 120 FPS | 54 FPS | +122.2% (A) |
| F1 22 | 186 FPS | 38 FPS | +389.5% (A) |
| F1 23 | 227 FPS | 36 FPS | +530.6% (A) |
| Far Cry 5 | 171 FPS | 39 FPS | +338.5% (A) |
| Far Cry 6 | 134 FPS | 24 FPS | +458.3% (A) |
| Farming Simulator 22 | 217 FPS | 44 FPS | +393.2% (A) |
| Final Fantasy XV Benchmark | 129 FPS | 18 FPS | +616.7% (A) |
| Fortnite | 270 FPS | 132 FPS | +104.5% (A) |
| Forza Horizon 4 | 230 FPS | 55 FPS | +318.2% (A) |
| Forza Horizon 5 | 249 FPS | 35 FPS | +611.4% (A) |
| GRID Legends | 199 FPS | 40 FPS | +397.5% (A) |
| GTA V | 140 FPS | 140 FPS | ≈ |
| GTA V | 165 FPS | 66 FPS | +150% (A) |
| God of War | 138 FPS | 16 FPS | +762.5% (A) |
| Guardians of the Galaxy | 165 FPS | 29 FPS | +469% (A) |
| Halo Infinite | 209 FPS | 25 FPS | +736% (A) |
| High On Life | 163 FPS | 27 FPS | +503.7% (A) |
| Hogwarts Legacy | 134 FPS | 17 FPS | +688.2% (A) |
| Mafia Definitive Edition | 171 FPS | 27 FPS | +533.3% (A) |
| Metro Exodus | 146 FPS | 19 FPS | +668.4% (A) |
| Need for Speed Unbound | 95 FPS | 23 FPS | +313% (A) |
| Outriders | 151 FPS | 27 FPS | +459.3% (A) |
| Overwatch | 240 FPS | 240 FPS | ≈ |
| PUBG | 140 FPS | 140 FPS | ≈ |
| Rainbow Six Extraction | 272 FPS | 36 FPS | +655.6% (A) |
| Ratchet & Clank Rift Apart | 124 FPS | 16 FPS | +675% (A) |
| Resident Evil 4 Remake | 170 FPS | 24 FPS | +608.3% (A) |
| Resident Evil Village | 239 FPS | 23 FPS | +939.1% (A) |
| Returnal | 114 FPS | 20 FPS | +470% (A) |
| Riders Republic | 169 FPS | 26 FPS | +550% (A) |
| Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 263 FPS | 39 FPS | +574.4% (A) |
| Sons of the Forest | 75 FPS | 21 FPS | +257.1% (A) |
| Spider-Man Miles Morales | 103 FPS | 29 FPS | +255.2% (A) |
| Star Wars Jedi Survivor | 106 FPS | 13 FPS | +715.4% (A) |
| The Callisto Protocol | 120 FPS | 27 FPS | +344.4% (A) |
| The Last of Us | 118 FPS | 12 FPS | +883.3% (A) |
| The Quarry | 174 FPS | 19 FPS | +815.8% (A) |
| The Witcher 3 | 334 FPS | 39 FPS | +756.4% (A) |
| The Witcher 3 | 246 FPS | 29 FPS | +748.3% (A) |
| The Witcher 3 v4 | 144 FPS | 32 FPS | +350% (A) |
| Tiny Tina's Wonderlands | 167 FPS | 19 FPS | +778.9% (A) |
| Uncharted Legacy of Thieves Collection | 100 FPS | 17 FPS | +488.2% (A) |
| Valorant | 300 FPS | 100 FPS | +200% (A) |
| Vampire Bloodhunt | 239 FPS | 50 FPS | +378% (A) |
| Watch Dogs Legion | 121 FPS | 22 FPS | +450% (A) |
| X-Plane 11.11 | 89 FPS | 45 FPS | +97.8% (A) |
Specs from public sources (PassMark, Geekbench). FPS measured at 1080p medium settings.
Based on the comparison:
GeForce RTX 4080 wins 17 of the comparable criteria.
The choice depends on your use case.
🤔 How to choose
Universal advice for any use case.
- Reliability vs price: reliability (median 50) ↔ price (median 385.1).
- Weight vs CPU: mobility (median 48) ↔ overall performance (median 49.8).
- Upgradeability vs battery: upgradability (median 50) ↔ battery life (median 2.8).