Component comparison

GeForce RTX 4070 vs RTX A500

GeForce RTX 4070 vs RTX A500 — detailed GPU comparison: performance, gaming FPS, specifications.

Advantages

A GeForce RTX 4070
  • + Release year (+2)
  • + VRAM (GB) (+4 GB)
  • + Memory clock (MHz) (+250 MHz)
  • + Bandwidth (GB/s) (+392 GB/s)
  • + Memory bus (bit) (+128 bit)
  • + TGP / TDP (W) (+55 W)
  • + Lithography (nm) (-3 nm)
  • + CUDA cores (+3840)
  • + TMUs (+120)
  • + ROPs (+32)
  • + RT cores (+30)
  • + Tensor cores (+120)
  • + FP32 performance (TFLOPS) (+21.90 TFLOPS)
  • + Energy efficiency (+11.2)
  • + PassMark (overall) (+12951)
  • + Normalized score (+68.6)
B RTX A500

Components are close in specs

Detailed spec comparison

Spec Component A
GeForce RTX 4070
Component B
RTX A500
Release year 2023 (+2) 2021
VRAM (GB) 8 GB (+4 GB) 4 GB
Memory type GDDR6 GDDR6
Memory clock (MHz) 2000 MHz (+250 MHz) 1750 MHz
Bandwidth (GB/s) 504 GB/s (+392 GB/s) 112 GB/s
Memory bus (bit) 192 bit (+128 bit) 64 bit
TGP / TDP (W) 115 W (+55 W) 60 W
Lithography (nm) 5 nm (-3 nm) 8 nm
Transistors (M) 35,800M —
Die size (mm²) 294 mm² —
Base clock (MHz) — —
Boost clock (MHz) — 1537 MHz
CUDA cores 5,888 (+3840) 2,048
TMUs 184 (+120) 64
ROPs 64 (+32) 32
RT cores 46 (+30) 16
Tensor cores 184 (+120) 64
FP32 performance (TFLOPS) 29.15 TFLOPS (+21.90 TFLOPS) 7.25 TFLOPS
Pixel fill rate (GPixel/s) 158.40 GPixel/s —
Texture fill rate (GTexel/s) 455.40 GTexel/s —
Energy efficiency 31.5 (+11.2) 20.2
PassMark (overall) 19,489 (+12951) 6,538
3DMark Time Spy 11,960 —
3DMark Fire Strike 30,051 —
Geekbench OpenCL 168,695 —
Geekbench Vulkan 159,285 —
Normalized score 84.5 (+68.6) 15.8

Only in component A

ray_tracing

In both

CUDA DLSS ReBAR

FPS in games (1080p)

Game GeForce RTX 4070 RTX A500 Delta
CS:GO 240 FPS 240 FPS ≈
GTA V 140 FPS 140 FPS ≈
Overwatch 240 FPS 240 FPS ≈
PUBG 140 FPS 140 FPS ≈

Specs from public sources (PassMark, Geekbench). FPS measured at 1080p medium settings.

Based on the comparison: GeForce RTX 4070 wins 16 of the comparable criteria. The choice depends on your use case.

🤔 How to choose

Universal advice for any use case.

  • Reliability vs price: reliability (median 50) ↔ price (median 385.1).
  • Weight vs CPU: mobility (median 48) ↔ overall performance (median 49.8).
  • Upgradeability vs battery: upgradability (median 50) ↔ battery life (median 2.8).