Component comparison
GeForce RTX 4070 vs GeForce RTX 5070
GeForce RTX 4070 vs GeForce RTX 5070 — detailed GPU comparison: performance, gaming FPS, specifications.
Advantages
A
GeForce RTX 4070
- + TGP / TDP (W) (+15 W)
- + Transistors (M) (+4,700M)
- + Energy efficiency (+10.2)
- + PassMark (overall) (+414)
- + Normalized score (+14.9)
B
GeForce RTX 5070
- + Release year (+2)
- + Bandwidth (GB/s) (+168 GB/s)
- + Lithography (nm) (-1 nm)
- + Die size (mm²) (+31 mm²)
- + CUDA cores (+256)
- + TMUs (+8)
- + ROPs (+16)
- + RT cores (+2)
- + Tensor cores (+8)
- + FP32 performance (TFLOPS) (+1.72 TFLOPS)
- + Pixel fill rate (GPixel/s) (+42.60 GPixel/s)
- + Texture fill rate (GTexel/s) (+26.90 GTexel/s)
- + 3DMark Fire Strike (+4898)
Detailed spec comparison
| Spec |
Component A
GeForce RTX 4070
|
Component B
GeForce RTX 5070
|
|---|---|---|
| Release year | 2023 | 2025 (+2) |
| VRAM (GB) | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR7 |
| Memory clock (MHz) | 2000 MHz | 2000 MHz |
| Bandwidth (GB/s) | 504 GB/s | 672 GB/s (+168 GB/s) |
| Memory bus (bit) | 192 bit | 192 bit |
| TGP / TDP (W) | 115 W (+15 W) | 100 W |
| Lithography (nm) | 5 nm | 4 nm (-1 nm) |
| Transistors (M) | 35,800M (+4,700M) | 31,100M |
| Die size (mm²) | 294 mm² | 263 mm² (+31 mm²) |
| Base clock (MHz) | — | — |
| Boost clock (MHz) | — | — |
| CUDA cores | 5,888 | 6,144 (+256) |
| TMUs | 184 | 192 (+8) |
| ROPs | 64 | 80 (+16) |
| RT cores | 46 | 48 (+2) |
| Tensor cores | 184 | 192 (+8) |
| FP32 performance (TFLOPS) | 29.15 TFLOPS | 30.87 TFLOPS (+1.72 TFLOPS) |
| Pixel fill rate (GPixel/s) | 158.40 GPixel/s | 201.00 GPixel/s (+42.60 GPixel/s) |
| Texture fill rate (GTexel/s) | 455.40 GTexel/s | 482.30 GTexel/s (+26.90 GTexel/s) |
| Energy efficiency | 31.5 (+10.2) | 21.3 |
| PassMark (overall) | 19,489 (+414) | 19,075 |
| 3DMark Time Spy | 11,960 | — |
| 3DMark Fire Strike | 30,051 | 34,949 (+4898) |
| Geekbench OpenCL | 168,695 | — |
| Geekbench Vulkan | 159,285 | — |
| Normalized score | 84.5 (+14.9) | 69.6 |
In both
CUDA
DLSS
ReBAR
ray_tracing
FPS in games (1080p)
| Game | GeForce RTX 4070 | GeForce RTX 5070 | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|
| Battlefield 5 | 140 FPS | 180 FPS | 28.6% (B) |
| CS:GO | 240 FPS | 240 FPS | ≈ |
| Counter-Strike 2 | 250 FPS | 300 FPS | 20% (B) |
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 135 FPS | 170 FPS | 25.9% (B) |
| Far Cry 5 | 139 FPS | 322 FPS | 131.7% (B) |
| Fortnite | 200 FPS | 300 FPS | 50% (B) |
| Forza Horizon 4 | 180 FPS | 270 FPS | 50% (B) |
| Forza Horizon 5 | 190 FPS | 329 FPS | 73.2% (B) |
| GTA V | 140 FPS | 140 FPS | ≈ |
| Metro Exodus | 111 FPS | 170 FPS | 53.2% (B) |
| Overwatch | 240 FPS | 240 FPS | ≈ |
| PUBG | 140 FPS | 140 FPS | ≈ |
| Resident Evil 4 Remake | 160 FPS | 210 FPS | 31.3% (B) |
| The Witcher 3 | 229 FPS | 436 FPS | 90.4% (B) |
| Valorant | 260 FPS | 400 FPS | 53.8% (B) |
Specs from public sources (PassMark, Geekbench). FPS measured at 1080p medium settings.
Based on the comparison:
GeForce RTX 5070 wins 13 of the comparable criteria.
The choice depends on your use case.
🤔 How to choose
Universal advice for any use case.
- Reliability vs price: reliability (median 50) ↔ price (median 385.1).
- Weight vs CPU: mobility (median 48) ↔ overall performance (median 49.8).
- Upgradeability vs battery: upgradability (median 50) ↔ battery life (median 2.8).