Component comparison
GeForce RTX 4070 vs GeForce RTX 2060
GeForce RTX 4070 vs GeForce RTX 2060 — detailed GPU comparison: performance, gaming FPS, specifications.
Advantages
A
GeForce RTX 4070
- + Release year (+4)
- + VRAM (GB) (+2 GB)
- + Memory clock (MHz) (+250 MHz)
- + Bandwidth (GB/s) (+168 GB/s)
- + Lithography (nm) (-7 nm)
- + Transistors (M) (+25,000M)
- + Die size (mm²) (+151 mm²)
- + CUDA cores (+3968)
- + TMUs (+64)
- + ROPs (+16)
- + RT cores (+16)
- + FP32 performance (TFLOPS) (+22.70 TFLOPS)
- + Pixel fill rate (GPixel/s) (+77.76 GPixel/s)
- + Texture fill rate (GTexel/s) (+253.80 GTexel/s)
- + Energy efficiency (+13.3)
- + PassMark (overall) (+5395)
- + 3DMark Time Spy (+5819)
- + 3DMark Fire Strike (+13720)
- + Geekbench OpenCL (+97283)
- + Geekbench Vulkan (+93427)
- + Normalized score (+18.1)
B
GeForce RTX 2060
- + Tensor cores (+56)
Detailed spec comparison
| Spec |
Component A
GeForce RTX 4070
|
Component B
GeForce RTX 2060
|
|---|---|---|
| Release year | 2023 (+4) | 2019 |
| VRAM (GB) | 8 GB (+2 GB) | 6 GB |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory clock (MHz) | 2000 MHz (+250 MHz) | 1750 MHz |
| Bandwidth (GB/s) | 504 GB/s (+168 GB/s) | 336 GB/s |
| Memory bus (bit) | 192 bit | 192 bit |
| TGP / TDP (W) | 115 W | 115 W |
| Lithography (nm) | 5 nm (-7 nm) | 12 nm |
| Transistors (M) | 35,800M (+25,000M) | 10,800M |
| Die size (mm²) | 294 mm² (+151 mm²) | 445 mm² |
| Base clock (MHz) | — | — |
| Boost clock (MHz) | — | — |
| CUDA cores | 5,888 (+3968) | 1,920 |
| TMUs | 184 (+64) | 120 |
| ROPs | 64 (+16) | 48 |
| RT cores | 46 (+16) | 30 |
| Tensor cores | 184 | 240 (+56) |
| FP32 performance (TFLOPS) | 29.15 TFLOPS (+22.70 TFLOPS) | 6.45 TFLOPS |
| Pixel fill rate (GPixel/s) | 158.40 GPixel/s (+77.76 GPixel/s) | 80.64 GPixel/s |
| Texture fill rate (GTexel/s) | 455.40 GTexel/s (+253.80 GTexel/s) | 201.60 GTexel/s |
| Energy efficiency | 31.5 (+13.3) | 18.1 |
| PassMark (overall) | 19,489 (+5395) | 14,094 |
| 3DMark Time Spy | 11,960 (+5819) | 6,141 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike | 30,051 (+13720) | 16,331 |
| Geekbench OpenCL | 168,695 (+97283) | 71,412 |
| Geekbench Vulkan | 159,285 (+93427) | 65,858 |
| Normalized score | 84.5 (+18.1) | 66.4 |
Only in component A
ReBAR
In both
CUDA
DLSS
ray_tracing
FPS in games (1080p)
| Game | GeForce RTX 4070 | GeForce RTX 2060 | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|
| Anno 1800 | 92 FPS | 61 FPS | +50.8% (A) |
| Battlefield 5 | 140 FPS | 104 FPS | +34.6% (A) |
| Borderlands 3 | 107 FPS | 61 FPS | +75.4% (A) |
| CS:GO | 240 FPS | 240 FPS | ≈ |
| Counter-Strike 2 | 250 FPS | 150 FPS | +66.7% (A) |
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 135 FPS | 60 FPS | +125% (A) |
| Days Gone | 155 FPS | 87 FPS | +78.2% (A) |
| Dota 2 | 178 FPS | 118 FPS | +50.8% (A) |
| Escape from Tarkov | 120 FPS | 121 FPS | 0.8% (B) |
| F1 2020 | 228 FPS | 126 FPS | +81% (A) |
| F1 2021 | 163 FPS | 126 FPS | +29.4% (A) |
| Far Cry 5 | 139 FPS | 96 FPS | +44.8% (A) |
| Far Cry New Dawn | 102 FPS | 77 FPS | +32.5% (A) |
| Final Fantasy XV Benchmark | 41 FPS | 52 FPS | 26.8% (B) |
| Flight Simulator 2020 | 83 FPS | 42 FPS | +97.6% (A) |
| Fortnite | 200 FPS | 162 FPS | +23.5% (A) |
| Forza Horizon 4 | 180 FPS | 108 FPS | +66.7% (A) |
| Forza Horizon 5 | 190 FPS | 100 FPS | +90% (A) |
| GTA V | 140 FPS | 140 FPS | ≈ |
| GTA V | 134 FPS | 95 FPS | +41.1% (A) |
| Hitman 3 | 208 FPS | 105 FPS | +98.1% (A) |
| Horizon Zero Dawn | 143 FPS | 67 FPS | +113.4% (A) |
| Metro Exodus | 111 FPS | 56 FPS | +98.2% (A) |
| Monster Hunter World | 169 FPS | 90 FPS | +87.8% (A) |
| Outriders | 145 FPS | 90 FPS | +61.1% (A) |
| Overwatch | 240 FPS | 240 FPS | ≈ |
| PUBG | 140 FPS | 140 FPS | ≈ |
| Resident Evil 4 Remake | 160 FPS | 65 FPS | +146.2% (A) |
| Resident Evil Village | 212 FPS | 95 FPS | +123.2% (A) |
| Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 149 FPS | 122 FPS | +22.1% (A) |
| The Witcher 3 | 229 FPS | 111 FPS | +106.3% (A) |
| The Witcher 3 | 124 FPS | 74 FPS | +67.6% (A) |
| Total War: Three Kingdoms | 133 FPS | 67 FPS | +98.5% (A) |
| Valorant | 260 FPS | 223 FPS | +16.6% (A) |
| Watch Dogs Legion | 130 FPS | 66 FPS | +97% (A) |
| X-Plane 11.11 | 52 FPS | 56 FPS | 7.7% (B) |
Specs from public sources (PassMark, Geekbench). FPS measured at 1080p medium settings.
Based on the comparison:
GeForce RTX 4070 wins 21 of the comparable criteria.
The choice depends on your use case.
🤔 How to choose
Universal advice for any use case.
- Reliability vs price: reliability (median 50) ↔ price (median 385.1).
- Weight vs CPU: mobility (median 48) ↔ overall performance (median 49.8).
- Upgradeability vs battery: upgradability (median 50) ↔ battery life (median 2.8).