Component comparison
GeForce RTX 4070 vs GeForce MX450
GeForce RTX 4070 vs GeForce MX450 — detailed GPU comparison: performance, gaming FPS, specifications.
Advantages
A
GeForce RTX 4070
- + Release year (+3)
- + VRAM (GB) (+6 GB)
- + Memory clock (MHz) (+750 MHz)
- + Bandwidth (GB/s) (+424 GB/s)
- + Memory bus (bit) (+128 bit)
- + TGP / TDP (W) (+90 W)
- + Lithography (nm) (-7 nm)
- + Transistors (M) (+31,100M)
- + CUDA cores (+4992)
- + TMUs (+120)
- + ROPs (+32)
- + FP32 performance (TFLOPS) (+25.92 TFLOPS)
- + Pixel fill rate (GPixel/s) (+108.00 GPixel/s)
- + Texture fill rate (GTexel/s) (+367.20 GTexel/s)
- + Energy efficiency (+3.9)
- + PassMark (overall) (+15775)
- + 3DMark Time Spy (+10060)
- + 3DMark Fire Strike (+25326)
- + Geekbench OpenCL (+140154)
- + Geekbench Vulkan (+131964)
- + Normalized score (+39.7)
B
GeForce MX450
- + Die size (mm²) (+94 mm²)
Detailed spec comparison
| Spec |
Component A
GeForce RTX 4070
|
Component B
GeForce MX450
|
|---|---|---|
| Release year | 2023 (+3) | 2020 |
| VRAM (GB) | 8 GB (+6 GB) | 2 GB |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5, GDDR6 |
| Memory clock (MHz) | 2000 MHz (+750 MHz) | 1250 MHz |
| Bandwidth (GB/s) | 504 GB/s (+424 GB/s) | 80 GB/s |
| Memory bus (bit) | 192 bit (+128 bit) | 64 bit |
| TGP / TDP (W) | 115 W (+90 W) | 25 W |
| Lithography (nm) | 5 nm (-7 nm) | 12 nm |
| Transistors (M) | 35,800M (+31,100M) | 4,700M |
| Die size (mm²) | 294 mm² | 200 mm² (+94 mm²) |
| Base clock (MHz) | — | 1395 MHz |
| Boost clock (MHz) | — | 1575 MHz |
| CUDA cores | 5,888 (+4992) | 896 |
| TMUs | 184 (+120) | 64 |
| ROPs | 64 (+32) | 32 |
| RT cores | 46 | — |
| Tensor cores | 184 | — |
| FP32 performance (TFLOPS) | 29.15 TFLOPS (+25.92 TFLOPS) | 3.23 TFLOPS |
| Pixel fill rate (GPixel/s) | 158.40 GPixel/s (+108.00 GPixel/s) | 50.40 GPixel/s |
| Texture fill rate (GTexel/s) | 455.40 GTexel/s (+367.20 GTexel/s) | 88.20 GTexel/s |
| Energy efficiency | 31.5 (+3.9) | 27.6 |
| PassMark (overall) | 19,489 (+15775) | 3,714 |
| 3DMark Time Spy | 11,960 (+10060) | 1,900 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike | 30,051 (+25326) | 4,725 |
| Geekbench OpenCL | 168,695 (+140154) | 28,541 |
| Geekbench Vulkan | 159,285 (+131964) | 27,321 |
| Normalized score | 84.5 (+39.7) | 44.7 |
Only in component A
DLSS
ReBAR
ray_tracing
In both
CUDA
FPS in games (1080p)
| Game | GeForce RTX 4070 | GeForce MX450 | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|
| Battlefield 5 | 140 FPS | 49 FPS | +185.7% (A) |
| CS:GO | 240 FPS | 240 FPS | ≈ |
| Counter-Strike 2 | 250 FPS | 88 FPS | +184.1% (A) |
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 135 FPS | 32 FPS | +321.9% (A) |
| Dota 2 | 178 FPS | 88 FPS | +102.3% (A) |
| Far Cry 5 | 139 FPS | 34 FPS | +308.8% (A) |
| Fortnite | 200 FPS | 61 FPS | +227.9% (A) |
| Forza Horizon 4 | 180 FPS | 35 FPS | +414.3% (A) |
| Forza Horizon 5 | 190 FPS | 34 FPS | +458.8% (A) |
| GTA V | 140 FPS | 140 FPS | ≈ |
| Metro Exodus | 111 FPS | 10 FPS | +1010% (A) |
| Overwatch | 240 FPS | 240 FPS | ≈ |
| PUBG | 140 FPS | 140 FPS | ≈ |
| Resident Evil 4 Remake | 160 FPS | 16 FPS | +900% (A) |
| The Witcher 3 | 229 FPS | 33 FPS | +593.9% (A) |
| Valorant | 260 FPS | 85 FPS | +205.9% (A) |
Specs from public sources (PassMark, Geekbench). FPS measured at 1080p medium settings.
Based on the comparison:
GeForce RTX 4070 wins 21 of the comparable criteria.
The choice depends on your use case.
🤔 How to choose
Universal advice for any use case.
- Reliability vs price: reliability (median 50) ↔ price (median 385.1).
- Weight vs CPU: mobility (median 48) ↔ overall performance (median 49.8).
- Upgradeability vs battery: upgradability (median 50) ↔ battery life (median 2.8).