Component comparison

GeForce RTX 4070 vs GeForce MX350

GeForce RTX 4070 vs GeForce MX350 — detailed GPU comparison: performance, gaming FPS, specifications.

Advantages

A GeForce RTX 4070
  • + Release year (+3)
  • + VRAM (GB) (+6 GB)
  • + Memory clock (MHz) (+248 MHz)
  • + Bandwidth (GB/s) (+448 GB/s)
  • + Memory bus (bit) (+128 bit)
  • + TGP / TDP (W) (+95 W)
  • + Lithography (nm) (-9 nm)
  • + Transistors (M) (+32,500M)
  • + CUDA cores (+5248)
  • + TMUs (+152)
  • + ROPs (+48)
  • + FP32 performance (TFLOPS) (+27.95 TFLOPS)
  • + Pixel fill rate (GPixel/s) (+134.91 GPixel/s)
  • + Texture fill rate (GTexel/s) (+408.42 GTexel/s)
  • + Energy efficiency (+5.3)
  • + PassMark (overall) (+16671)
  • + 3DMark Time Spy (+10624)
  • + 3DMark Fire Strike (+25680)
  • + Geekbench OpenCL (+155583)
  • + Geekbench Vulkan (+145916)
  • + Normalized score (+53.7)
B GeForce MX350
  • + Die size (mm²) (+162 mm²)

Detailed spec comparison

Spec Component A
GeForce RTX 4070
 Component B
GeForce MX350
Release year 2023 (+3) 2020
VRAM (GB) 8 GB (+6 GB) 2 GB
Memory type GDDR6 GDDR5
Memory clock (MHz) 2000 MHz (+248 MHz) 1752 MHz
Bandwidth (GB/s) 504 GB/s (+448 GB/s) 56 GB/s
Memory bus (bit) 192 bit (+128 bit) 64 bit
TGP / TDP (W) 115 W (+95 W) 20 W
Lithography (nm) 5 nm (-9 nm) 14 nm
Transistors (M) 35,800M (+32,500M) 3,300M
Die size (mm²) 294 mm² 132 mm² (+162 mm²)
Base clock (MHz) — 1354 MHz
Boost clock (MHz) — 1468 MHz
CUDA cores 5,888 (+5248) 640
TMUs 184 (+152) 32
ROPs 64 (+48) 16
RT cores 46 —
Tensor cores 184 —
FP32 performance (TFLOPS) 29.15 TFLOPS (+27.95 TFLOPS) 1.20 TFLOPS
Pixel fill rate (GPixel/s) 158.40 GPixel/s (+134.91 GPixel/s) 23.49 GPixel/s
Texture fill rate (GTexel/s) 455.40 GTexel/s (+408.42 GTexel/s) 46.98 GTexel/s
Energy efficiency 31.5 (+5.3) 26.1
PassMark (overall) 19,489 (+16671) 2,818
3DMark Time Spy 11,960 (+10624) 1,336
3DMark Fire Strike 30,051 (+25680) 4,371
Geekbench OpenCL 168,695 (+155583) 13,112
Geekbench Vulkan 159,285 (+145916) 13,369
Normalized score 84.5 (+53.7) 30.8

Only in component A

DLSS ReBAR ray_tracing

In both

CUDA

FPS in games (1080p)

Game GeForce RTX 4070 GeForce MX350 Delta
A Plague Tale Requiem 59 FPS 8 FPS +637.5% (A)
Anno 1800 92 FPS 19 FPS +384.2% (A)
Armored Core 6 91 FPS 10 FPS +810% (A)
Atomic Heart 86 FPS 7 FPS +1128.6% (A)
Back 4 Blood 221 FPS 29 FPS +662.1% (A)
Baldur's Gate 3 73 FPS 11 FPS +563.6% (A)
Battlefield 5 140 FPS 37 FPS +278.4% (A)
Borderlands 3 107 FPS 17 FPS +529.4% (A)
CS:GO 240 FPS 240 FPS ≈
Call of Duty Modern Warfare 2 2022 111 FPS 14 FPS +692.9% (A)
Counter-Strike 2 250 FPS 66 FPS +278.8% (A)
Counter-Strike 2 152 FPS 31 FPS +390.3% (A)
Cyberpunk 2077 135 FPS 16 FPS +743.8% (A)
Cyberpunk 2077 1.6 58 FPS 6 FPS +866.7% (A)
Days Gone 155 FPS 24 FPS +545.8% (A)
Dead Island 2 152 FPS 21 FPS +623.8% (A)
Deathloop 130 FPS 7 FPS +1757.1% (A)
Diablo 4 207 FPS 27 FPS +666.7% (A)
Dota 2 178 FPS 83 FPS +114.5% (A)
Elden Ring 60 FPS 15 FPS +300% (A)
Escape from Tarkov 120 FPS 32 FPS +275% (A)
F1 2020 228 FPS 33 FPS +590.9% (A)
F1 2021 163 FPS 31 FPS +425.8% (A)
F1 22 109 FPS 20 FPS +445% (A)
F1 23 153 FPS 14 FPS +992.9% (A)
Far Cry 5 139 FPS 27 FPS +414.8% (A)
Far Cry 6 105 FPS 11 FPS +854.5% (A)
Far Cry New Dawn 102 FPS 25 FPS +308% (A)
Farming Simulator 22 148 FPS 32 FPS +362.5% (A)
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark 41 FPS 11 FPS +272.7% (A)
Flight Simulator 2020 83 FPS 9 FPS +822.2% (A)
Fortnite 200 FPS 82 FPS +143.9% (A)
Forza Horizon 4 180 FPS 37 FPS +386.5% (A)
Forza Horizon 5 190 FPS 25 FPS +660% (A)
GRID Legends 126 FPS 25 FPS +404% (A)
GTA V 140 FPS 140 FPS ≈
GTA V 134 FPS 46 FPS +191.3% (A)
Ghostwire Tokyo 172 FPS 15 FPS +1046.7% (A)
Hitman 3 208 FPS 19 FPS +994.7% (A)
Horizon Zero Dawn 143 FPS 12 FPS +1091.7% (A)
Lies of P 150 FPS 19 FPS +689.5% (A)
Metro Exodus 111 FPS 12 FPS +825% (A)
Monster Hunter World 169 FPS 21 FPS +704.8% (A)
Outriders 145 FPS 22 FPS +559.1% (A)
Overwatch 240 FPS 240 FPS ≈
PUBG 140 FPS 140 FPS ≈
Rainbow Six Extraction 240 FPS 18 FPS +1233.3% (A)
Ready or Not 194 FPS 32 FPS +506.3% (A)
Resident Evil 4 Remake 160 FPS 18 FPS +788.9% (A)
Resident Evil Village 212 FPS 14 FPS +1414.3% (A)
Riders Republic 135 FPS 15 FPS +800% (A)
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 149 FPS 25 FPS +496% (A)
Sons of the Forest 72 FPS 13 FPS +453.8% (A)
The Callisto Protocol 112 FPS 10 FPS +1020% (A)
The Finals 168 FPS 17 FPS +888.2% (A)
The Quarry 122 FPS 11 FPS +1009.1% (A)
The Witcher 3 229 FPS 27 FPS +748.1% (A)
The Witcher 3 124 FPS 21 FPS +490.5% (A)
The Witcher 3 v4 101 FPS 7 FPS +1342.9% (A)
Tiny Tina's Wonderlands 74 FPS 8 FPS +825% (A)
Total War Pharaoh 137 FPS 23 FPS +495.7% (A)
Total War: Three Kingdoms 133 FPS 12 FPS +1008.3% (A)
Valorant 260 FPS 129 FPS +101.6% (A)
Vampire Bloodhunt 200 FPS 35 FPS +471.4% (A)
Watch Dogs Legion 130 FPS 13 FPS +900% (A)
X-Plane 11.11 52 FPS 30 FPS +73.3% (A)

Specs from public sources (PassMark, Geekbench). FPS measured at 1080p medium settings.

Based on the comparison: GeForce RTX 4070 wins 21 of the comparable criteria. The choice depends on your use case.

🤔 How to choose

Universal advice for any use case.

  • Reliability vs price: reliability (median 50) ↔ price (median 385.1).
  • Weight vs CPU: mobility (median 48) ↔ overall performance (median 49.8).
  • Upgradeability vs battery: upgradability (median 50) ↔ battery life (median 2.8).
All reviews