Component comparison
GeForce RTX 4070 vs GeForce GTX 1650
GeForce RTX 4070 vs GeForce GTX 1650 — detailed GPU comparison: performance, gaming FPS, specifications.
Advantages
A
GeForce RTX 4070
- + Release year (+3)
- + VRAM (GB) (+4 GB)
- + Memory clock (MHz) (+500 MHz)
- + Bandwidth (GB/s) (+376 GB/s)
- + Memory bus (bit) (+64 bit)
- + TGP / TDP (W) (+65 W)
- + Lithography (nm) (-7 nm)
- + Transistors (M) (+31,100M)
- + CUDA cores (+4864)
- + TMUs (+120)
- + ROPs (+32)
- + FP32 performance (TFLOPS) (+26.85 TFLOPS)
- + Pixel fill rate (GPixel/s) (+105.12 GPixel/s)
- + Texture fill rate (GTexel/s) (+362.16 GTexel/s)
- + Energy efficiency (+5.0)
- + PassMark (overall) (+12373)
- + 3DMark Time Spy (+8472)
- + 3DMark Fire Strike (+20738)
- + Geekbench OpenCL (+129542)
- + Geekbench Vulkan (+123037)
- + Normalized score (+31.1)
B
GeForce GTX 1650
- + Die size (mm²) (+94 mm²)
Detailed spec comparison
| Spec |
Component A
GeForce RTX 4070
|
Component B
GeForce GTX 1650
|
|---|---|---|
| Release year | 2023 (+3) | 2020 |
| VRAM (GB) | 8 GB (+4 GB) | 4 GB |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory clock (MHz) | 2000 MHz (+500 MHz) | 1500 MHz |
| Bandwidth (GB/s) | 504 GB/s (+376 GB/s) | 128 GB/s |
| Memory bus (bit) | 192 bit (+64 bit) | 128 bit |
| TGP / TDP (W) | 115 W (+65 W) | 50 W |
| Lithography (nm) | 5 nm (-7 nm) | 12 nm |
| Transistors (M) | 35,800M (+31,100M) | 4,700M |
| Die size (mm²) | 294 mm² | 200 mm² (+94 mm²) |
| Base clock (MHz) | — | — |
| Boost clock (MHz) | — | — |
| CUDA cores | 5,888 (+4864) | 1,024 |
| TMUs | 184 (+120) | 64 |
| ROPs | 64 (+32) | 32 |
| RT cores | 46 | — |
| Tensor cores | 184 | — |
| FP32 performance (TFLOPS) | 29.15 TFLOPS (+26.85 TFLOPS) | 2.30 TFLOPS |
| Pixel fill rate (GPixel/s) | 158.40 GPixel/s (+105.12 GPixel/s) | 53.28 GPixel/s |
| Texture fill rate (GTexel/s) | 455.40 GTexel/s (+362.16 GTexel/s) | 93.24 GTexel/s |
| Energy efficiency | 31.5 (+5.0) | 26.4 |
| PassMark (overall) | 19,489 (+12373) | 7,116 |
| 3DMark Time Spy | 11,960 (+8472) | 3,488 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike | 30,051 (+20738) | 9,313 |
| Geekbench OpenCL | 168,695 (+129542) | 39,153 |
| Geekbench Vulkan | 159,285 (+123037) | 36,248 |
| Normalized score | 84.5 (+31.1) | 53.3 |
Only in component A
DLSS
ReBAR
ray_tracing
In both
CUDA
FPS in games (1080p)
| Game | GeForce RTX 4070 | GeForce GTX 1650 | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|
| A Plague Tale Requiem | 59 FPS | 26 FPS | +126.9% (A) |
| Alan Wake 2 | 65 FPS | 19 FPS | +242.1% (A) |
| Anno 1800 | 92 FPS | 34 FPS | +170.6% (A) |
| Armored Core 6 | 91 FPS | 42 FPS | +116.7% (A) |
| Assassin's Creed Mirage | 116 FPS | 28 FPS | +314.3% (A) |
| Atlas Fallen | 107 FPS | 47 FPS | +127.7% (A) |
| Atomic Heart | 86 FPS | 30 FPS | +186.7% (A) |
| Avatar Frontiers of Pandora | 65 FPS | 13 FPS | +400% (A) |
| Back 4 Blood | 221 FPS | 82 FPS | +169.5% (A) |
| Baldur's Gate 3 | 73 FPS | 33 FPS | +121.2% (A) |
| Battlefield 5 | 140 FPS | 60 FPS | +133.3% (A) |
| Borderlands 3 | 107 FPS | 36 FPS | +197.2% (A) |
| CS:GO | 240 FPS | 240 FPS | ≈ |
| Call of Duty Modern Warfare 3 2023 | 99 FPS | 37 FPS | +167.6% (A) |
| Company of Heroes 3 | 135 FPS | 45 FPS | +200% (A) |
| Counter-Strike 2 | 250 FPS | 131 FPS | +90.8% (A) |
| Counter-Strike 2 | 152 FPS | 80 FPS | +90% (A) |
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 135 FPS | 52 FPS | +159.6% (A) |
| Cyberpunk 2077 1.6 | 58 FPS | 32 FPS | +81.3% (A) |
| Days Gone | 155 FPS | 56 FPS | +176.8% (A) |
| Dead Island 2 | 152 FPS | 50 FPS | +204% (A) |
| Dead Space Remake | 81 FPS | 22 FPS | +268.2% (A) |
| Deathloop | 130 FPS | 37 FPS | +251.4% (A) |
| Diablo 4 | 207 FPS | 72 FPS | +187.5% (A) |
| Dota 2 | 178 FPS | 96 FPS | +85.4% (A) |
| Dying Light 2 | 95 FPS | 24 FPS | +295.8% (A) |
| EA Sports WRC | 85 FPS | 26 FPS | +226.9% (A) |
| Elden Ring | 60 FPS | 51 FPS | +17.6% (A) |
| Elex 2 | 118 FPS | 37 FPS | +218.9% (A) |
| Enshrouded | 63 FPS | 15 FPS | +320% (A) |
| Escape from Tarkov | 120 FPS | 80 FPS | +50% (A) |
| F1 2020 | 228 FPS | 69 FPS | +230.4% (A) |
| F1 2021 | 163 FPS | 77 FPS | +111.7% (A) |
| F1 22 | 109 FPS | 74 FPS | +47.3% (A) |
| F1 23 | 153 FPS | 66 FPS | +131.8% (A) |
| Far Cry 5 | 139 FPS | 60 FPS | +131.7% (A) |
| Far Cry 6 | 105 FPS | 47 FPS | +123.4% (A) |
| Far Cry New Dawn | 102 FPS | 44 FPS | +131.8% (A) |
| Farming Simulator 22 | 148 FPS | 77 FPS | +92.2% (A) |
| Final Fantasy XV Benchmark | 41 FPS | 32 FPS | +28.1% (A) |
| Flight Simulator 2020 | 83 FPS | 26 FPS | +219.2% (A) |
| Fortnite | 200 FPS | 90 FPS | +122.2% (A) |
| Forza Horizon 4 | 180 FPS | 82 FPS | +119.5% (A) |
| Forza Horizon 5 | 190 FPS | 73 FPS | +160.3% (A) |
| GRID Legends | 126 FPS | 76 FPS | +65.8% (A) |
| GTA V | 140 FPS | 140 FPS | ≈ |
| GTA V | 134 FPS | 68 FPS | +97.1% (A) |
| Ghostwire Tokyo | 172 FPS | 53 FPS | +224.5% (A) |
| God of War | 96 FPS | 30 FPS | +220% (A) |
| Guardians of the Galaxy | 147 FPS | 46 FPS | +219.6% (A) |
| Halo Infinite | 149 FPS | 41 FPS | +263.4% (A) |
| High On Life | 127 FPS | 49 FPS | +159.2% (A) |
| Hitman 3 | 208 FPS | 55 FPS | +278.2% (A) |
| Hogwarts Legacy | 57 FPS | 29 FPS | +96.6% (A) |
| Horizon Zero Dawn | 143 FPS | 41 FPS | +248.8% (A) |
| Immortals of Aveum | 56 FPS | 26 FPS | +115.4% (A) |
| Lies of P | 150 FPS | 47 FPS | +219.1% (A) |
| Lords of the Fallen | 63 FPS | 18 FPS | +250% (A) |
| Metro Exodus | 111 FPS | 33 FPS | +236.4% (A) |
| Monster Hunter World | 169 FPS | 51 FPS | +231.4% (A) |
| Need for Speed Unbound | 99 FPS | 33 FPS | +200% (A) |
| Outriders | 145 FPS | 54 FPS | +168.5% (A) |
| Overwatch | 240 FPS | 240 FPS | ≈ |
| PUBG | 140 FPS | 140 FPS | ≈ |
| Palworld | 102 FPS | 34 FPS | +200% (A) |
| Prince of Persia The Lost Crown | 322 FPS | 211 FPS | +52.6% (A) |
| Rainbow Six Extraction | 240 FPS | 69 FPS | +247.8% (A) |
| Ratchet & Clank Rift Apart | 58 FPS | 15 FPS | +286.7% (A) |
| Ready or Not | 194 FPS | 64 FPS | +203.1% (A) |
| Resident Evil 4 Remake | 160 FPS | 46 FPS | +247.8% (A) |
| Resident Evil Village | 212 FPS | 64 FPS | +231.3% (A) |
| Returnal | 64 FPS | 33 FPS | +93.9% (A) |
| Riders Republic | 135 FPS | 46 FPS | +193.5% (A) |
| Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 149 FPS | 59 FPS | +152.5% (A) |
| Sons of the Forest | 72 FPS | 32 FPS | +125% (A) |
| Spider-Man Miles Morales | 115 FPS | 34 FPS | +238.2% (A) |
| Star Wars Jedi Survivor | 65 FPS | 22 FPS | +195.5% (A) |
| Starfield | 51 FPS | 18 FPS | +183.3% (A) |
| The Callisto Protocol | 112 FPS | 53 FPS | +111.3% (A) |
| The Crew Motorfest | 60 FPS | 33 FPS | +81.8% (A) |
| The Finals | 168 FPS | 60 FPS | +180% (A) |
| The Last of Us | 57 FPS | 19 FPS | +200% (A) |
| The Quarry | 122 FPS | 34 FPS | +258.8% (A) |
| The Witcher 3 | 229 FPS | 62 FPS | +269.4% (A) |
| The Witcher 3 | 124 FPS | 45 FPS | +175.6% (A) |
| The Witcher 3 v4 | 101 FPS | 20 FPS | +405% (A) |
| Total War Pharaoh | 137 FPS | 53 FPS | +158.5% (A) |
| Total War: Three Kingdoms | 133 FPS | 39 FPS | +241% (A) |
| Uncharted Legacy of Thieves Collection | 84 FPS | 17 FPS | +394.1% (A) |
| Valorant | 260 FPS | 164 FPS | +58.5% (A) |
| Vampire Bloodhunt | 200 FPS | 77 FPS | +159.7% (A) |
| Watch Dogs Legion | 130 FPS | 39 FPS | +233.3% (A) |
| X-Plane 11.11 | 52 FPS | 45 FPS | +15.6% (A) |
Specs from public sources (PassMark, Geekbench). FPS measured at 1080p medium settings.
Based on the comparison:
GeForce RTX 4070 wins 21 of the comparable criteria.
The choice depends on your use case.
🤔 How to choose
Universal advice for any use case.
- Reliability vs price: reliability (median 50) ↔ price (median 385.1).
- Weight vs CPU: mobility (median 48) ↔ overall performance (median 49.8).
- Upgradeability vs battery: upgradability (median 50) ↔ battery life (median 2.8).