Component comparison
GeForce RTX 4070 vs GeForce GTX 1050 Ti
GeForce RTX 4070 vs GeForce GTX 1050 Ti — detailed GPU comparison: performance, gaming FPS, specifications.
Advantages
A
GeForce RTX 4070
- + Release year (+7)
- + VRAM (GB) (+4 GB)
- + Bandwidth (GB/s) (+392 GB/s)
- + Memory bus (bit) (+64 bit)
- + TGP / TDP (W) (+40 W)
- + Lithography (nm) (-9 nm)
- + Transistors (M) (+32,500M)
- + CUDA cores (+5120)
- + TMUs (+136)
- + ROPs (+32)
- + FP32 performance (TFLOPS) (+26.97 TFLOPS)
- + Pixel fill rate (GPixel/s) (+113.86 GPixel/s)
- + Texture fill rate (GTexel/s) (+388.58 GTexel/s)
- + Energy efficiency (+15.7)
- + PassMark (overall) (+13126)
- + 3DMark Time Spy (+9699)
- + 3DMark Fire Strike (+22566)
- + Geekbench OpenCL (+148041)
- + Geekbench Vulkan (+139495)
- + Normalized score (+43.7)
B
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti
- + Die size (mm²) (+162 mm²)
Detailed spec comparison
| Spec |
Component A
GeForce RTX 4070
|
Component B
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti
|
|---|---|---|
| Release year | 2023 (+7) | 2016 |
| VRAM (GB) | 8 GB (+4 GB) | 4 GB |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Memory clock (MHz) | 2000 MHz | — |
| Bandwidth (GB/s) | 504 GB/s (+392 GB/s) | 112 GB/s |
| Memory bus (bit) | 192 bit (+64 bit) | 128 bit |
| TGP / TDP (W) | 115 W (+40 W) | 75 W |
| Lithography (nm) | 5 nm (-9 nm) | 14 nm |
| Transistors (M) | 35,800M (+32,500M) | 3,300M |
| Die size (mm²) | 294 mm² | 132 mm² (+162 mm²) |
| Base clock (MHz) | — | — |
| Boost clock (MHz) | — | — |
| CUDA cores | 5,888 (+5120) | 768 |
| TMUs | 184 (+136) | 48 |
| ROPs | 64 (+32) | 32 |
| RT cores | 46 | — |
| Tensor cores | 184 | — |
| FP32 performance (TFLOPS) | 29.15 TFLOPS (+26.97 TFLOPS) | 2.18 TFLOPS |
| Pixel fill rate (GPixel/s) | 158.40 GPixel/s (+113.86 GPixel/s) | 44.54 GPixel/s |
| Texture fill rate (GTexel/s) | 455.40 GTexel/s (+388.58 GTexel/s) | 66.82 GTexel/s |
| Energy efficiency | 31.5 (+15.7) | 15.8 |
| PassMark (overall) | 19,489 (+13126) | 6,363 |
| 3DMark Time Spy | 11,960 (+9699) | 2,261 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike | 30,051 (+22566) | 7,485 |
| Geekbench OpenCL | 168,695 (+148041) | 20,654 |
| Geekbench Vulkan | 159,285 (+139495) | 19,790 |
| Normalized score | 84.5 (+43.7) | 40.8 |
Only in component A
DLSS
ReBAR
ray_tracing
In both
CUDA
FPS in games (1080p)
| Game | GeForce RTX 4070 | GeForce GTX 1050 Ti | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|
| Anno 1800 | 92 FPS | 39 FPS | +135.9% (A) |
| Battlefield 5 | 140 FPS | 57 FPS | +145.6% (A) |
| Borderlands 3 | 107 FPS | 28 FPS | +282.1% (A) |
| CS:GO | 240 FPS | 240 FPS | ≈ |
| Counter-Strike 2 | 250 FPS | 70 FPS | +257.1% (A) |
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 135 FPS | 27 FPS | +400% (A) |
| Cyberpunk 2077 1.6 | 58 FPS | 17 FPS | +241.2% (A) |
| Deathloop | 130 FPS | 21 FPS | +519% (A) |
| Dota 2 | 178 FPS | 98 FPS | +81.6% (A) |
| Dying Light 2 | 95 FPS | 17 FPS | +458.8% (A) |
| Elden Ring | 60 FPS | 26 FPS | +130.8% (A) |
| Elex 2 | 118 FPS | 21 FPS | +461.9% (A) |
| Escape from Tarkov | 120 FPS | 45 FPS | +166.7% (A) |
| F1 2020 | 228 FPS | 63 FPS | +261.9% (A) |
| F1 22 | 109 FPS | 48 FPS | +127.1% (A) |
| Far Cry 5 | 139 FPS | 48 FPS | +189.6% (A) |
| Far Cry 6 | 105 FPS | 29 FPS | +262.1% (A) |
| Far Cry New Dawn | 102 FPS | 42 FPS | +142.9% (A) |
| Farming Simulator 22 | 148 FPS | 46 FPS | +221.7% (A) |
| Final Fantasy XV Benchmark | 41 FPS | 23 FPS | +78.3% (A) |
| Flight Simulator 2020 | 83 FPS | 17 FPS | +388.2% (A) |
| Fortnite | 200 FPS | 75 FPS | +166.7% (A) |
| Forza Horizon 4 | 180 FPS | 67 FPS | +168.7% (A) |
| Forza Horizon 5 | 190 FPS | 40 FPS | +375% (A) |
| GRID Legends | 126 FPS | 42 FPS | +200% (A) |
| GTA V | 140 FPS | 140 FPS | ≈ |
| GTA V | 134 FPS | 60 FPS | +123.3% (A) |
| Ghostwire Tokyo | 172 FPS | 33 FPS | +421.2% (A) |
| God of War | 96 FPS | 12 FPS | +700% (A) |
| Hitman 3 | 208 FPS | 40 FPS | +420% (A) |
| Horizon Zero Dawn | 143 FPS | 31 FPS | +361.3% (A) |
| Metro Exodus | 111 FPS | 31 FPS | +258.1% (A) |
| Monster Hunter World | 169 FPS | 33 FPS | +412.1% (A) |
| Overwatch | 240 FPS | 240 FPS | ≈ |
| PUBG | 140 FPS | 140 FPS | ≈ |
| Rainbow Six Extraction | 240 FPS | 42 FPS | +471.4% (A) |
| Resident Evil 4 Remake | 160 FPS | 24 FPS | +566.7% (A) |
| Riders Republic | 135 FPS | 29 FPS | +365.5% (A) |
| Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 149 FPS | 31 FPS | +380.6% (A) |
| The Quarry | 122 FPS | 24 FPS | +408.3% (A) |
| The Witcher 3 | 229 FPS | 46 FPS | +397.8% (A) |
| The Witcher 3 | 124 FPS | 21 FPS | +490.5% (A) |
| Tiny Tina's Wonderlands | 74 FPS | 24 FPS | +208.3% (A) |
| Valorant | 260 FPS | 110 FPS | +136.4% (A) |
| Vampire Bloodhunt | 200 FPS | 58 FPS | +244.8% (A) |
| Watch Dogs Legion | 130 FPS | 27 FPS | +381.5% (A) |
| X-Plane 11.11 | 52 FPS | 44 FPS | +18.2% (A) |
Specs from public sources (PassMark, Geekbench). FPS measured at 1080p medium settings.
Based on the comparison:
GeForce RTX 4070 wins 20 of the comparable criteria.
The choice depends on your use case.
🤔 How to choose
Universal advice for any use case.
- Reliability vs price: reliability (median 50) ↔ price (median 385.1).
- Weight vs CPU: mobility (median 48) ↔ overall performance (median 49.8).
- Upgradeability vs battery: upgradability (median 50) ↔ battery life (median 2.8).