Component comparison
GeForce RTX 4060 vs GeForce RTX 5060
GeForce RTX 4060 vs GeForce RTX 5060 — detailed GPU comparison: performance, gaming FPS, specifications.
Advantages
A
GeForce RTX 4060
- + Memory clock (MHz) (+500 MHz)
- + TGP / TDP (W) (+70 W)
- + Die size (mm²) (+22 mm²)
- + PassMark (overall) (+606)
- + Normalized score (+25.6)
B
GeForce RTX 5060
- + Release year (+2)
- + Bandwidth (GB/s) (+176 GB/s)
- + Transistors (M) (+3,000M)
- + CUDA cores (+768)
- + TMUs (+24)
- + RT cores (+6)
- + Tensor cores (+24)
- + FP32 performance (TFLOPS) (+4.07 TFLOPS)
- + Pixel fill rate (GPixel/s) (+1.80 GPixel/s)
- + Texture fill rate (GTexel/s) (+63.40 GTexel/s)
- + Energy efficiency (+41.1)
- + 3DMark Fire Strike (+4836)
Detailed spec comparison
| Spec |
Component A
GeForce RTX 4060
|
Component B
GeForce RTX 5060
|
|---|---|---|
| Release year | 2023 | 2025 (+2) |
| VRAM (GB) | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR7 |
| Memory clock (MHz) | 2000 MHz (+500 MHz) | 1500 MHz |
| Bandwidth (GB/s) | 272 GB/s | 448 GB/s (+176 GB/s) |
| Memory bus (bit) | 128 bit | 128 bit |
| TGP / TDP (W) | 115 W (+70 W) | 45 W |
| Lithography (nm) | 5 nm | 5 nm |
| Transistors (M) | 18,900M | 21,900M (+3,000M) |
| Die size (mm²) | 159 mm² (+22 mm²) | 181 mm² |
| Base clock (MHz) | — | — |
| Boost clock (MHz) | — | — |
| CUDA cores | 3,072 | 3,840 (+768) |
| TMUs | 96 | 120 (+24) |
| ROPs | 48 | 48 |
| RT cores | 24 | 30 (+6) |
| Tensor cores | 96 | 120 (+24) |
| FP32 performance (TFLOPS) | 15.11 TFLOPS | 19.18 TFLOPS (+4.07 TFLOPS) |
| Pixel fill rate (GPixel/s) | 118.10 GPixel/s | 119.90 GPixel/s (+1.80 GPixel/s) |
| Texture fill rate (GTexel/s) | 236.20 GTexel/s | 299.60 GTexel/s (+63.40 GTexel/s) |
| Energy efficiency | 28.0 | 69.2 (+41.1) |
| PassMark (overall) | 17,355 (+606) | 16,749 |
| 3DMark Time Spy | 10,329 | — |
| 3DMark Fire Strike | 26,530 | 31,366 (+4836) |
| Geekbench OpenCL | 101,654 | — |
| Geekbench Vulkan | 99,998 | — |
| Normalized score | 75.9 (+25.6) | 50.3 |
In both
CUDA
DLSS
ReBAR
ray_tracing
FPS in games (1080p)
| Game | GeForce RTX 4060 | GeForce RTX 5060 | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|
| Battlefield 5 | 130 FPS | 130 FPS | ≈ |
| CS:GO | 240 FPS | 240 FPS | ≈ |
| Counter-Strike 2 | 195 FPS | 220 FPS | 12.8% (B) |
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 123 FPS | 95 FPS | +29.5% (A) |
| Escape from Tarkov | 120 FPS | 120 FPS | ≈ |
| Far Cry 5 | 128 FPS | 130 FPS | 1.6% (B) |
| Fortnite | 180 FPS | 170 FPS | +5.9% (A) |
| Forza Horizon 4 | 160 FPS | 150 FPS | +6.7% (A) |
| Forza Horizon 5 | 238 FPS | 255 FPS | 7.1% (B) |
| GTA V | 140 FPS | 140 FPS | ≈ |
| Metro Exodus | 25 FPS | 95 FPS | 280% (B) |
| Overwatch | 240 FPS | 240 FPS | ≈ |
| PUBG | 140 FPS | 140 FPS | ≈ |
| Resident Evil 4 Remake | 124 FPS | 110 FPS | +12.7% (A) |
| The Witcher 3 | 191 FPS | 140 FPS | +36.4% (A) |
| Valorant | 240 FPS | 230 FPS | +4.3% (A) |
Specs from public sources (PassMark, Geekbench). FPS measured at 1080p medium settings.
Based on the comparison:
GeForce RTX 5060 wins 12 of the comparable criteria.
The choice depends on your use case.
🤔 How to choose
Universal advice for any use case.
- Reliability vs price: reliability (median 50) ↔ price (median 385.1).
- Weight vs CPU: mobility (median 48) ↔ overall performance (median 49.8).
- Upgradeability vs battery: upgradability (median 50) ↔ battery life (median 2.8).