Component comparison

GeForce RTX 4060 vs GeForce RTX 3080 Ti

GeForce RTX 4060 vs GeForce RTX 3080 Ti — detailed GPU comparison: performance, gaming FPS, specifications.

Advantages

A GeForce RTX 4060
  • + Release year (+2)
  • + Lithography (nm) (-3 nm)
  • + Die size (mm²) (+469 mm²)
  • + Energy efficiency (+13.9)
  • + Normalized score (+9.6)
B GeForce RTX 3080 Ti
  • + VRAM (GB) (+4 GB)
  • + Bandwidth (GB/s) (+640 GB/s)
  • + Memory bus (bit) (+256 bit)
  • + Transistors (M) (+9,400M)
  • + CUDA cores (+7168)
  • + TMUs (+224)
  • + ROPs (+64)
  • + RT cores (+56)
  • + Tensor cores (+224)
  • + FP32 performance (TFLOPS) (+18.99 TFLOPS)
  • + Pixel fill rate (GPixel/s) (+68.40 GPixel/s)
  • + Texture fill rate (GTexel/s) (+296.60 GTexel/s)
  • + PassMark (overall) (+9405)
  • + 3DMark Fire Strike (+20583)
  • + Geekbench OpenCL (+107427)

Detailed spec comparison

Spec Component A
GeForce RTX 4060
 Component B
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti
Release year 2023 (+2) 2021
VRAM (GB) 8 GB 12 GB (+4 GB)
Memory type GDDR6 GDDR6X
Memory clock (MHz) 2000 MHz —
Bandwidth (GB/s) 272 GB/s 912 GB/s (+640 GB/s)
Memory bus (bit) 128 bit 384 bit (+256 bit)
TGP / TDP (W) 115 W —
Lithography (nm) 5 nm (-3 nm) 8 nm
Transistors (M) 18,900M 28,300M (+9,400M)
Die size (mm²) 159 mm² (+469 mm²) 628 mm²
Base clock (MHz) — —
Boost clock (MHz) — —
CUDA cores 3,072 10,240 (+7168)
TMUs 96 320 (+224)
ROPs 48 112 (+64)
RT cores 24 80 (+56)
Tensor cores 96 320 (+224)
FP32 performance (TFLOPS) 15.11 TFLOPS 34.10 TFLOPS (+18.99 TFLOPS)
Pixel fill rate (GPixel/s) 118.10 GPixel/s 186.50 GPixel/s (+68.40 GPixel/s)
Texture fill rate (GTexel/s) 236.20 GTexel/s 532.80 GTexel/s (+296.60 GTexel/s)
Energy efficiency 28.0 (+13.9) 14.2
PassMark (overall) 17,355 26,760 (+9405)
3DMark Time Spy 10,329 —
3DMark Fire Strike 26,530 47,113 (+20583)
Geekbench OpenCL 101,654 209,081 (+107427)
Geekbench Vulkan 99,998 —
Normalized score 75.9 (+9.6) 66.3

In both

CUDA DLSS ReBAR ray_tracing

FPS in games (1080p)

Game GeForce RTX 4060 GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Delta
A Plague Tale Requiem 73 FPS 64 FPS +14.1% (A)
Alan Wake 2 54 FPS 76 FPS 40.7% (B)
Alan Wake Remastered 145 FPS 119 FPS +21.8% (A)
Armored Core 6 100 FPS 115 FPS 15% (B)
Assassin's Creed Mirage 76 FPS 109 FPS 43.4% (B)
Assassin´s Creed Valhalla 111 FPS 99 FPS +12.1% (A)
Atlas Fallen 89 FPS 162 FPS 82% (B)
Atomic Heart 63 FPS 100 FPS 58.7% (B)
Avatar Frontiers of Pandora 32 FPS 73 FPS 128.1% (B)
Back 4 Blood 198 FPS 263 FPS 32.8% (B)
Baldur's Gate 3 69 FPS 111 FPS 60.9% (B)
Battlefield 2042 123 FPS 121 FPS +1.7% (A)
Battlefield 5 130 FPS 170 FPS 30.8% (B)
Borderlands 3 107 FPS 100 FPS +7% (A)
CS:GO 240 FPS 240 FPS ≈
Call of Duty Modern Warfare 2 2022 70 FPS 109 FPS 55.7% (B)
Call of Duty Modern Warfare 3 2023 81 FPS 117 FPS 44.4% (B)
Company of Heroes 3 102 FPS 175 FPS 71.6% (B)
Counter-Strike 2 195 FPS 300 FPS 53.8% (B)
Counter-Strike 2 157 FPS 194 FPS 23.6% (B)
Crysis Remastered 86 FPS 103 FPS 19.8% (B)
Cyberpunk 2077 123 FPS 219 FPS 78% (B)
Cyberpunk 2077 1.6 64 FPS 64 FPS ≈
Days Gone 131 FPS 177 FPS 35.1% (B)
Dead Space Remake 54 FPS 95 FPS 75.9% (B)
Death Stranding 150 FPS 151 FPS 0.7% (B)
Diablo 4 180 FPS 238 FPS 32.2% (B)
Dirt 5 116 FPS 137 FPS 18.1% (B)
Dota 2 164 FPS 234 FPS 42.7% (B)
Dragon's Dogma 2 57 FPS 70 FPS 22.8% (B)
Dying Light 2 52 FPS 69 FPS 32.7% (B)
EA Sports FC 24 143 FPS 194 FPS 35.7% (B)
EA Sports WRC 85 FPS 101 FPS 18.8% (B)
Elex 2 114 FPS 43 FPS +165.1% (A)
F1 2021 208 FPS 182 FPS +14.3% (A)
F1 22 125 FPS 172 FPS 37.6% (B)
F1 23 144 FPS 193 FPS 34% (B)
Far Cry 5 128 FPS 208 FPS 62.5% (B)
Far Cry 6 101 FPS 91 FPS +11% (A)
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark 75 FPS 31 FPS +141.9% (A)
Flight Simulator 2020 69 FPS 79 FPS 14.5% (B)
Fortnite 180 FPS 300 FPS 66.7% (B)
Forza Horizon 4 160 FPS 250 FPS 56.3% (B)
Forza Horizon 5 238 FPS 200 FPS +19% (A)
GRID Legends 132 FPS 117 FPS +12.8% (A)
GTA V 140 FPS 140 FPS ≈
GTA V 141 FPS 153 FPS 8.5% (B)
Gears Tactics 157 FPS 196 FPS 24.8% (B)
Ghostwire Tokyo 69 FPS 126 FPS 82.6% (B)
God of War 52 FPS 110 FPS 111.5% (B)
Guardians of the Galaxy 135 FPS 112 FPS +20.5% (A)
Halo Infinite 124 FPS 147 FPS 18.5% (B)
High On Life 92 FPS 154 FPS 67.4% (B)
Hitman 3 173 FPS 197 FPS 13.9% (B)
Hogwarts Legacy 71 FPS 89 FPS 25.4% (B)
Immortals of Aveum 53 FPS 63 FPS 18.9% (B)
Lies of P 127 FPS 158 FPS 24.4% (B)
Lords of the Fallen 47 FPS 64 FPS 36.2% (B)
Metro Exodus 25 FPS 172 FPS 588% (B)
Need for Speed Unbound 75 FPS 107 FPS 42.7% (B)
Overwatch 240 FPS 240 FPS ≈
PUBG 140 FPS 140 FPS ≈
Rainbow Six Extraction 141 FPS 157 FPS 11.3% (B)
Ratchet & Clank Rift Apart 59 FPS 94 FPS 59.3% (B)
Ready or Not 148 FPS 208 FPS 40.5% (B)
Resident Evil 4 Remake 124 FPS 190 FPS 53.2% (B)
Returnal 63 FPS 114 FPS 81% (B)
Riders Republic 122 FPS 101 FPS +20.8% (A)
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 156 FPS 156 FPS ≈
Sons of the Forest 60 FPS 86 FPS 43.3% (B)
Spider-Man Miles Morales 73 FPS 117 FPS 60.3% (B)
Star Wars Jedi Survivor 50 FPS 79 FPS 58% (B)
Starfield 47 FPS 58 FPS 23.4% (B)
The Callisto Protocol 78 FPS 95 FPS 21.8% (B)
The Crew Motorfest 60 FPS 60 FPS ≈
The Finals 156 FPS 190 FPS 21.8% (B)
The Last of Us 55 FPS 88 FPS 60% (B)
The Quarry 73 FPS 126 FPS 72.6% (B)
The Witcher 3 191 FPS 372 FPS 94.8% (B)
The Witcher 3 110 FPS 144 FPS 30.9% (B)
The Witcher 3 v4 59 FPS 168 FPS 184.7% (B)
Tiny Tina's Wonderlands 87 FPS 124 FPS 42.5% (B)
Total War Pharaoh 128 FPS 157 FPS 22.7% (B)
Uncharted Legacy of Thieves Collection 68 FPS 86 FPS 26.5% (B)
Valorant 240 FPS 350 FPS 45.8% (B)
Vampire Bloodhunt 201 FPS 252 FPS 25.4% (B)
X-Plane 11.11 61 FPS 33 FPS +84.8% (A)
Yakuza Like a Dragon 117 FPS 160 FPS 36.8% (B)

Specs from public sources (PassMark, Geekbench). FPS measured at 1080p medium settings.

Based on the comparison: GeForce RTX 3080 Ti wins 15 of the comparable criteria. The choice depends on your use case.

🤔 How to choose

Universal advice for any use case.

  • Reliability vs price: reliability (median 50) ↔ price (median 385.1).
  • Weight vs CPU: mobility (median 48) ↔ overall performance (median 49.8).
  • Upgradeability vs battery: upgradability (median 50) ↔ battery life (median 2.8).
All reviews