Component comparison

GeForce RTX 4060 vs GeForce RTX 3070 Ti

GeForce RTX 4060 vs GeForce RTX 3070 Ti — detailed GPU comparison: performance, gaming FPS, specifications.

Advantages

A GeForce RTX 4060
  • + Release year (+1)
  • + Memory clock (MHz) (+250 MHz)
  • + Lithography (nm) (-3 nm)
  • + Transistors (M) (+1,500M)
  • + Die size (mm²) (+233 mm²)
  • + Energy efficiency (+0.1)
  • + PassMark (overall) (+52)
  • + Normalized score (+12.3)
B GeForce RTX 3070 Ti
  • + Bandwidth (GB/s) (+336 GB/s)
  • + Memory bus (bit) (+128 bit)
  • + CUDA cores (+3072)
  • + TMUs (+96)
  • + ROPs (+48)
  • + RT cores (+24)
  • + Tensor cores (+96)
  • + FP32 performance (TFLOPS) (+6.64 TFLOPS)
  • + Pixel fill rate (GPixel/s) (+51.80 GPixel/s)
  • + Texture fill rate (GTexel/s) (+103.60 GTexel/s)
  • + 3DMark Time Spy (+133)
  • + 3DMark Fire Strike (+1246)

Detailed spec comparison

Spec Component A
GeForce RTX 4060
 Component B
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti
Release year 2023 (+1) 2022
VRAM (GB) 8 GB 8 GB
Memory type GDDR6 GDDR6
Memory clock (MHz) 2000 MHz (+250 MHz) 1750 MHz
Bandwidth (GB/s) 272 GB/s 608 GB/s (+336 GB/s)
Memory bus (bit) 128 bit 256 bit (+128 bit)
TGP / TDP (W) 115 W 115 W
Lithography (nm) 5 nm (-3 nm) 8 nm
Transistors (M) 18,900M (+1,500M) 17,400M
Die size (mm²) 159 mm² (+233 mm²) 392 mm²
Base clock (MHz) — —
Boost clock (MHz) — —
CUDA cores 3,072 6,144 (+3072)
TMUs 96 192 (+96)
ROPs 48 96 (+48)
RT cores 24 48 (+24)
Tensor cores 96 192 (+96)
FP32 performance (TFLOPS) 15.11 TFLOPS 21.75 TFLOPS (+6.64 TFLOPS)
Pixel fill rate (GPixel/s) 118.10 GPixel/s 169.90 GPixel/s (+51.80 GPixel/s)
Texture fill rate (GTexel/s) 236.20 GTexel/s 339.80 GTexel/s (+103.60 GTexel/s)
Energy efficiency 28.0 (+0.1) 27.9
PassMark (overall) 17,355 (+52) 17,303
3DMark Time Spy 10,329 10,462 (+133)
3DMark Fire Strike 26,530 27,776 (+1246)
Geekbench OpenCL 101,654 —
Geekbench Vulkan 99,998 —
Normalized score 75.9 (+12.3) 63.6

In both

CUDA DLSS ReBAR ray_tracing

FPS in games (1080p)

Game GeForce RTX 4060 GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Delta
A Plague Tale Requiem 73 FPS 71 FPS +2.8% (A)
Alan Wake Remastered 145 FPS 131 FPS +10.7% (A)
Armored Core 6 100 FPS 90 FPS +11.1% (A)
Assassin's Creed Mirage 76 FPS 102 FPS 34.2% (B)
Assassin´s Creed Valhalla 111 FPS 85 FPS +30.6% (A)
Atlas Fallen 89 FPS 119 FPS 33.7% (B)
Atomic Heart 63 FPS 95 FPS 50.8% (B)
Back 4 Blood 198 FPS 189 FPS +4.8% (A)
Baldur's Gate 3 69 FPS 95 FPS 37.7% (B)
Battlefield 2042 123 FPS 97 FPS +26.8% (A)
Battlefield 5 130 FPS 130 FPS ≈
Borderlands 3 107 FPS 92 FPS +16.3% (A)
CS:GO 240 FPS 240 FPS ≈
Call of Duty Modern Warfare 2 2022 70 FPS 87 FPS 24.3% (B)
Company of Heroes 3 102 FPS 148 FPS 45.1% (B)
Counter-Strike 2 195 FPS 220 FPS 12.8% (B)
Crysis Remastered 86 FPS 72 FPS +19.4% (A)
Cyberpunk 2077 123 FPS 129 FPS 4.9% (B)
Cyberpunk 2077 1.6 64 FPS 65 FPS 1.6% (B)
Days Gone 131 FPS 115 FPS +13.9% (A)
Dead Island 2 154 FPS 173 FPS 12.3% (B)
Dead Space Remake 54 FPS 68 FPS 25.9% (B)
Death Stranding 150 FPS 132 FPS +13.6% (A)
Diablo 4 180 FPS 223 FPS 23.9% (B)
Dirt 5 116 FPS 98 FPS +18.4% (A)
Dota 2 164 FPS 146 FPS +12.3% (A)
Dying Light 2 52 FPS 66 FPS 26.9% (B)
EA Sports FC 24 143 FPS 134 FPS +6.7% (A)
Elex 2 114 FPS 83 FPS +37.3% (A)
Escape from Tarkov 120 FPS 120 FPS ≈
F1 2021 208 FPS 139 FPS +49.6% (A)
F1 22 125 FPS 157 FPS 25.6% (B)
F1 23 144 FPS 178 FPS 23.6% (B)
Far Cry 5 128 FPS 138 FPS 7.8% (B)
Far Cry 6 101 FPS 89 FPS +13.5% (A)
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark 75 FPS 50 FPS +50% (A)
Flight Simulator 2020 69 FPS 70 FPS 1.4% (B)
Fortnite 180 FPS 180 FPS ≈
Forza Horizon 4 160 FPS 160 FPS ≈
Forza Horizon 5 238 FPS 210 FPS +13.3% (A)
GRID Legends 132 FPS 148 FPS 12.1% (B)
GTA V 140 FPS 140 FPS ≈
GTA V 141 FPS 80 FPS +76.3% (A)
Gears Tactics 157 FPS 135 FPS +16.3% (A)
Ghostwire Tokyo 69 FPS 124 FPS 79.7% (B)
God of War 52 FPS 77 FPS 48.1% (B)
Guardians of the Galaxy 135 FPS 111 FPS +21.6% (A)
Halo Infinite 124 FPS 101 FPS +22.8% (A)
High On Life 92 FPS 118 FPS 28.3% (B)
Hitman 3 173 FPS 146 FPS +18.5% (A)
Hogwarts Legacy 71 FPS 70 FPS +1.4% (A)
Immortals of Aveum 53 FPS 53 FPS ≈
Lies of P 127 FPS 134 FPS 5.5% (B)
Lords of the Fallen 47 FPS 56 FPS 19.1% (B)
Metro Exodus 25 FPS 95 FPS 280% (B)
Need for Speed Unbound 75 FPS 93 FPS 24% (B)
Overwatch 240 FPS 240 FPS ≈
PUBG 140 FPS 140 FPS ≈
Rainbow Six Extraction 141 FPS 176 FPS 24.8% (B)
Ratchet & Clank Rift Apart 59 FPS 60 FPS 1.7% (B)
Resident Evil 4 Remake 124 FPS 110 FPS +12.7% (A)
Returnal 63 FPS 103 FPS 63.5% (B)
Riders Republic 122 FPS 104 FPS +17.3% (A)
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 156 FPS 124 FPS +25.8% (A)
Sons of the Forest 60 FPS 83 FPS 38.3% (B)
Spider-Man Miles Morales 73 FPS 93 FPS 27.4% (B)
Star Wars Jedi Survivor 50 FPS 74 FPS 48% (B)
Starfield 47 FPS 50 FPS 6.4% (B)
The Callisto Protocol 78 FPS 71 FPS +9.9% (A)
The Crew Motorfest 60 FPS 60 FPS ≈
The Quarry 73 FPS 98 FPS 34.2% (B)
The Witcher 3 191 FPS 188 FPS +1.6% (A)
The Witcher 3 110 FPS 140 FPS 27.3% (B)
The Witcher 3 v4 59 FPS 81 FPS 37.3% (B)
Tiny Tina's Wonderlands 87 FPS 115 FPS 32.2% (B)
Uncharted Legacy of Thieves Collection 68 FPS 72 FPS 5.9% (B)
Valorant 240 FPS 230 FPS +4.3% (A)
Vampire Bloodhunt 201 FPS 173 FPS +16.2% (A)
X-Plane 11.11 61 FPS 52 FPS +17.3% (A)
Yakuza Like a Dragon 117 FPS 113 FPS +3.5% (A)

Specs from public sources (PassMark, Geekbench). FPS measured at 1080p medium settings.

Based on the comparison: GeForce RTX 3070 Ti wins 12 of the comparable criteria. The choice depends on your use case.

🤔 How to choose

Universal advice for any use case.

  • Reliability vs price: reliability (median 50) ↔ price (median 385.1).
  • Weight vs CPU: mobility (median 48) ↔ overall performance (median 49.8).
  • Upgradeability vs battery: upgradability (median 50) ↔ battery life (median 2.8).
All reviews