Component comparison
GeForce RTX 4060 vs GeForce RTX 2070
GeForce RTX 4060 vs GeForce RTX 2070 — detailed GPU comparison: performance, gaming FPS, specifications.
Advantages
A
GeForce RTX 4060
- + Release year (+5)
- + TGP / TDP (W) (+35 W)
- + Lithography (nm) (-7 nm)
- + Transistors (M) (+8,100M)
- + Die size (mm²) (+286 mm²)
- + CUDA cores (+768)
- + FP32 performance (TFLOPS) (+9.65 TFLOPS)
- + Pixel fill rate (GPixel/s) (+14.40 GPixel/s)
- + Texture fill rate (GTexel/s) (+2.90 GTexel/s)
- + Energy efficiency (+11.0)
- + PassMark (overall) (+1292)
- + 3DMark Time Spy (+3668)
- + 3DMark Fire Strike (+3344)
- + Geekbench OpenCL (+13217)
- + Geekbench Vulkan (+16590)
- + Normalized score (+5.4)
B
GeForce RTX 2070
- + Bandwidth (GB/s) (+176 GB/s)
- + Memory bus (bit) (+128 bit)
- + TMUs (+48)
- + ROPs (+16)
- + RT cores (+12)
- + Tensor cores (+192)
Detailed spec comparison
| Spec |
Component A
GeForce RTX 4060
|
Component B
GeForce RTX 2070
|
|---|---|---|
| Release year | 2023 (+5) | 2018 |
| VRAM (GB) | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory clock (MHz) | 2000 MHz | — |
| Bandwidth (GB/s) | 272 GB/s | 448 GB/s (+176 GB/s) |
| Memory bus (bit) | 128 bit | 256 bit (+128 bit) |
| TGP / TDP (W) | 115 W (+35 W) | 80 W |
| Lithography (nm) | 5 nm (-7 nm) | 12 nm |
| Transistors (M) | 18,900M (+8,100M) | 10,800M |
| Die size (mm²) | 159 mm² (+286 mm²) | 445 mm² |
| Base clock (MHz) | — | — |
| Boost clock (MHz) | — | — |
| CUDA cores | 3,072 (+768) | 2,304 |
| TMUs | 96 | 144 (+48) |
| ROPs | 48 | 64 (+16) |
| RT cores | 24 | 36 (+12) |
| Tensor cores | 96 | 288 (+192) |
| FP32 performance (TFLOPS) | 15.11 TFLOPS (+9.65 TFLOPS) | 5.46 TFLOPS |
| Pixel fill rate (GPixel/s) | 118.10 GPixel/s (+14.40 GPixel/s) | 103.70 GPixel/s |
| Texture fill rate (GTexel/s) | 236.20 GTexel/s (+2.90 GTexel/s) | 233.30 GTexel/s |
| Energy efficiency | 28.0 (+11.0) | 17.0 |
| PassMark (overall) | 17,355 (+1292) | 16,063 |
| 3DMark Time Spy | 10,329 (+3668) | 6,661 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike | 26,530 (+3344) | 23,186 |
| Geekbench OpenCL | 101,654 (+13217) | 88,437 |
| Geekbench Vulkan | 99,998 (+16590) | 83,408 |
| Normalized score | 75.9 (+5.4) | 70.5 |
Only in component A
ReBAR
ray_tracing
In both
CUDA
DLSS
FPS in games (1080p)
| Game | GeForce RTX 4060 | GeForce RTX 2070 | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|
| Assassin´s Creed Valhalla | 111 FPS | 69 FPS | +60.9% (A) |
| Battlefield 5 | 130 FPS | 92 FPS | +41.3% (A) |
| Borderlands 3 | 107 FPS | 71 FPS | +50.7% (A) |
| CS:GO | 240 FPS | 240 FPS | ≈ |
| Control | 89 FPS | 68 FPS | +30.9% (A) |
| Counter-Strike 2 | 195 FPS | 150 FPS | +30% (A) |
| Crysis Remastered | 86 FPS | 71 FPS | +21.1% (A) |
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 123 FPS | 60 FPS | +105% (A) |
| Days Gone | 131 FPS | 101 FPS | +29.7% (A) |
| Death Stranding | 150 FPS | 115 FPS | +30.4% (A) |
| Dirt 5 | 116 FPS | 69 FPS | +68.1% (A) |
| Dota 2 | 164 FPS | 127 FPS | +29.1% (A) |
| Escape from Tarkov | 120 FPS | 119 FPS | +0.8% (A) |
| F1 2021 | 208 FPS | 139 FPS | +49.6% (A) |
| Far Cry 5 | 128 FPS | 103 FPS | +24.3% (A) |
| Final Fantasy XV Benchmark | 75 FPS | 77 FPS | 2.7% (B) |
| Flight Simulator 2020 | 69 FPS | 49 FPS | +40.8% (A) |
| Fortnite | 180 FPS | 122 FPS | +47.5% (A) |
| Forza Horizon 4 | 160 FPS | 121 FPS | +32.2% (A) |
| Forza Horizon 5 | 238 FPS | 85 FPS | +180% (A) |
| GTA V | 140 FPS | 140 FPS | ≈ |
| GTA V | 141 FPS | 127 FPS | +11% (A) |
| Gears Tactics | 157 FPS | 115 FPS | +36.5% (A) |
| Hitman 3 | 173 FPS | 124 FPS | +39.5% (A) |
| Metro Exodus | 25 FPS | 61 FPS | 144% (B) |
| Overwatch | 240 FPS | 240 FPS | ≈ |
| PUBG | 140 FPS | 140 FPS | ≈ |
| Resident Evil 4 Remake | 124 FPS | 65 FPS | +90.8% (A) |
| Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 156 FPS | 149 FPS | +4.7% (A) |
| The Witcher 3 | 191 FPS | 122 FPS | +56.6% (A) |
| The Witcher 3 | 110 FPS | 116 FPS | 5.5% (B) |
| Valorant | 240 FPS | 180 FPS | +33.3% (A) |
| X-Plane 11.11 | 61 FPS | 72 FPS | 18% (B) |
| Yakuza Like a Dragon | 117 FPS | 96 FPS | +21.9% (A) |
Specs from public sources (PassMark, Geekbench). FPS measured at 1080p medium settings.
Based on the comparison:
GeForce RTX 4060 wins 16 of the comparable criteria.
The choice depends on your use case.
🤔 How to choose
Universal advice for any use case.
- Reliability vs price: reliability (median 50) ↔ price (median 385.1).
- Weight vs CPU: mobility (median 48) ↔ overall performance (median 49.8).
- Upgradeability vs battery: upgradability (median 50) ↔ battery life (median 2.8).