Component comparison

GeForce RTX 4060 vs GeForce RTX 2060

GeForce RTX 4060 vs GeForce RTX 2060 — detailed GPU comparison: performance, gaming FPS, specifications.

Advantages

A GeForce RTX 4060
  • + Release year (+4)
  • + VRAM (GB) (+2 GB)
  • + Memory clock (MHz) (+250 MHz)
  • + Lithography (nm) (-7 nm)
  • + Transistors (M) (+8,100M)
  • + Die size (mm²) (+286 mm²)
  • + CUDA cores (+1152)
  • + FP32 performance (TFLOPS) (+8.66 TFLOPS)
  • + Pixel fill rate (GPixel/s) (+37.46 GPixel/s)
  • + Texture fill rate (GTexel/s) (+34.60 GTexel/s)
  • + Energy efficiency (+9.9)
  • + PassMark (overall) (+3261)
  • + 3DMark Time Spy (+4188)
  • + 3DMark Fire Strike (+10199)
  • + Geekbench OpenCL (+30242)
  • + Geekbench Vulkan (+34140)
  • + Normalized score (+9.5)
B GeForce RTX 2060
  • + Bandwidth (GB/s) (+64 GB/s)
  • + Memory bus (bit) (+64 bit)
  • + TMUs (+24)
  • + RT cores (+6)
  • + Tensor cores (+144)

Detailed spec comparison

Spec Component A
GeForce RTX 4060
 Component B
GeForce RTX 2060
Release year 2023 (+4) 2019
VRAM (GB) 8 GB (+2 GB) 6 GB
Memory type GDDR6 GDDR6
Memory clock (MHz) 2000 MHz (+250 MHz) 1750 MHz
Bandwidth (GB/s) 272 GB/s 336 GB/s (+64 GB/s)
Memory bus (bit) 128 bit 192 bit (+64 bit)
TGP / TDP (W) 115 W 115 W
Lithography (nm) 5 nm (-7 nm) 12 nm
Transistors (M) 18,900M (+8,100M) 10,800M
Die size (mm²) 159 mm² (+286 mm²) 445 mm²
Base clock (MHz) — —
Boost clock (MHz) — —
CUDA cores 3,072 (+1152) 1,920
TMUs 96 120 (+24)
ROPs 48 48
RT cores 24 30 (+6)
Tensor cores 96 240 (+144)
FP32 performance (TFLOPS) 15.11 TFLOPS (+8.66 TFLOPS) 6.45 TFLOPS
Pixel fill rate (GPixel/s) 118.10 GPixel/s (+37.46 GPixel/s) 80.64 GPixel/s
Texture fill rate (GTexel/s) 236.20 GTexel/s (+34.60 GTexel/s) 201.60 GTexel/s
Energy efficiency 28.0 (+9.9) 18.1
PassMark (overall) 17,355 (+3261) 14,094
3DMark Time Spy 10,329 (+4188) 6,141
3DMark Fire Strike 26,530 (+10199) 16,331
Geekbench OpenCL 101,654 (+30242) 71,412
Geekbench Vulkan 99,998 (+34140) 65,858
Normalized score 75.9 (+9.5) 66.4

Only in component A

ReBAR

In both

CUDA DLSS ray_tracing

FPS in games (1080p)

Game GeForce RTX 4060 GeForce RTX 2060 Delta
Assassin´s Creed Valhalla 111 FPS 53 FPS +109.4% (A)
Battlefield 5 130 FPS 104 FPS +25% (A)
Borderlands 3 107 FPS 61 FPS +75.4% (A)
CS:GO 240 FPS 240 FPS ≈
Control 89 FPS 54 FPS +64.8% (A)
Counter-Strike 2 195 FPS 150 FPS +30% (A)
Crysis Remastered 86 FPS 53 FPS +62.3% (A)
Cyberpunk 2077 123 FPS 60 FPS +105% (A)
Days Gone 131 FPS 87 FPS +50.6% (A)
Death Stranding 150 FPS 92 FPS +63% (A)
Dirt 5 116 FPS 59 FPS +96.6% (A)
Dota 2 164 FPS 118 FPS +39% (A)
Escape from Tarkov 120 FPS 121 FPS 0.8% (B)
F1 2021 208 FPS 126 FPS +65.1% (A)
Far Cry 5 128 FPS 96 FPS +33.3% (A)
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark 75 FPS 52 FPS +44.2% (A)
Flight Simulator 2020 69 FPS 42 FPS +64.3% (A)
Fortnite 180 FPS 162 FPS +11.1% (A)
Forza Horizon 4 160 FPS 108 FPS +48.1% (A)
Forza Horizon 5 238 FPS 100 FPS +138% (A)
GTA V 140 FPS 140 FPS ≈
GTA V 141 FPS 95 FPS +48.4% (A)
Gears Tactics 157 FPS 93 FPS +68.8% (A)
Hitman 3 173 FPS 105 FPS +64.8% (A)
Metro Exodus 25 FPS 56 FPS 124% (B)
Overwatch 240 FPS 240 FPS ≈
PUBG 140 FPS 140 FPS ≈
Resident Evil 4 Remake 124 FPS 65 FPS +90.8% (A)
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 156 FPS 122 FPS +27.9% (A)
The Witcher 3 191 FPS 111 FPS +72.1% (A)
The Witcher 3 110 FPS 74 FPS +48.6% (A)
Valorant 240 FPS 223 FPS +7.6% (A)
X-Plane 11.11 61 FPS 56 FPS +8.9% (A)
Yakuza Like a Dragon 117 FPS 72 FPS +62.5% (A)

Specs from public sources (PassMark, Geekbench). FPS measured at 1080p medium settings.

Based on the comparison: GeForce RTX 4060 wins 17 of the comparable criteria. The choice depends on your use case.

🤔 How to choose

Universal advice for any use case.

  • Reliability vs price: reliability (median 50) ↔ price (median 385.1).
  • Weight vs CPU: mobility (median 48) ↔ overall performance (median 49.8).
  • Upgradeability vs battery: upgradability (median 50) ↔ battery life (median 2.8).
All reviews