Component comparison
GeForce RTX 4060 vs GeForce MX350
GeForce RTX 4060 vs GeForce MX350 — detailed GPU comparison: performance, gaming FPS, specifications.
Advantages
A
GeForce RTX 4060
- + Release year (+3)
- + VRAM (GB) (+6 GB)
- + Memory clock (MHz) (+248 MHz)
- + Bandwidth (GB/s) (+216 GB/s)
- + Memory bus (bit) (+64 bit)
- + TGP / TDP (W) (+95 W)
- + Lithography (nm) (-9 nm)
- + Transistors (M) (+15,600M)
- + CUDA cores (+2432)
- + TMUs (+64)
- + ROPs (+32)
- + FP32 performance (TFLOPS) (+13.91 TFLOPS)
- + Pixel fill rate (GPixel/s) (+94.61 GPixel/s)
- + Texture fill rate (GTexel/s) (+189.22 GTexel/s)
- + Energy efficiency (+1.9)
- + PassMark (overall) (+14537)
- + 3DMark Time Spy (+8993)
- + 3DMark Fire Strike (+22159)
- + Geekbench OpenCL (+88542)
- + Geekbench Vulkan (+86629)
- + Normalized score (+45.1)
B
GeForce MX350
- + Die size (mm²) (+27 mm²)
Detailed spec comparison
| Spec |
Component A
GeForce RTX 4060
|
Component B
GeForce MX350
|
|---|---|---|
| Release year | 2023 (+3) | 2020 |
| VRAM (GB) | 8 GB (+6 GB) | 2 GB |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Memory clock (MHz) | 2000 MHz (+248 MHz) | 1752 MHz |
| Bandwidth (GB/s) | 272 GB/s (+216 GB/s) | 56 GB/s |
| Memory bus (bit) | 128 bit (+64 bit) | 64 bit |
| TGP / TDP (W) | 115 W (+95 W) | 20 W |
| Lithography (nm) | 5 nm (-9 nm) | 14 nm |
| Transistors (M) | 18,900M (+15,600M) | 3,300M |
| Die size (mm²) | 159 mm² | 132 mm² (+27 mm²) |
| Base clock (MHz) | — | 1354 MHz |
| Boost clock (MHz) | — | 1468 MHz |
| CUDA cores | 3,072 (+2432) | 640 |
| TMUs | 96 (+64) | 32 |
| ROPs | 48 (+32) | 16 |
| RT cores | 24 | — |
| Tensor cores | 96 | — |
| FP32 performance (TFLOPS) | 15.11 TFLOPS (+13.91 TFLOPS) | 1.20 TFLOPS |
| Pixel fill rate (GPixel/s) | 118.10 GPixel/s (+94.61 GPixel/s) | 23.49 GPixel/s |
| Texture fill rate (GTexel/s) | 236.20 GTexel/s (+189.22 GTexel/s) | 46.98 GTexel/s |
| Energy efficiency | 28.0 (+1.9) | 26.1 |
| PassMark (overall) | 17,355 (+14537) | 2,818 |
| 3DMark Time Spy | 10,329 (+8993) | 1,336 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike | 26,530 (+22159) | 4,371 |
| Geekbench OpenCL | 101,654 (+88542) | 13,112 |
| Geekbench Vulkan | 99,998 (+86629) | 13,369 |
| Normalized score | 75.9 (+45.1) | 30.8 |
Only in component A
DLSS
ReBAR
ray_tracing
In both
CUDA
FPS in games (1080p)
| Game | GeForce RTX 4060 | GeForce MX350 | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|
| A Plague Tale Requiem | 73 FPS | 8 FPS | +812.5% (A) |
| Armored Core 6 | 100 FPS | 10 FPS | +900% (A) |
| Assassin´s Creed Valhalla | 111 FPS | 6 FPS | +1750% (A) |
| Atomic Heart | 63 FPS | 7 FPS | +800% (A) |
| Back 4 Blood | 198 FPS | 29 FPS | +582.8% (A) |
| Baldur's Gate 3 | 69 FPS | 11 FPS | +527.3% (A) |
| Battlefield 5 | 130 FPS | 37 FPS | +251.4% (A) |
| Borderlands 3 | 107 FPS | 17 FPS | +529.4% (A) |
| CS:GO | 240 FPS | 240 FPS | ≈ |
| Call of Duty Modern Warfare 2 2022 | 70 FPS | 14 FPS | +400% (A) |
| Control | 89 FPS | 12 FPS | +641.7% (A) |
| Counter-Strike 2 | 195 FPS | 66 FPS | +195.5% (A) |
| Counter-Strike 2 | 157 FPS | 31 FPS | +406.5% (A) |
| Crysis Remastered | 86 FPS | 9 FPS | +855.6% (A) |
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 123 FPS | 16 FPS | +668.8% (A) |
| Cyberpunk 2077 1.6 | 64 FPS | 6 FPS | +966.7% (A) |
| Days Gone | 131 FPS | 24 FPS | +445.8% (A) |
| Dead Island 2 | 154 FPS | 21 FPS | +633.3% (A) |
| Death Stranding | 150 FPS | 17 FPS | +782.4% (A) |
| Diablo 4 | 180 FPS | 27 FPS | +566.7% (A) |
| Dirt 5 | 116 FPS | 7 FPS | +1557.1% (A) |
| Dota 2 | 164 FPS | 83 FPS | +97.6% (A) |
| Escape from Tarkov | 120 FPS | 32 FPS | +275% (A) |
| F1 2021 | 208 FPS | 31 FPS | +571% (A) |
| F1 22 | 125 FPS | 20 FPS | +525% (A) |
| F1 23 | 144 FPS | 14 FPS | +928.6% (A) |
| Far Cry 5 | 128 FPS | 27 FPS | +374.1% (A) |
| Far Cry 6 | 101 FPS | 11 FPS | +818.2% (A) |
| Final Fantasy XV Benchmark | 75 FPS | 11 FPS | +581.8% (A) |
| Flight Simulator 2020 | 69 FPS | 9 FPS | +666.7% (A) |
| Fortnite | 180 FPS | 82 FPS | +119.5% (A) |
| Forza Horizon 4 | 160 FPS | 37 FPS | +332.4% (A) |
| Forza Horizon 5 | 238 FPS | 25 FPS | +852% (A) |
| GRID Legends | 132 FPS | 25 FPS | +428% (A) |
| GTA V | 140 FPS | 140 FPS | ≈ |
| GTA V | 141 FPS | 46 FPS | +206.5% (A) |
| Gears Tactics | 157 FPS | 30 FPS | +423.3% (A) |
| Ghostwire Tokyo | 69 FPS | 15 FPS | +360% (A) |
| Hitman 3 | 173 FPS | 19 FPS | +810.5% (A) |
| Lies of P | 127 FPS | 19 FPS | +568.4% (A) |
| Metro Exodus | 25 FPS | 12 FPS | +108.3% (A) |
| Overwatch | 240 FPS | 240 FPS | ≈ |
| PUBG | 140 FPS | 140 FPS | ≈ |
| Rainbow Six Extraction | 141 FPS | 18 FPS | +683.3% (A) |
| Ready or Not | 148 FPS | 32 FPS | +362.5% (A) |
| Resident Evil 4 Remake | 124 FPS | 18 FPS | +588.9% (A) |
| Riders Republic | 122 FPS | 15 FPS | +713.3% (A) |
| Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 156 FPS | 25 FPS | +524% (A) |
| Sons of the Forest | 60 FPS | 13 FPS | +361.5% (A) |
| The Callisto Protocol | 78 FPS | 10 FPS | +680% (A) |
| The Finals | 156 FPS | 17 FPS | +817.6% (A) |
| The Quarry | 73 FPS | 11 FPS | +563.6% (A) |
| The Witcher 3 | 191 FPS | 27 FPS | +607.4% (A) |
| The Witcher 3 | 110 FPS | 21 FPS | +423.8% (A) |
| The Witcher 3 v4 | 59 FPS | 7 FPS | +742.9% (A) |
| Tiny Tina's Wonderlands | 87 FPS | 8 FPS | +987.5% (A) |
| Total War Pharaoh | 128 FPS | 23 FPS | +456.5% (A) |
| Valorant | 240 FPS | 129 FPS | +86% (A) |
| Vampire Bloodhunt | 201 FPS | 35 FPS | +474.3% (A) |
| X-Plane 11.11 | 61 FPS | 30 FPS | +103.3% (A) |
| Yakuza Like a Dragon | 117 FPS | 20 FPS | +485% (A) |
Specs from public sources (PassMark, Geekbench). FPS measured at 1080p medium settings.
Based on the comparison:
GeForce RTX 4060 wins 21 of the comparable criteria.
The choice depends on your use case.
🤔 How to choose
Universal advice for any use case.
- Reliability vs price: reliability (median 50) ↔ price (median 385.1).
- Weight vs CPU: mobility (median 48) ↔ overall performance (median 49.8).
- Upgradeability vs battery: upgradability (median 50) ↔ battery life (median 2.8).