Component comparison

GeForce RTX 4060 vs GeForce GTX 1650

GeForce RTX 4060 vs GeForce GTX 1650 — detailed GPU comparison: performance, gaming FPS, specifications.

Advantages

A GeForce RTX 4060
  • + Release year (+3)
  • + VRAM (GB) (+4 GB)
  • + Memory clock (MHz) (+500 MHz)
  • + Bandwidth (GB/s) (+144 GB/s)
  • + TGP / TDP (W) (+65 W)
  • + Lithography (nm) (-7 nm)
  • + Transistors (M) (+14,200M)
  • + Die size (mm²) (+41 mm²)
  • + CUDA cores (+2048)
  • + TMUs (+32)
  • + ROPs (+16)
  • + FP32 performance (TFLOPS) (+12.81 TFLOPS)
  • + Pixel fill rate (GPixel/s) (+64.82 GPixel/s)
  • + Texture fill rate (GTexel/s) (+142.96 GTexel/s)
  • + Energy efficiency (+1.6)
  • + PassMark (overall) (+10239)
  • + 3DMark Time Spy (+6841)
  • + 3DMark Fire Strike (+17217)
  • + Geekbench OpenCL (+62501)
  • + Geekbench Vulkan (+63750)
  • + Normalized score (+22.6)
B GeForce GTX 1650

Components are close in specs

Detailed spec comparison

Spec Component A
GeForce RTX 4060
Component B
GeForce GTX 1650
Release year 2023 (+3) 2020
VRAM (GB) 8 GB (+4 GB) 4 GB
Memory type GDDR6 GDDR6
Memory clock (MHz) 2000 MHz (+500 MHz) 1500 MHz
Bandwidth (GB/s) 272 GB/s (+144 GB/s) 128 GB/s
Memory bus (bit) 128 bit 128 bit
TGP / TDP (W) 115 W (+65 W) 50 W
Lithography (nm) 5 nm (-7 nm) 12 nm
Transistors (M) 18,900M (+14,200M) 4,700M
Die size (mm²) 159 mm² (+41 mm²) 200 mm²
Base clock (MHz)
Boost clock (MHz)
CUDA cores 3,072 (+2048) 1,024
TMUs 96 (+32) 64
ROPs 48 (+16) 32
RT cores 24
Tensor cores 96
FP32 performance (TFLOPS) 15.11 TFLOPS (+12.81 TFLOPS) 2.30 TFLOPS
Pixel fill rate (GPixel/s) 118.10 GPixel/s (+64.82 GPixel/s) 53.28 GPixel/s
Texture fill rate (GTexel/s) 236.20 GTexel/s (+142.96 GTexel/s) 93.24 GTexel/s
Energy efficiency 28.0 (+1.6) 26.4
PassMark (overall) 17,355 (+10239) 7,116
3DMark Time Spy 10,329 (+6841) 3,488
3DMark Fire Strike 26,530 (+17217) 9,313
Geekbench OpenCL 101,654 (+62501) 39,153
Geekbench Vulkan 99,998 (+63750) 36,248
Normalized score 75.9 (+22.6) 53.3

Only in component A

DLSS ReBAR ray_tracing

In both

CUDA

FPS in games (1080p)

Game GeForce RTX 4060 GeForce GTX 1650 Delta
A Plague Tale Requiem 73 FPS 26 FPS +180.8% (A)
Alan Wake 2 54 FPS 19 FPS +184.2% (A)
Alan Wake Remastered 145 FPS 63 FPS +130.2% (A)
Armored Core 6 100 FPS 42 FPS +138.1% (A)
Assassin's Creed Mirage 76 FPS 28 FPS +171.4% (A)
Assassin´s Creed Valhalla 111 FPS 21 FPS +428.6% (A)
Atlas Fallen 89 FPS 47 FPS +89.4% (A)
Atomic Heart 63 FPS 30 FPS +110% (A)
Avatar Frontiers of Pandora 32 FPS 13 FPS +146.2% (A)
Back 4 Blood 198 FPS 82 FPS +141.5% (A)
Baldur's Gate 3 69 FPS 33 FPS +109.1% (A)
Battlefield 2042 123 FPS 44 FPS +179.5% (A)
Battlefield 5 130 FPS 60 FPS +116.7% (A)
Borderlands 3 107 FPS 36 FPS +197.2% (A)
CS:GO 240 FPS 240 FPS
Call of Duty Modern Warfare 3 2023 81 FPS 37 FPS +118.9% (A)
Company of Heroes 3 102 FPS 45 FPS +126.7% (A)
Control 89 FPS 32 FPS +178.1% (A)
Counter-Strike 2 195 FPS 131 FPS +48.9% (A)
Counter-Strike 2 157 FPS 80 FPS +96.3% (A)
Crysis Remastered 86 FPS 31 FPS +177.4% (A)
Cyberpunk 2077 123 FPS 52 FPS +136.5% (A)
Cyberpunk 2077 1.6 64 FPS 32 FPS +100% (A)
Days Gone 131 FPS 56 FPS +133.9% (A)
Dead Island 2 154 FPS 50 FPS +208% (A)
Dead Space Remake 54 FPS 22 FPS +145.5% (A)
Death Stranding 150 FPS 57 FPS +163.2% (A)
Diablo 4 180 FPS 72 FPS +150% (A)
Dirt 5 116 FPS 35 FPS +231.4% (A)
Dota 2 164 FPS 96 FPS +70.8% (A)
Dying Light 2 52 FPS 24 FPS +116.7% (A)
EA Sports WRC 85 FPS 26 FPS +226.9% (A)
Elex 2 114 FPS 37 FPS +208.1% (A)
Enshrouded 53 FPS 15 FPS +253.3% (A)
Escape from Tarkov 120 FPS 80 FPS +50% (A)
F1 2021 208 FPS 77 FPS +170.1% (A)
F1 22 125 FPS 74 FPS +68.9% (A)
F1 23 144 FPS 66 FPS +118.2% (A)
Far Cry 5 128 FPS 60 FPS +113.3% (A)
Far Cry 6 101 FPS 47 FPS +114.9% (A)
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark 75 FPS 32 FPS +134.4% (A)
Flight Simulator 2020 69 FPS 26 FPS +165.4% (A)
Fortnite 180 FPS 90 FPS +100% (A)
Forza Horizon 4 160 FPS 82 FPS +95.1% (A)
Forza Horizon 5 238 FPS 73 FPS +226% (A)
GRID Legends 132 FPS 76 FPS +73.7% (A)
GTA V 140 FPS 140 FPS
GTA V 141 FPS 68 FPS +107.4% (A)
Gears Tactics 157 FPS 61 FPS +157.4% (A)
Ghostwire Tokyo 69 FPS 53 FPS +30.2% (A)
God of War 52 FPS 30 FPS +73.3% (A)
Guardians of the Galaxy 135 FPS 46 FPS +193.5% (A)
Halo Infinite 124 FPS 41 FPS +202.4% (A)
High On Life 92 FPS 49 FPS +87.8% (A)
Hitman 3 173 FPS 55 FPS +214.5% (A)
Hogwarts Legacy 71 FPS 29 FPS +144.8% (A)
Immortals of Aveum 53 FPS 26 FPS +103.8% (A)
Lies of P 127 FPS 47 FPS +170.2% (A)
Lords of the Fallen 47 FPS 18 FPS +161.1% (A)
Metro Exodus 25 FPS 33 FPS 32% (B)
Need for Speed Unbound 75 FPS 33 FPS +127.3% (A)
Overwatch 240 FPS 240 FPS
PUBG 140 FPS 140 FPS
Palworld 92 FPS 34 FPS +170.6% (A)
Prince of Persia The Lost Crown 340 FPS 211 FPS +61.1% (A)
Rainbow Six Extraction 141 FPS 69 FPS +104.3% (A)
Ratchet & Clank Rift Apart 59 FPS 15 FPS +293.3% (A)
Ready or Not 148 FPS 64 FPS +131.3% (A)
Resident Evil 4 Remake 124 FPS 46 FPS +169.6% (A)
Returnal 63 FPS 33 FPS +90.9% (A)
Riders Republic 122 FPS 46 FPS +165.2% (A)
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 156 FPS 59 FPS +164.4% (A)
Sons of the Forest 60 FPS 32 FPS +87.5% (A)
Spider-Man Miles Morales 73 FPS 34 FPS +114.7% (A)
Star Wars Jedi Survivor 50 FPS 22 FPS +127.3% (A)
Starfield 47 FPS 18 FPS +161.1% (A)
The Callisto Protocol 78 FPS 53 FPS +47.2% (A)
The Crew Motorfest 60 FPS 33 FPS +81.8% (A)
The Finals 156 FPS 60 FPS +160% (A)
The Last of Us 55 FPS 19 FPS +189.5% (A)
The Quarry 73 FPS 34 FPS +114.7% (A)
The Witcher 3 191 FPS 62 FPS +208.1% (A)
The Witcher 3 110 FPS 45 FPS +144.4% (A)
The Witcher 3 v4 59 FPS 20 FPS +195% (A)
Total War Pharaoh 128 FPS 53 FPS +141.5% (A)
Uncharted Legacy of Thieves Collection 68 FPS 17 FPS +300% (A)
Valorant 240 FPS 164 FPS +46.3% (A)
Vampire Bloodhunt 201 FPS 77 FPS +161% (A)
X-Plane 11.11 61 FPS 45 FPS +35.6% (A)
Yakuza Like a Dragon 117 FPS 38 FPS +207.9% (A)

Specs from public sources (PassMark, Geekbench). FPS measured at 1080p medium settings.

Based on the comparison: GeForce RTX 4060 wins 21 of the comparable criteria. The choice depends on your use case.

🤔 How to choose

Universal advice for any use case.

  • Reliability vs price: reliability (median 50) ↔ price (median 385.1).
  • Weight vs CPU: mobility (median 48) ↔ overall performance (median 49.8).
  • Upgradeability vs battery: upgradability (median 50) ↔ battery life (median 2.8).