Component comparison
GeForce RTX 4060 vs GeForce GTX 1050 Ti
GeForce RTX 4060 vs GeForce GTX 1050 Ti — detailed GPU comparison: performance, gaming FPS, specifications.
Advantages
A
GeForce RTX 4060
- + Release year (+7)
- + VRAM (GB) (+4 GB)
- + Bandwidth (GB/s) (+160 GB/s)
- + TGP / TDP (W) (+40 W)
- + Lithography (nm) (-9 nm)
- + Transistors (M) (+15,600M)
- + CUDA cores (+2304)
- + TMUs (+48)
- + ROPs (+16)
- + FP32 performance (TFLOPS) (+12.93 TFLOPS)
- + Pixel fill rate (GPixel/s) (+73.56 GPixel/s)
- + Texture fill rate (GTexel/s) (+169.38 GTexel/s)
- + Energy efficiency (+12.3)
- + PassMark (overall) (+10992)
- + 3DMark Time Spy (+8068)
- + 3DMark Fire Strike (+19045)
- + Geekbench OpenCL (+81000)
- + Geekbench Vulkan (+80208)
- + Normalized score (+35.1)
B
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti
- + Die size (mm²) (+27 mm²)
Detailed spec comparison
| Spec |
Component A
GeForce RTX 4060
|
Component B
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti
|
|---|---|---|
| Release year | 2023 (+7) | 2016 |
| VRAM (GB) | 8 GB (+4 GB) | 4 GB |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Memory clock (MHz) | 2000 MHz | — |
| Bandwidth (GB/s) | 272 GB/s (+160 GB/s) | 112 GB/s |
| Memory bus (bit) | 128 bit | 128 bit |
| TGP / TDP (W) | 115 W (+40 W) | 75 W |
| Lithography (nm) | 5 nm (-9 nm) | 14 nm |
| Transistors (M) | 18,900M (+15,600M) | 3,300M |
| Die size (mm²) | 159 mm² | 132 mm² (+27 mm²) |
| Base clock (MHz) | — | — |
| Boost clock (MHz) | — | — |
| CUDA cores | 3,072 (+2304) | 768 |
| TMUs | 96 (+48) | 48 |
| ROPs | 48 (+16) | 32 |
| RT cores | 24 | — |
| Tensor cores | 96 | — |
| FP32 performance (TFLOPS) | 15.11 TFLOPS (+12.93 TFLOPS) | 2.18 TFLOPS |
| Pixel fill rate (GPixel/s) | 118.10 GPixel/s (+73.56 GPixel/s) | 44.54 GPixel/s |
| Texture fill rate (GTexel/s) | 236.20 GTexel/s (+169.38 GTexel/s) | 66.82 GTexel/s |
| Energy efficiency | 28.0 (+12.3) | 15.8 |
| PassMark (overall) | 17,355 (+10992) | 6,363 |
| 3DMark Time Spy | 10,329 (+8068) | 2,261 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike | 26,530 (+19045) | 7,485 |
| Geekbench OpenCL | 101,654 (+81000) | 20,654 |
| Geekbench Vulkan | 99,998 (+80208) | 19,790 |
| Normalized score | 75.9 (+35.1) | 40.8 |
Only in component A
DLSS
ReBAR
ray_tracing
In both
CUDA
FPS in games (1080p)
| Game | GeForce RTX 4060 | GeForce GTX 1050 Ti | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alan Wake Remastered | 145 FPS | 29 FPS | +400% (A) |
| Assassin´s Creed Valhalla | 111 FPS | 15 FPS | +640% (A) |
| Battlefield 2042 | 123 FPS | 13 FPS | +846.2% (A) |
| Battlefield 5 | 130 FPS | 57 FPS | +128.1% (A) |
| Borderlands 3 | 107 FPS | 28 FPS | +282.1% (A) |
| CS:GO | 240 FPS | 240 FPS | ≈ |
| Control | 89 FPS | 22 FPS | +304.5% (A) |
| Counter-Strike 2 | 195 FPS | 70 FPS | +178.6% (A) |
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 123 FPS | 27 FPS | +355.6% (A) |
| Cyberpunk 2077 1.6 | 64 FPS | 17 FPS | +276.5% (A) |
| Death Stranding | 150 FPS | 36 FPS | +316.7% (A) |
| Dirt 5 | 116 FPS | 19 FPS | +510.5% (A) |
| Dota 2 | 164 FPS | 98 FPS | +67.3% (A) |
| Dying Light 2 | 52 FPS | 17 FPS | +205.9% (A) |
| Elex 2 | 114 FPS | 21 FPS | +442.9% (A) |
| Escape from Tarkov | 120 FPS | 45 FPS | +166.7% (A) |
| F1 22 | 125 FPS | 48 FPS | +160.4% (A) |
| Far Cry 5 | 128 FPS | 48 FPS | +166.7% (A) |
| Far Cry 6 | 101 FPS | 29 FPS | +248.3% (A) |
| Final Fantasy XV Benchmark | 75 FPS | 23 FPS | +226.1% (A) |
| Flight Simulator 2020 | 69 FPS | 17 FPS | +305.9% (A) |
| Fortnite | 180 FPS | 75 FPS | +140% (A) |
| Forza Horizon 4 | 160 FPS | 67 FPS | +138.8% (A) |
| Forza Horizon 5 | 238 FPS | 40 FPS | +495% (A) |
| GRID Legends | 132 FPS | 42 FPS | +214.3% (A) |
| GTA V | 140 FPS | 140 FPS | ≈ |
| GTA V | 141 FPS | 60 FPS | +135% (A) |
| Gears Tactics | 157 FPS | 49 FPS | +220.4% (A) |
| Ghostwire Tokyo | 69 FPS | 33 FPS | +109.1% (A) |
| God of War | 52 FPS | 12 FPS | +333.3% (A) |
| Hitman 3 | 173 FPS | 40 FPS | +332.5% (A) |
| Metro Exodus | 25 FPS | 31 FPS | 24% (B) |
| Overwatch | 240 FPS | 240 FPS | ≈ |
| PUBG | 140 FPS | 140 FPS | ≈ |
| Rainbow Six Extraction | 141 FPS | 42 FPS | +235.7% (A) |
| Resident Evil 4 Remake | 124 FPS | 24 FPS | +416.7% (A) |
| Riders Republic | 122 FPS | 29 FPS | +320.7% (A) |
| Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 156 FPS | 31 FPS | +403.2% (A) |
| The Quarry | 73 FPS | 24 FPS | +204.2% (A) |
| The Witcher 3 | 191 FPS | 46 FPS | +315.2% (A) |
| The Witcher 3 | 110 FPS | 21 FPS | +423.8% (A) |
| Tiny Tina's Wonderlands | 87 FPS | 24 FPS | +262.5% (A) |
| Valorant | 240 FPS | 110 FPS | +118.2% (A) |
| Vampire Bloodhunt | 201 FPS | 58 FPS | +246.6% (A) |
| X-Plane 11.11 | 61 FPS | 44 FPS | +38.6% (A) |
| Yakuza Like a Dragon | 117 FPS | 33 FPS | +254.5% (A) |
Specs from public sources (PassMark, Geekbench). FPS measured at 1080p medium settings.
Based on the comparison:
GeForce RTX 4060 wins 19 of the comparable criteria.
The choice depends on your use case.
🤔 How to choose
Universal advice for any use case.
- Reliability vs price: reliability (median 50) ↔ price (median 385.1).
- Weight vs CPU: mobility (median 48) ↔ overall performance (median 49.8).
- Upgradeability vs battery: upgradability (median 50) ↔ battery life (median 2.8).