Component comparison
GeForce RTX 4060 vs GeForce 940M
GeForce RTX 4060 vs GeForce 940M — detailed GPU comparison: performance, gaming FPS, specifications.
Advantages
A
GeForce RTX 4060
- + Release year (+8)
- + VRAM (GB) (+6 GB)
- + Memory clock (MHz) (+1100 MHz)
- + Bandwidth (GB/s) (+258 GB/s)
- + Memory bus (bit) (+64 bit)
- + TGP / TDP (W) (+40 W)
- + Lithography (nm) (-23 nm)
- + Transistors (M) (+17,030M)
- + CUDA cores (+2688)
- + TMUs (+72)
- + ROPs (+40)
- + FP32 performance (TFLOPS) (+14.21 TFLOPS)
- + Pixel fill rate (GPixel/s) (+100.53 GPixel/s)
- + Texture fill rate (GTexel/s) (+201.06 GTexel/s)
- + Energy efficiency (+21.7)
- + PassMark (overall) (+16222)
- + 3DMark Fire Strike (+24908)
- + Geekbench OpenCL (+95629)
- + Geekbench Vulkan (+95449)
- + Normalized score (+69.7)
B
GeForce 940M
- + Die size (mm²) (+11 mm²)
Detailed spec comparison
| Spec |
Component A
GeForce RTX 4060
|
Component B
GeForce 940M
|
|---|---|---|
| Release year | 2023 (+8) | 2015 |
| VRAM (GB) | 8 GB (+6 GB) | 2 GB |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | DDR3 |
| Memory clock (MHz) | 2000 MHz (+1100 MHz) | 900 MHz |
| Bandwidth (GB/s) | 272 GB/s (+258 GB/s) | 14 GB/s |
| Memory bus (bit) | 128 bit (+64 bit) | 64 bit |
| TGP / TDP (W) | 115 W (+40 W) | 75 W |
| Lithography (nm) | 5 nm (-23 nm) | 28 nm |
| Transistors (M) | 18,900M (+17,030M) | 1,870M |
| Die size (mm²) | 159 mm² | 148 mm² (+11 mm²) |
| Base clock (MHz) | — | 1020 MHz |
| Boost clock (MHz) | — | 1098 MHz |
| CUDA cores | 3,072 (+2688) | 384 |
| TMUs | 96 (+72) | 24 |
| ROPs | 48 (+40) | 8 |
| RT cores | 24 | — |
| Tensor cores | 96 | — |
| FP32 performance (TFLOPS) | 15.11 TFLOPS (+14.21 TFLOPS) | 0.90 TFLOPS |
| Pixel fill rate (GPixel/s) | 118.10 GPixel/s (+100.53 GPixel/s) | 17.57 GPixel/s |
| Texture fill rate (GTexel/s) | 236.20 GTexel/s (+201.06 GTexel/s) | 35.14 GTexel/s |
| Energy efficiency | 28.0 (+21.7) | 6.4 |
| PassMark (overall) | 17,355 (+16222) | 1,133 |
| 3DMark Time Spy | 10,329 | — |
| 3DMark Fire Strike | 26,530 (+24908) | 1,622 |
| Geekbench OpenCL | 101,654 (+95629) | 6,025 |
| Geekbench Vulkan | 99,998 (+95449) | 4,549 |
| Normalized score | 75.9 (+69.7) | 6.2 |
Only in component A
DLSS
ReBAR
ray_tracing
In both
CUDA
FPS in games (1080p)
| Game | GeForce RTX 4060 | GeForce 940M | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|
| Battlefield 5 | 130 FPS | 17 FPS | +664.7% (A) |
| CS:GO | 240 FPS | 240 FPS | ≈ |
| Counter-Strike 2 | 195 FPS | 9 FPS | +2066.7% (A) |
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 123 FPS | 5 FPS | +2360% (A) |
| Dota 2 | 164 FPS | 49 FPS | +234.7% (A) |
| Far Cry 5 | 128 FPS | 11 FPS | +1063.6% (A) |
| Fortnite | 180 FPS | 36 FPS | +400% (A) |
| Forza Horizon 4 | 160 FPS | 14 FPS | +1042.9% (A) |
| Forza Horizon 5 | 238 FPS | 6 FPS | +3866.7% (A) |
| GTA V | 140 FPS | 140 FPS | ≈ |
| GTA V | 141 FPS | 14 FPS | +907.1% (A) |
| Metro Exodus | 25 FPS | 2 FPS | +1150% (A) |
| Overwatch | 240 FPS | 240 FPS | ≈ |
| PUBG | 140 FPS | 140 FPS | ≈ |
| Resident Evil 4 Remake | 124 FPS | 3 FPS | +4033.3% (A) |
| The Witcher 3 | 191 FPS | 10 FPS | +1810% (A) |
| The Witcher 3 | 110 FPS | 10 FPS | +1000% (A) |
| Valorant | 240 FPS | 40 FPS | +500% (A) |
Specs from public sources (PassMark, Geekbench). FPS measured at 1080p medium settings.
Based on the comparison:
GeForce RTX 4060 wins 20 of the comparable criteria.
The choice depends on your use case.
🤔 How to choose
Universal advice for any use case.
- Reliability vs price: reliability (median 50) ↔ price (median 385.1).
- Weight vs CPU: mobility (median 48) ↔ overall performance (median 49.8).
- Upgradeability vs battery: upgradability (median 50) ↔ battery life (median 2.8).