Component comparison
GeForce RTX 3080 vs Quadro T1000
GeForce RTX 3080 vs Quadro T1000 — detailed GPU comparison: performance, gaming FPS, specifications.
Advantages
A
GeForce RTX 3080
- + Release year (+2)
- + VRAM (GB) (+4 GB)
- + Memory bus (bit) (+192 bit)
- + TGP / TDP (W) (+65 W)
- + Lithography (nm) (-4 nm)
- + CUDA cores (+7936)
- + Energy efficiency (+1.8)
- + PassMark (overall) (+9562)
- + Geekbench OpenCL (+133164)
- + Geekbench Vulkan (+115451)
- + Normalized score (+36.9)
B
Quadro T1000
- + Memory clock (MHz) (+6250 MHz)
Detailed spec comparison
| Spec |
Component A
GeForce RTX 3080
|
Component B
Quadro T1000
|
|---|---|---|
| Release year | 2021 (+2) | 2019 |
| VRAM (GB) | 8 GB (+4 GB) | 4 GB |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Memory clock (MHz) | 1750 MHz | 8000 MHz (+6250 MHz) |
| Bandwidth (GB/s) | 760 GB/s | — |
| Memory bus (bit) | 320 bit (+192 bit) | 128 bit |
| TGP / TDP (W) | 115 W (+65 W) | 50 W |
| Lithography (nm) | 8 nm (-4 nm) | 12 nm |
| Transistors (M) | 28,300M | — |
| Die size (mm²) | 628 mm² | — |
| Base clock (MHz) | — | — |
| Boost clock (MHz) | — | 1455 MHz |
| CUDA cores | 8,704 (+7936) | 768 |
| TMUs | 272 | — |
| ROPs | 96 | — |
| RT cores | 68 | — |
| Tensor cores | 272 | — |
| FP32 performance (TFLOPS) | 29.77 TFLOPS | — |
| Pixel fill rate (GPixel/s) | 164.20 GPixel/s | — |
| Texture fill rate (GTexel/s) | 465.10 GTexel/s | — |
| Energy efficiency | 26.0 (+1.8) | 24.1 |
| PassMark (overall) | 16,075 (+9562) | 6,513 |
| 3DMark Time Spy | 10,752 | — |
| 3DMark Fire Strike | 27,194 | — |
| Geekbench OpenCL | 167,014 (+133164) | 33,850 |
| Geekbench Vulkan | 145,176 (+115451) | 29,725 |
| Normalized score | 82.8 (+36.9) | 45.9 |
Only in component A
DLSS
ReBAR
ray_tracing
In both
CUDA
FPS in games (1080p)
| Game | GeForce RTX 3080 | Quadro T1000 | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|
| Anno 1800 | 78 FPS | 37 FPS | +110.8% (A) |
| Apex Legends | 144 FPS | 58 FPS | +148.3% (A) |
| Assassin´s Creed Odyssey | 104 FPS | 35 FPS | +197.1% (A) |
| Battlefield 5 | 130 FPS | 38 FPS | +242.1% (A) |
| Borderlands 3 | 95 FPS | 38 FPS | +150% (A) |
| CS:GO | 240 FPS | 240 FPS | ≈ |
| Control | 82 FPS | 31 FPS | +164.5% (A) |
| Doom Eternal | 165 FPS | 64 FPS | +157.8% (A) |
| Dota 2 | 134 FPS | 113 FPS | +18.6% (A) |
| Escape from Tarkov | 120 FPS | 68 FPS | +76.5% (A) |
| Far Cry 5 | 129 FPS | 57 FPS | +126.3% (A) |
| Far Cry New Dawn | 68 FPS | 46 FPS | +47.8% (A) |
| Final Fantasy XV Benchmark | 56 FPS | 31 FPS | +80.6% (A) |
| GRID 2019 | 113 FPS | 65 FPS | +73.8% (A) |
| GTA V | 140 FPS | 140 FPS | ≈ |
| GTA V | 137 FPS | 94 FPS | +45.7% (A) |
| Gears Tactics | 136 FPS | 58 FPS | +134.5% (A) |
| Hunt Showdown | 110 FPS | 44 FPS | +150% (A) |
| Metro Exodus | 100 FPS | 32 FPS | +212.5% (A) |
| Need for Speed Heat | 94 FPS | 52 FPS | +80.8% (A) |
| Overwatch | 240 FPS | 240 FPS | ≈ |
| PUBG | 140 FPS | 140 FPS | ≈ |
| Rage 2 | 116 FPS | 46 FPS | +152.2% (A) |
| Red Dead Redemption 2 | 85 FPS | 30 FPS | +183.3% (A) |
| Rise of the Tomb Raider | 157 FPS | 53 FPS | +196.2% (A) |
| Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 165 FPS | 40 FPS | +312.5% (A) |
| Star Wars Jedi Fallen Order | 98 FPS | 58 FPS | +69% (A) |
| The Division 2 | 105 FPS | 36 FPS | +191.7% (A) |
| The Witcher 3 | 149 FPS | 53 FPS | +181.1% (A) |
| Total War: Three Kingdoms | 108 FPS | 38 FPS | +184.2% (A) |
| X-Plane 11.11 | 66 FPS | 57 FPS | +15.8% (A) |
Specs from public sources (PassMark, Geekbench). FPS measured at 1080p medium settings.
Based on the comparison:
GeForce RTX 3080 wins 11 of the comparable criteria.
The choice depends on your use case.
🤔 How to choose
Universal advice for any use case.
- Reliability vs price: reliability (median 50) ↔ price (median 385.1).
- Weight vs CPU: mobility (median 48) ↔ overall performance (median 49.8).
- Upgradeability vs battery: upgradability (median 50) ↔ battery life (median 2.8).