Component comparison

GeForce RTX 3080 vs GeForce GTX 1050 Ti

GeForce RTX 3080 vs GeForce GTX 1050 Ti — detailed GPU comparison: performance, gaming FPS, specifications.

Advantages

A GeForce RTX 3080
  • + Release year (+5)
  • + VRAM (GB) (+4 GB)
  • + Bandwidth (GB/s) (+648 GB/s)
  • + Memory bus (bit) (+192 bit)
  • + TGP / TDP (W) (+40 W)
  • + Lithography (nm) (-6 nm)
  • + Transistors (M) (+25,000M)
  • + CUDA cores (+7936)
  • + TMUs (+224)
  • + ROPs (+64)
  • + FP32 performance (TFLOPS) (+27.59 TFLOPS)
  • + Pixel fill rate (GPixel/s) (+119.66 GPixel/s)
  • + Texture fill rate (GTexel/s) (+398.28 GTexel/s)
  • + Energy efficiency (+10.2)
  • + PassMark (overall) (+9712)
  • + 3DMark Time Spy (+8491)
  • + 3DMark Fire Strike (+19709)
  • + Geekbench OpenCL (+146360)
  • + Geekbench Vulkan (+125386)
  • + Normalized score (+42.1)
B GeForce GTX 1050 Ti
  • + Die size (mm²) (+496 mm²)

Detailed spec comparison

Spec Component A
GeForce RTX 3080
 Component B
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti
Release year 2021 (+5) 2016
VRAM (GB) 8 GB (+4 GB) 4 GB
Memory type GDDR6 GDDR5
Memory clock (MHz) 1750 MHz —
Bandwidth (GB/s) 760 GB/s (+648 GB/s) 112 GB/s
Memory bus (bit) 320 bit (+192 bit) 128 bit
TGP / TDP (W) 115 W (+40 W) 75 W
Lithography (nm) 8 nm (-6 nm) 14 nm
Transistors (M) 28,300M (+25,000M) 3,300M
Die size (mm²) 628 mm² 132 mm² (+496 mm²)
Base clock (MHz) — —
Boost clock (MHz) — —
CUDA cores 8,704 (+7936) 768
TMUs 272 (+224) 48
ROPs 96 (+64) 32
RT cores 68 —
Tensor cores 272 —
FP32 performance (TFLOPS) 29.77 TFLOPS (+27.59 TFLOPS) 2.18 TFLOPS
Pixel fill rate (GPixel/s) 164.20 GPixel/s (+119.66 GPixel/s) 44.54 GPixel/s
Texture fill rate (GTexel/s) 465.10 GTexel/s (+398.28 GTexel/s) 66.82 GTexel/s
Energy efficiency 26.0 (+10.2) 15.8
PassMark (overall) 16,075 (+9712) 6,363
3DMark Time Spy 10,752 (+8491) 2,261
3DMark Fire Strike 27,194 (+19709) 7,485
Geekbench OpenCL 167,014 (+146360) 20,654
Geekbench Vulkan 145,176 (+125386) 19,790
Normalized score 82.8 (+42.1) 40.8

Only in component A

DLSS ReBAR ray_tracing

In both

CUDA

FPS in games (1080p)

Game GeForce RTX 3080 GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Delta
Alan Wake Remastered 95 FPS 29 FPS +227.6% (A)
Anno 1800 78 FPS 39 FPS +100% (A)
Apex Legends 144 FPS 43 FPS +234.9% (A)
Assassin´s Creed Odyssey 104 FPS 31 FPS +235.5% (A)
Assassin´s Creed Origins 118 FPS 38 FPS +210.5% (A)
Assassin´s Creed Valhalla 72 FPS 15 FPS +380% (A)
Battlefield 2042 100 FPS 13 FPS +669.2% (A)
Battlefield 5 130 FPS 57 FPS +128.1% (A)
Borderlands 3 95 FPS 28 FPS +239.3% (A)
CS:GO 240 FPS 240 FPS ≈
Call of Duty Black Ops Cold War 89 FPS 22 FPS +304.5% (A)
Call of Duty Vanguard 125 FPS 24 FPS +420.8% (A)
Control 82 FPS 22 FPS +272.7% (A)
Counter-Strike 2 212 FPS 70 FPS +202.9% (A)
Cyberpunk 2077 121 FPS 27 FPS +348.1% (A)
Cyberpunk 2077 1.6 83 FPS 17 FPS +388.2% (A)
Death Stranding 84 FPS 36 FPS +133.3% (A)
Deathloop 113 FPS 21 FPS +438.1% (A)
Dirt 5 62 FPS 19 FPS +226.3% (A)
Dota 2 134 FPS 98 FPS +36.7% (A)
Dying Light 2 87 FPS 17 FPS +411.8% (A)
Elden Ring 59 FPS 26 FPS +126.9% (A)
Elex 2 88 FPS 21 FPS +319% (A)
Escape from Tarkov 120 FPS 45 FPS +166.7% (A)
F1 2020 162 FPS 63 FPS +157.1% (A)
F1 22 195 FPS 48 FPS +306.3% (A)
FIFA 21 198 FPS 142 FPS +39.4% (A)
Far Cry 5 129 FPS 48 FPS +168.8% (A)
Far Cry 6 65 FPS 29 FPS +124.1% (A)
Far Cry New Dawn 68 FPS 42 FPS +61.9% (A)
Farming Simulator 22 165 FPS 46 FPS +258.7% (A)
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark 56 FPS 23 FPS +143.5% (A)
Fortnite 160 FPS 75 FPS +113.3% (A)
Forza Horizon 4 194 FPS 67 FPS +189.6% (A)
Forza Horizon 5 152 FPS 40 FPS +280% (A)
GRID 2019 113 FPS 34 FPS +232.4% (A)
GRID Legends 131 FPS 42 FPS +211.9% (A)
GTA V 140 FPS 140 FPS ≈
GTA V 137 FPS 60 FPS +128.3% (A)
Gears Tactics 136 FPS 49 FPS +177.6% (A)
Ghostwire Tokyo 149 FPS 33 FPS +351.5% (A)
God of War 91 FPS 12 FPS +658.3% (A)
Hitman 3 131 FPS 40 FPS +227.5% (A)
Horizon Zero Dawn 89 FPS 31 FPS +187.1% (A)
Hunt Showdown 110 FPS 34 FPS +223.5% (A)
Immortals Fenyx Rising 88 FPS 23 FPS +282.6% (A)
Mafia Definitive Edition 99 FPS 33 FPS +200% (A)
Metro Exodus 100 FPS 31 FPS +222.6% (A)
Need for Speed Heat 94 FPS 42 FPS +123.8% (A)
Overwatch 240 FPS 240 FPS ≈
PUBG 140 FPS 140 FPS ≈
Rage 2 116 FPS 32 FPS +262.5% (A)
Rainbow Six Extraction 218 FPS 42 FPS +419% (A)
Resident Evil 4 Remake 140 FPS 24 FPS +483.3% (A)
Riders Republic 113 FPS 29 FPS +289.7% (A)
Rise of the Tomb Raider 157 FPS 33 FPS +375.8% (A)
Serious Sam 4 75 FPS 22 FPS +240.9% (A)
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 165 FPS 31 FPS +432.3% (A)
Star Wars Jedi Fallen Order 98 FPS 47 FPS +108.5% (A)
Star Wars Squadrons 198 FPS 85 FPS +132.9% (A)
The Division 2 105 FPS 35 FPS +200% (A)
The Quarry 97 FPS 24 FPS +304.2% (A)
The Witcher 3 191 FPS 46 FPS +315.2% (A)
The Witcher 3 149 FPS 21 FPS +609.5% (A)
Tiny Tina's Wonderlands 113 FPS 24 FPS +370.8% (A)
Valorant 220 FPS 110 FPS +100% (A)
Vampire Bloodhunt 238 FPS 58 FPS +310.3% (A)
Watch Dogs Legion 80 FPS 27 FPS +196.3% (A)
X-Plane 11.11 66 FPS 44 FPS +50% (A)
Yakuza Like a Dragon 112 FPS 33 FPS +239.4% (A)

Specs from public sources (PassMark, Geekbench). FPS measured at 1080p medium settings.

Based on the comparison: GeForce RTX 3080 wins 20 of the comparable criteria. The choice depends on your use case.

🤔 How to choose

Universal advice for any use case.

  • Reliability vs price: reliability (median 50) ↔ price (median 385.1).
  • Weight vs CPU: mobility (median 48) ↔ overall performance (median 49.8).
  • Upgradeability vs battery: upgradability (median 50) ↔ battery life (median 2.8).
All reviews