Component comparison

GeForce RTX 3080 Ti vs GeForce RTX 2050

GeForce RTX 3080 Ti vs GeForce RTX 2050 β€” detailed GPU comparison: performance, gaming FPS, specifications.

Advantages

A GeForce RTX 3080 Ti
  • + VRAM (GB) (+8 GB)
  • + Bandwidth (GB/s) (+800 GB/s)
  • + Memory bus (bit) (+320 bit)
  • + Transistors (M) (+19,600M)
  • + CUDA cores (+8192)
  • + TMUs (+256)
  • + ROPs (+80)
  • + RT cores (+48)
  • + Tensor cores (+256)
  • + FP32 performance (TFLOPS) (+29.37 TFLOPS)
  • + Pixel fill rate (GPixel/s) (+146.66 GPixel/s)
  • + Texture fill rate (GTexel/s) (+453.12 GTexel/s)
  • + 3DMark Fire Strike (+38148)
  • + Geekbench OpenCL (+164802)
  • + Normalized score (+11.1)
B GeForce RTX 2050
  • + Die size (mmΒ²) (+428 mmΒ²)
  • + Energy efficiency (+15.4)

Detailed spec comparison

Spec Component A
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti
Component B
GeForce RTX 2050
Release year 2021 2021
VRAM (GB) 12 GB (+8 GB) 4 GB
Memory type GDDR6X GDDR6
Memory clock (MHz) β€” 1750 MHz
Bandwidth (GB/s) 912 GB/s (+800 GB/s) 112 GB/s
Memory bus (bit) 384 bit (+320 bit) 64 bit
TGP / TDP (W) β€” 45 W
Lithography (nm) 8 nm 8 nm
Transistors (M) 28,300M (+19,600M) 8,700M
Die size (mmΒ²) 628 mmΒ² 200 mmΒ² (+428 mmΒ²)
Base clock (MHz) β€” 735 MHz
Boost clock (MHz) β€” 1245 MHz
CUDA cores 10,240 (+8192) 2,048
TMUs 320 (+256) 64
ROPs 112 (+80) 32
RT cores 80 (+48) 32
Tensor cores 320 (+256) 64
FP32 performance (TFLOPS) 34.10 TFLOPS (+29.37 TFLOPS) 4.73 TFLOPS
Pixel fill rate (GPixel/s) 186.50 GPixel/s (+146.66 GPixel/s) 39.84 GPixel/s
Texture fill rate (GTexel/s) 532.80 GTexel/s (+453.12 GTexel/s) 79.68 GTexel/s
Energy efficiency 14.2 29.6 (+15.4)
PassMark (overall) 26,760 β€”
3DMark Time Spy β€” 3,221
3DMark Fire Strike 47,113 (+38148) 8,965
Geekbench OpenCL 209,081 (+164802) 44,279
Geekbench Vulkan β€” 43,030
Normalized score 66.3 (+11.1) 55.2

Only in component A

ray_tracing

In both

CUDA DLSS ReBAR

FPS in games (1080p)

Game GeForce RTX 3080 Ti GeForce RTX 2050 Delta
A Plague Tale Requiem 64 FPS 21 FPS +204.8% (A)
Alan Wake 2 76 FPS 14 FPS +442.9% (A)
Alan Wake Remastered 119 FPS 50 FPS +138% (A)
Armored Core 6 115 FPS 32 FPS +259.4% (A)
Assassin's Creed Mirage 109 FPS 25 FPS +336% (A)
AssassinΒ΄s Creed Valhalla 99 FPS 21 FPS +371.4% (A)
Atlas Fallen 162 FPS 43 FPS +276.7% (A)
Atomic Heart 100 FPS 30 FPS +233.3% (A)
Avatar Frontiers of Pandora 73 FPS 12 FPS +508.3% (A)
Back 4 Blood 263 FPS 66 FPS +298.5% (A)
Baldur's Gate 3 111 FPS 30 FPS +270% (A)
Battlefield 5 170 FPS β‰ˆ 70 FPS +142.9% (A)
CS:GO 240 FPS β‰ˆ 240 FPS β‰ˆ
Call of Duty Modern Warfare 2 2022 109 FPS 18 FPS +505.6% (A)
Company of Heroes 3 175 FPS 27 FPS +548.1% (A)
Counter-Strike 2 300 FPS β‰ˆ 74 FPS +305.4% (A)
Counter-Strike 2 194 FPS 46 FPS +321.7% (A)
Crysis Remastered 103 FPS 25 FPS +312% (A)
Cyberpunk 2077 219 FPS 18 FPS +1116.7% (A)
Cyberpunk 2077 1.6 64 FPS 19 FPS +236.8% (A)
Days Gone 177 FPS 45 FPS +293.3% (A)
Dead Space Remake 95 FPS 20 FPS +375% (A)
Death Stranding 151 FPS 50 FPS +202% (A)
Deathloop 133 FPS 30 FPS +343.3% (A)
Diablo 4 238 FPS 39 FPS +510.3% (A)
Dota 2 234 FPS 71 FPS +229.6% (A)
Dragon's Dogma 2 70 FPS 15 FPS +366.7% (A)
Dying Light 2 69 FPS 24 FPS +187.5% (A)
EA Sports WRC 101 FPS 20 FPS +405% (A)
Elex 2 43 FPS 32 FPS +34.4% (A)
F1 2021 182 FPS 66 FPS +175.8% (A)
F1 22 172 FPS 55 FPS +212.7% (A)
F1 23 193 FPS 37 FPS +421.6% (A)
FIFA 23 81 FPS 40 FPS +102.5% (A)
Far Cry 5 208 FPS 35 FPS +494.3% (A)
Far Cry 6 91 FPS 43 FPS +111.6% (A)
Farming Simulator 22 183 FPS 63 FPS +190.5% (A)
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark 31 FPS 25 FPS +24% (A)
Flight Simulator 2020 79 FPS 19 FPS +315.8% (A)
Fortnite 300 FPS β‰ˆ 95 FPS +215.8% (A)
Forza Horizon 4 250 FPS β‰ˆ 70 FPS +257.1% (A)
Forza Horizon 5 200 FPS 53 FPS +277.4% (A)
GRID Legends 117 FPS 61 FPS +91.8% (A)
GTA V 140 FPS β‰ˆ 140 FPS β‰ˆ
GTA V 153 FPS 74 FPS +106.8% (A)
Gears Tactics 196 FPS 55 FPS +256.4% (A)
Ghostwire Tokyo 126 FPS 51 FPS +147.1% (A)
God of War 110 FPS 29 FPS +279.3% (A)
Guardians of the Galaxy 112 FPS 47 FPS +138.3% (A)
Halo Infinite 147 FPS 41 FPS +258.5% (A)
High On Life 154 FPS 35 FPS +340% (A)
Hitman 3 197 FPS 59 FPS +233.9% (A)
Hogwarts Legacy 89 FPS 26 FPS +242.3% (A)
Hunt Showdown 168 FPS 54 FPS +211.1% (A)
Immortals of Aveum 63 FPS 17 FPS +270.6% (A)
Lies of P 158 FPS 29 FPS +444.8% (A)
Lords of the Fallen 64 FPS 11 FPS +481.8% (A)
Mafia Definitive Edition 151 FPS 39 FPS +287.2% (A)
Metro Exodus 172 FPS β‰ˆ 35 FPS +391.4% (A)
Need for Speed Unbound 107 FPS 28 FPS +282.1% (A)
Outriders 155 FPS 34 FPS +355.9% (A)
Overwatch 240 FPS β‰ˆ 240 FPS β‰ˆ
PUBG 140 FPS β‰ˆ 140 FPS β‰ˆ
Rainbow Six Extraction 157 FPS 66 FPS +137.9% (A)
Ratchet & Clank Rift Apart 94 FPS 18 FPS +422.2% (A)
Ready or Not 208 FPS 75 FPS +177.3% (A)
Resident Evil 4 Remake 190 FPS 17 FPS +1017.6% (A)
Resident Evil Village 232 FPS 58 FPS +300% (A)
Returnal 114 FPS 21 FPS +442.9% (A)
Riders Republic 101 FPS 38 FPS +165.8% (A)
Serious Sam 4 109 FPS 32 FPS +240.6% (A)
Sons of the Forest 86 FPS 34 FPS +152.9% (A)
Spider-Man Miles Morales 117 FPS 32 FPS +265.6% (A)
Star Wars Jedi Survivor 79 FPS 20 FPS +295% (A)
Star Wars Squadrons 378 FPS 111 FPS +240.5% (A)
Starfield 58 FPS 16 FPS +262.5% (A)
The Crew Motorfest 60 FPS 24 FPS +150% (A)
The Finals 190 FPS 68 FPS +179.4% (A)
The Last of Us 88 FPS 18 FPS +388.9% (A)
The Quarry 126 FPS 31 FPS +306.5% (A)
The Witcher 3 372 FPS β‰ˆ 58 FPS +541.4% (A)
The Witcher 3 144 FPS 47 FPS +206.4% (A)
The Witcher 3 v4 168 FPS 19 FPS +784.2% (A)
Tiny Tina's Wonderlands 124 FPS 38 FPS +226.3% (A)
Total War Pharaoh 157 FPS 30 FPS +423.3% (A)
Uncharted Legacy of Thieves Collection 86 FPS 13 FPS +561.5% (A)
Valorant 350 FPS β‰ˆ 130 FPS +169.2% (A)
Vampire Bloodhunt 252 FPS 73 FPS +245.2% (A)
Watch Dogs Legion 107 FPS 39 FPS +174.4% (A)
X-Plane 11.11 33 FPS 59 FPS 78.8% (B)
Yakuza Like a Dragon 160 FPS 43 FPS +272.1% (A)

Specs from public sources (PassMark, Geekbench). FPS measured at 1080p medium settings. Values for GeForce RTX 2050 are model predictions (β‰ˆ); GeForce RTX 3080 Ti are direct measurements.

Based on the comparison: GeForce RTX 3080 Ti wins 15 of the comparable criteria. The choice depends on your use case.

πŸ€” How to choose

Universal advice for any use case.

  • Reliability vs price: reliability (median 50) ↔ price (median 385.1).
  • Weight vs CPU: mobility (median 48) ↔ overall performance (median 49.8).
  • Upgradeability vs battery: upgradability (median 50) ↔ battery life (median 2.8).