Component comparison

GeForce RTX 3080 Ti vs GeForce MX350

GeForce RTX 3080 Ti vs GeForce MX350 — detailed GPU comparison: performance, gaming FPS, specifications.

Advantages

A GeForce RTX 3080 Ti
  • + Release year (+1)
  • + VRAM (GB) (+10 GB)
  • + Bandwidth (GB/s) (+856 GB/s)
  • + Memory bus (bit) (+320 bit)
  • + Lithography (nm) (-6 nm)
  • + Transistors (M) (+25,000M)
  • + CUDA cores (+9600)
  • + TMUs (+288)
  • + ROPs (+96)
  • + FP32 performance (TFLOPS) (+32.90 TFLOPS)
  • + Pixel fill rate (GPixel/s) (+163.01 GPixel/s)
  • + Texture fill rate (GTexel/s) (+485.82 GTexel/s)
  • + PassMark (overall) (+23942)
  • + 3DMark Fire Strike (+42742)
  • + Geekbench OpenCL (+195969)
  • + Normalized score (+35.5)
B GeForce MX350
  • + Die size (mm²) (+496 mm²)
  • + Energy efficiency (+12.0)

Detailed spec comparison

Spec Component A
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti
 Component B
GeForce MX350
Release year 2021 (+1) 2020
VRAM (GB) 12 GB (+10 GB) 2 GB
Memory type GDDR6X GDDR5
Memory clock (MHz) — 1752 MHz
Bandwidth (GB/s) 912 GB/s (+856 GB/s) 56 GB/s
Memory bus (bit) 384 bit (+320 bit) 64 bit
TGP / TDP (W) — 20 W
Lithography (nm) 8 nm (-6 nm) 14 nm
Transistors (M) 28,300M (+25,000M) 3,300M
Die size (mm²) 628 mm² 132 mm² (+496 mm²)
Base clock (MHz) — 1354 MHz
Boost clock (MHz) — 1468 MHz
CUDA cores 10,240 (+9600) 640
TMUs 320 (+288) 32
ROPs 112 (+96) 16
RT cores 80 —
Tensor cores 320 —
FP32 performance (TFLOPS) 34.10 TFLOPS (+32.90 TFLOPS) 1.20 TFLOPS
Pixel fill rate (GPixel/s) 186.50 GPixel/s (+163.01 GPixel/s) 23.49 GPixel/s
Texture fill rate (GTexel/s) 532.80 GTexel/s (+485.82 GTexel/s) 46.98 GTexel/s
Energy efficiency 14.2 26.1 (+12.0)
PassMark (overall) 26,760 (+23942) 2,818
3DMark Time Spy — 1,336
3DMark Fire Strike 47,113 (+42742) 4,371
Geekbench OpenCL 209,081 (+195969) 13,112
Geekbench Vulkan — 13,369
Normalized score 66.3 (+35.5) 30.8

Only in component A

DLSS ReBAR ray_tracing

In both

CUDA

FPS in games (1080p)

Game GeForce RTX 3080 Ti GeForce MX350 Delta
A Plague Tale Requiem 64 FPS 8 FPS +700% (A)
Armored Core 6 115 FPS 10 FPS +1050% (A)
Assassin´s Creed Valhalla 99 FPS 6 FPS +1550% (A)
Atomic Heart 100 FPS 7 FPS +1328.6% (A)
Back 4 Blood 263 FPS 29 FPS +806.9% (A)
Baldur's Gate 3 111 FPS 11 FPS +909.1% (A)
Battlefield 5 170 FPS 37 FPS +359.5% (A)
Borderlands 3 100 FPS 17 FPS +488.2% (A)
CS:GO 240 FPS 240 FPS ≈
Call of Duty Modern Warfare 2 2022 109 FPS 14 FPS +678.6% (A)
Counter-Strike 2 300 FPS 66 FPS +354.5% (A)
Counter-Strike 2 194 FPS 31 FPS +525.8% (A)
Crysis Remastered 103 FPS 9 FPS +1044.4% (A)
Cyberpunk 2077 219 FPS 16 FPS +1268.8% (A)
Cyberpunk 2077 1.0 101 FPS 7 FPS +1342.9% (A)
Cyberpunk 2077 1.6 64 FPS 6 FPS +966.7% (A)
Days Gone 177 FPS 24 FPS +637.5% (A)
Death Stranding 151 FPS 17 FPS +788.2% (A)
Deathloop 133 FPS 7 FPS +1800% (A)
Diablo 4 238 FPS 27 FPS +781.5% (A)
Dirt 5 137 FPS 7 FPS +1857.1% (A)
Dota 2 234 FPS 83 FPS +181.9% (A)
F1 2020 255 FPS 33 FPS +672.7% (A)
F1 2021 182 FPS 31 FPS +487.1% (A)
F1 22 172 FPS 20 FPS +760% (A)
F1 23 193 FPS 14 FPS +1278.6% (A)
Far Cry 5 208 FPS 27 FPS +670.4% (A)
Far Cry 6 91 FPS 11 FPS +727.3% (A)
Far Cry New Dawn 108 FPS 25 FPS +332% (A)
Farming Simulator 22 183 FPS 32 FPS +471.9% (A)
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark 31 FPS 11 FPS +181.8% (A)
Flight Simulator 2020 79 FPS 9 FPS +777.8% (A)
Fortnite 300 FPS 82 FPS +265.9% (A)
Forza Horizon 4 250 FPS 37 FPS +575.7% (A)
Forza Horizon 5 200 FPS 25 FPS +700% (A)
GRID Legends 117 FPS 25 FPS +368% (A)
GTA V 140 FPS 140 FPS ≈
GTA V 153 FPS 46 FPS +232.6% (A)
Gears Tactics 196 FPS 30 FPS +553.3% (A)
Ghostwire Tokyo 126 FPS 15 FPS +740% (A)
Hitman 3 197 FPS 19 FPS +936.8% (A)
Horizon Zero Dawn 130 FPS 12 FPS +983.3% (A)
Hunt Showdown 168 FPS 21 FPS +700% (A)
Lies of P 158 FPS 19 FPS +731.6% (A)
Mafia Definitive Edition 151 FPS 19 FPS +694.7% (A)
Metro Exodus 172 FPS 12 FPS +1333.3% (A)
Outriders 155 FPS 22 FPS +604.5% (A)
Overwatch 240 FPS 240 FPS ≈
PUBG 140 FPS 140 FPS ≈
Rainbow Six Extraction 157 FPS 18 FPS +772.2% (A)
Ready or Not 208 FPS 32 FPS +550% (A)
Resident Evil 4 Remake 190 FPS 18 FPS +955.6% (A)
Resident Evil Village 232 FPS 14 FPS +1557.1% (A)
Riders Republic 101 FPS 15 FPS +573.3% (A)
Serious Sam 4 109 FPS 4 FPS +2625% (A)
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 156 FPS 25 FPS +524% (A)
Sons of the Forest 86 FPS 13 FPS +561.5% (A)
Star Wars Squadrons 378 FPS 50 FPS +656% (A)
The Callisto Protocol 95 FPS 10 FPS +850% (A)
The Finals 190 FPS 17 FPS +1017.6% (A)
The Quarry 126 FPS 11 FPS +1045.5% (A)
The Witcher 3 372 FPS 27 FPS +1277.8% (A)
The Witcher 3 144 FPS 21 FPS +585.7% (A)
The Witcher 3 v4 168 FPS 7 FPS +2300% (A)
Tiny Tina's Wonderlands 124 FPS 8 FPS +1450% (A)
Total War Pharaoh 157 FPS 23 FPS +582.6% (A)
Valorant 350 FPS 129 FPS +171.3% (A)
Vampire Bloodhunt 252 FPS 35 FPS +620% (A)
Watch Dogs Legion 107 FPS 13 FPS +723.1% (A)
X-Plane 11.11 33 FPS 30 FPS +10% (A)
Yakuza Like a Dragon 160 FPS 20 FPS +700% (A)

Specs from public sources (PassMark, Geekbench). FPS measured at 1080p medium settings.

Based on the comparison: GeForce RTX 3080 Ti wins 16 of the comparable criteria. The choice depends on your use case.

🤔 How to choose

Universal advice for any use case.

  • Reliability vs price: reliability (median 50) ↔ price (median 385.1).
  • Weight vs CPU: mobility (median 48) ↔ overall performance (median 49.8).
  • Upgradeability vs battery: upgradability (median 50) ↔ battery life (median 2.8).
All reviews