Component comparison
GeForce RTX 3070 vs Quadro T1000
GeForce RTX 3070 vs Quadro T1000 — detailed GPU comparison: performance, gaming FPS, specifications.
Advantages
A
GeForce RTX 3070
- + Release year (+2)
- + VRAM (GB) (+4 GB)
- + Memory bus (bit) (+128 bit)
- + TGP / TDP (W) (+75 W)
- + Lithography (nm) (-4 nm)
- + CUDA cores (+5120)
- + PassMark (overall) (+7851)
- + Geekbench OpenCL (+89629)
- + Geekbench Vulkan (+91257)
- + Normalized score (+32.6)
B
Quadro T1000
- + Memory clock (MHz) (+6250 MHz)
- + Energy efficiency (+0.9)
Detailed spec comparison
| Spec |
Component A
GeForce RTX 3070
|
Component B
Quadro T1000
|
|---|---|---|
| Release year | 2021 (+2) | 2019 |
| VRAM (GB) | 8 GB (+4 GB) | 4 GB |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Memory clock (MHz) | 1750 MHz | 8000 MHz (+6250 MHz) |
| Bandwidth (GB/s) | 448 GB/s | — |
| Memory bus (bit) | 256 bit (+128 bit) | 128 bit |
| TGP / TDP (W) | 125 W (+75 W) | 50 W |
| Lithography (nm) | 8 nm (-4 nm) | 12 nm |
| Transistors (M) | 17,400M | — |
| Die size (mm²) | 392 mm² | — |
| Base clock (MHz) | — | — |
| Boost clock (MHz) | — | 1455 MHz |
| CUDA cores | 5,888 (+5120) | 768 |
| TMUs | 184 | — |
| ROPs | 96 | — |
| RT cores | 46 | — |
| Tensor cores | 184 | — |
| FP32 performance (TFLOPS) | 20.31 TFLOPS | — |
| Pixel fill rate (GPixel/s) | 165.60 GPixel/s | — |
| Texture fill rate (GTexel/s) | 317.40 GTexel/s | — |
| Energy efficiency | 23.2 | 24.1 (+0.9) |
| PassMark (overall) | 14,364 (+7851) | 6,513 |
| 3DMark Time Spy | 9,619 | — |
| 3DMark Fire Strike | 25,478 | — |
| Geekbench OpenCL | 123,479 (+89629) | 33,850 |
| Geekbench Vulkan | 120,982 (+91257) | 29,725 |
| Normalized score | 78.5 (+32.6) | 45.9 |
Only in component A
DLSS
ReBAR
ray_tracing
In both
CUDA
FPS in games (1080p)
| Game | GeForce RTX 3070 | Quadro T1000 | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|
| Anno 1800 | 35 FPS | 37 FPS | 5.7% (B) |
| Apex Legends | 143 FPS | 58 FPS | +146.6% (A) |
| Battlefield 5 | 120 FPS | 38 FPS | +215.8% (A) |
| Borderlands 3 | 78 FPS | 38 FPS | +105.3% (A) |
| CS:GO | 240 FPS | 240 FPS | ≈ |
| Control | 70 FPS | 31 FPS | +125.8% (A) |
| Doom Eternal | 152 FPS | 64 FPS | +137.5% (A) |
| Dota 2 | 130 FPS | 113 FPS | +15% (A) |
| Escape from Tarkov | 110 FPS | 68 FPS | +61.8% (A) |
| Far Cry 5 | 119 FPS | 57 FPS | +108.8% (A) |
| Far Cry New Dawn | 80 FPS | 46 FPS | +73.9% (A) |
| Final Fantasy XV Benchmark | 28 FPS | 31 FPS | 10.7% (B) |
| GRID 2019 | 83 FPS | 65 FPS | +27.7% (A) |
| GTA V | 140 FPS | 140 FPS | ≈ |
| GTA V | 58 FPS | 94 FPS | 62.1% (B) |
| Gears Tactics | 110 FPS | 58 FPS | +89.7% (A) |
| Hunt Showdown | 98 FPS | 44 FPS | +122.7% (A) |
| Metro Exodus | 97 FPS | 32 FPS | +203.1% (A) |
| Need for Speed Heat | 66 FPS | 52 FPS | +26.9% (A) |
| Overwatch | 240 FPS | 240 FPS | ≈ |
| PUBG | 140 FPS | 140 FPS | ≈ |
| Rage 2 | 102 FPS | 46 FPS | +121.7% (A) |
| Red Dead Redemption 2 | 67 FPS | 30 FPS | +123.3% (A) |
| Rise of the Tomb Raider | 139 FPS | 53 FPS | +162.3% (A) |
| Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 88 FPS | 40 FPS | +120% (A) |
| Star Wars Jedi Fallen Order | 72 FPS | 58 FPS | +24.1% (A) |
| The Division 2 | 85 FPS | 36 FPS | +136.1% (A) |
| The Witcher 3 | 122 FPS | 53 FPS | +130.2% (A) |
| Total War: Three Kingdoms | 101 FPS | 38 FPS | +165.8% (A) |
| X-Plane 11.11 | 12 FPS | 57 FPS | 375% (B) |
Specs from public sources (PassMark, Geekbench). FPS measured at 1080p medium settings.
Based on the comparison:
GeForce RTX 3070 wins 10 of the comparable criteria.
The choice depends on your use case.
🤔 How to choose
Universal advice for any use case.
- Reliability vs price: reliability (median 50) ↔ price (median 385.1).
- Weight vs CPU: mobility (median 48) ↔ overall performance (median 49.8).
- Upgradeability vs battery: upgradability (median 50) ↔ battery life (median 2.8).