Component comparison
GeForce RTX 3070 vs GeForce MX450
GeForce RTX 3070 vs GeForce MX450 — detailed GPU comparison: performance, gaming FPS, specifications.
Advantages
A
GeForce RTX 3070
- + Release year (+1)
- + VRAM (GB) (+6 GB)
- + Memory clock (MHz) (+500 MHz)
- + Bandwidth (GB/s) (+368 GB/s)
- + Memory bus (bit) (+192 bit)
- + TGP / TDP (W) (+100 W)
- + Lithography (nm) (-4 nm)
- + Transistors (M) (+12,700M)
- + CUDA cores (+4992)
- + TMUs (+120)
- + ROPs (+64)
- + FP32 performance (TFLOPS) (+17.08 TFLOPS)
- + Pixel fill rate (GPixel/s) (+115.20 GPixel/s)
- + Texture fill rate (GTexel/s) (+229.20 GTexel/s)
- + PassMark (overall) (+10650)
- + 3DMark Time Spy (+7719)
- + 3DMark Fire Strike (+20753)
- + Geekbench OpenCL (+94938)
- + Geekbench Vulkan (+93661)
- + Normalized score (+33.8)
B
GeForce MX450
- + Die size (mm²) (+192 mm²)
- + Energy efficiency (+4.4)
Detailed spec comparison
| Spec |
Component A
GeForce RTX 3070
|
Component B
GeForce MX450
|
|---|---|---|
| Release year | 2021 (+1) | 2020 |
| VRAM (GB) | 8 GB (+6 GB) | 2 GB |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5, GDDR6 |
| Memory clock (MHz) | 1750 MHz (+500 MHz) | 1250 MHz |
| Bandwidth (GB/s) | 448 GB/s (+368 GB/s) | 80 GB/s |
| Memory bus (bit) | 256 bit (+192 bit) | 64 bit |
| TGP / TDP (W) | 125 W (+100 W) | 25 W |
| Lithography (nm) | 8 nm (-4 nm) | 12 nm |
| Transistors (M) | 17,400M (+12,700M) | 4,700M |
| Die size (mm²) | 392 mm² | 200 mm² (+192 mm²) |
| Base clock (MHz) | — | 1395 MHz |
| Boost clock (MHz) | — | 1575 MHz |
| CUDA cores | 5,888 (+4992) | 896 |
| TMUs | 184 (+120) | 64 |
| ROPs | 96 (+64) | 32 |
| RT cores | 46 | — |
| Tensor cores | 184 | — |
| FP32 performance (TFLOPS) | 20.31 TFLOPS (+17.08 TFLOPS) | 3.23 TFLOPS |
| Pixel fill rate (GPixel/s) | 165.60 GPixel/s (+115.20 GPixel/s) | 50.40 GPixel/s |
| Texture fill rate (GTexel/s) | 317.40 GTexel/s (+229.20 GTexel/s) | 88.20 GTexel/s |
| Energy efficiency | 23.2 | 27.6 (+4.4) |
| PassMark (overall) | 14,364 (+10650) | 3,714 |
| 3DMark Time Spy | 9,619 (+7719) | 1,900 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike | 25,478 (+20753) | 4,725 |
| Geekbench OpenCL | 123,479 (+94938) | 28,541 |
| Geekbench Vulkan | 120,982 (+93661) | 27,321 |
| Normalized score | 78.5 (+33.8) | 44.7 |
Only in component A
DLSS
ReBAR
ray_tracing
In both
CUDA
FPS in games (1080p)
| Game | GeForce RTX 3070 | GeForce MX450 | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|
| Battlefield 5 | 120 FPS | 49 FPS | +144.9% (A) |
| CS:GO | 240 FPS | 240 FPS | ≈ |
| Counter-Strike 2 | 241 FPS | 88 FPS | +173.9% (A) |
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 119 FPS | 32 FPS | +271.9% (A) |
| Dota 2 | 130 FPS | 88 FPS | +47.7% (A) |
| Far Cry 5 | 119 FPS | 34 FPS | +250% (A) |
| Fortnite | 150 FPS | 61 FPS | +145.9% (A) |
| Forza Horizon 4 | 189 FPS | 35 FPS | +440% (A) |
| Forza Horizon 5 | 159 FPS | 34 FPS | +367.6% (A) |
| GTA V | 140 FPS | 140 FPS | ≈ |
| Metro Exodus | 97 FPS | 10 FPS | +870% (A) |
| Overwatch | 240 FPS | 240 FPS | ≈ |
| PUBG | 140 FPS | 140 FPS | ≈ |
| Resident Evil 4 Remake | 140 FPS | 16 FPS | +775% (A) |
| The Witcher 3 | 170 FPS | 33 FPS | +415.2% (A) |
| Valorant | 210 FPS | 85 FPS | +147.1% (A) |
Specs from public sources (PassMark, Geekbench). FPS measured at 1080p medium settings.
Based on the comparison:
GeForce RTX 3070 wins 20 of the comparable criteria.
The choice depends on your use case.
🤔 How to choose
Universal advice for any use case.
- Reliability vs price: reliability (median 50) ↔ price (median 385.1).
- Weight vs CPU: mobility (median 48) ↔ overall performance (median 49.8).
- Upgradeability vs battery: upgradability (median 50) ↔ battery life (median 2.8).