Component comparison

GeForce RTX 3070 vs GeForce MX350

GeForce RTX 3070 vs GeForce MX350 — detailed GPU comparison: performance, gaming FPS, specifications.

Advantages

A GeForce RTX 3070
  • + Release year (+1)
  • + VRAM (GB) (+6 GB)
  • + Bandwidth (GB/s) (+392 GB/s)
  • + Memory bus (bit) (+192 bit)
  • + TGP / TDP (W) (+105 W)
  • + Lithography (nm) (-6 nm)
  • + Transistors (M) (+14,100M)
  • + CUDA cores (+5248)
  • + TMUs (+152)
  • + ROPs (+80)
  • + FP32 performance (TFLOPS) (+19.11 TFLOPS)
  • + Pixel fill rate (GPixel/s) (+142.11 GPixel/s)
  • + Texture fill rate (GTexel/s) (+270.42 GTexel/s)
  • + PassMark (overall) (+11546)
  • + 3DMark Time Spy (+8283)
  • + 3DMark Fire Strike (+21107)
  • + Geekbench OpenCL (+110367)
  • + Geekbench Vulkan (+107613)
  • + Normalized score (+47.7)
B GeForce MX350
  • + Memory clock (MHz) (+2 MHz)
  • + Die size (mm²) (+260 mm²)
  • + Energy efficiency (+2.9)

Detailed spec comparison

Spec Component A
GeForce RTX 3070
Component B
GeForce MX350
Release year 2021 (+1) 2020
VRAM (GB) 8 GB (+6 GB) 2 GB
Memory type GDDR6 GDDR5
Memory clock (MHz) 1750 MHz 1752 MHz (+2 MHz)
Bandwidth (GB/s) 448 GB/s (+392 GB/s) 56 GB/s
Memory bus (bit) 256 bit (+192 bit) 64 bit
TGP / TDP (W) 125 W (+105 W) 20 W
Lithography (nm) 8 nm (-6 nm) 14 nm
Transistors (M) 17,400M (+14,100M) 3,300M
Die size (mm²) 392 mm² 132 mm² (+260 mm²)
Base clock (MHz) 1354 MHz
Boost clock (MHz) 1468 MHz
CUDA cores 5,888 (+5248) 640
TMUs 184 (+152) 32
ROPs 96 (+80) 16
RT cores 46
Tensor cores 184
FP32 performance (TFLOPS) 20.31 TFLOPS (+19.11 TFLOPS) 1.20 TFLOPS
Pixel fill rate (GPixel/s) 165.60 GPixel/s (+142.11 GPixel/s) 23.49 GPixel/s
Texture fill rate (GTexel/s) 317.40 GTexel/s (+270.42 GTexel/s) 46.98 GTexel/s
Energy efficiency 23.2 26.1 (+2.9)
PassMark (overall) 14,364 (+11546) 2,818
3DMark Time Spy 9,619 (+8283) 1,336
3DMark Fire Strike 25,478 (+21107) 4,371
Geekbench OpenCL 123,479 (+110367) 13,112
Geekbench Vulkan 120,982 (+107613) 13,369
Normalized score 78.5 (+47.7) 30.8

Only in component A

DLSS ReBAR ray_tracing

In both

CUDA

FPS in games (1080p)

Game GeForce RTX 3070 GeForce MX350 Delta
A Plague Tale Requiem 56 FPS 8 FPS +600% (A)
Anno 1800 35 FPS 19 FPS +84.2% (A)
Apex Legends 143 FPS 28 FPS +410.7% (A)
Armored Core 6 101 FPS 10 FPS +910% (A)
Assassin´s Creed Valhalla 63 FPS 6 FPS +950% (A)
Atomic Heart 89 FPS 7 FPS +1171.4% (A)
Back 4 Blood 205 FPS 29 FPS +606.9% (A)
Baldur's Gate 3 102 FPS 11 FPS +827.3% (A)
Battlefield 5 120 FPS 37 FPS +224.3% (A)
Borderlands 3 78 FPS 17 FPS +358.8% (A)
CS:GO 240 FPS 240 FPS
Call of Duty Black Ops Cold War 82 FPS 10 FPS +720% (A)
Call of Duty Modern Warfare 2 2022 90 FPS 14 FPS +542.9% (A)
Control 70 FPS 12 FPS +483.3% (A)
Counter-Strike 2 241 FPS 66 FPS +265.2% (A)
Counter-Strike 2 194 FPS 31 FPS +525.8% (A)
Crysis Remastered 63 FPS 9 FPS +600% (A)
Cyberpunk 2077 119 FPS 16 FPS +643.8% (A)
Cyberpunk 2077 1.0 58 FPS 7 FPS +728.6% (A)
Cyberpunk 2077 1.6 67 FPS 6 FPS +1016.7% (A)
Days Gone 112 FPS 24 FPS +366.7% (A)
Dead Island 2 164 FPS 21 FPS +681% (A)
Death Stranding 74 FPS 17 FPS +335.3% (A)
Deathloop 106 FPS 7 FPS +1414.3% (A)
Diablo 4 159 FPS 27 FPS +488.9% (A)
Dirt 5 77 FPS 7 FPS +1000% (A)
Dota 2 130 FPS 83 FPS +56.6% (A)
Elden Ring 59 FPS 15 FPS +293.3% (A)
Escape from Tarkov 110 FPS 32 FPS +243.8% (A)
F1 2020 118 FPS 33 FPS +257.6% (A)
F1 2021 66 FPS 31 FPS +112.9% (A)
F1 22 171 FPS 20 FPS +755% (A)
FIFA 21 148 FPS 88 FPS +68.2% (A)
Far Cry 5 119 FPS 27 FPS +340.7% (A)
Far Cry 6 91 FPS 11 FPS +727.3% (A)
Far Cry New Dawn 80 FPS 25 FPS +220% (A)
Farming Simulator 22 139 FPS 32 FPS +334.4% (A)
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark 28 FPS 11 FPS +154.5% (A)
Flight Simulator 2020 42 FPS 9 FPS +366.7% (A)
Fortnite 150 FPS 82 FPS +82.9% (A)
Forza Horizon 4 189 FPS 37 FPS +410.8% (A)
Forza Horizon 5 159 FPS 25 FPS +536% (A)
GRID 2019 83 FPS 18 FPS +361.1% (A)
GRID Legends 153 FPS 25 FPS +512% (A)
GTA V 140 FPS 140 FPS
GTA V 58 FPS 46 FPS +26.1% (A)
Gears Tactics 110 FPS 30 FPS +266.7% (A)
Ghostwire Tokyo 160 FPS 15 FPS +966.7% (A)
Hitman 3 121 FPS 19 FPS +536.8% (A)
Horizon Zero Dawn 83 FPS 12 FPS +591.7% (A)
Hunt Showdown 98 FPS 21 FPS +366.7% (A)
Immortals Fenyx Rising 73 FPS 10 FPS +630% (A)
Lies of P 130 FPS 19 FPS +584.2% (A)
Mafia Definitive Edition 78 FPS 19 FPS +310.5% (A)
Metro Exodus 97 FPS 12 FPS +708.3% (A)
Monster Hunter Stories 2 143 FPS 57 FPS +150.9% (A)
Need for Speed Heat 66 FPS 23 FPS +187% (A)
Outriders 94 FPS 22 FPS +327.3% (A)
Overwatch 240 FPS 240 FPS
PUBG 140 FPS 140 FPS
Rage 2 102 FPS 15 FPS +580% (A)
Rainbow Six Extraction 171 FPS 18 FPS +850% (A)
Ready or Not 175 FPS 32 FPS +446.9% (A)
Resident Evil 4 Remake 140 FPS 18 FPS +677.8% (A)
Resident Evil Village 136 FPS 14 FPS +871.4% (A)
Riders Republic 106 FPS 15 FPS +606.7% (A)
Serious Sam 4 74 FPS 4 FPS +1750% (A)
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 88 FPS 25 FPS +252% (A)
Sons of the Forest 73 FPS 13 FPS +461.5% (A)
Star Wars Jedi Fallen Order 72 FPS 19 FPS +278.9% (A)
Star Wars Squadrons 180 FPS 50 FPS +260% (A)
The Callisto Protocol 79 FPS 10 FPS +690% (A)
The Division 2 85 FPS 20 FPS +325% (A)
The Finals 161 FPS 17 FPS +847.1% (A)
The Quarry 96 FPS 11 FPS +772.7% (A)
The Witcher 3 170 FPS 27 FPS +529.6% (A)
The Witcher 3 122 FPS 21 FPS +481% (A)
The Witcher 3 v4 128 FPS 7 FPS +1728.6% (A)
Tiny Tina's Wonderlands 103 FPS 8 FPS +1187.5% (A)
Total War Pharaoh 127 FPS 23 FPS +452.2% (A)
Total War: Three Kingdoms 101 FPS 12 FPS +741.7% (A)
Valorant 210 FPS 129 FPS +62.8% (A)
Vampire Bloodhunt 226 FPS 35 FPS +545.7% (A)
Watch Dogs Legion 62 FPS 13 FPS +376.9% (A)
X-Plane 11.11 12 FPS 30 FPS 150% (B)
Yakuza Like a Dragon 90 FPS 20 FPS +350% (A)

Specs from public sources (PassMark, Geekbench). FPS measured at 1080p medium settings.

Based on the comparison: GeForce RTX 3070 wins 19 of the comparable criteria. The choice depends on your use case.

🤔 How to choose

Universal advice for any use case.

  • Reliability vs price: reliability (median 50) ↔ price (median 385.1).
  • Weight vs CPU: mobility (median 48) ↔ overall performance (median 49.8).
  • Upgradeability vs battery: upgradability (median 50) ↔ battery life (median 2.8).