Component comparison

GeForce RTX 3070 vs GeForce GTX 1050 Ti

GeForce RTX 3070 vs GeForce GTX 1050 Ti — detailed GPU comparison: performance, gaming FPS, specifications.

Advantages

A GeForce RTX 3070
  • + Release year (+5)
  • + VRAM (GB) (+4 GB)
  • + Bandwidth (GB/s) (+336 GB/s)
  • + Memory bus (bit) (+128 bit)
  • + TGP / TDP (W) (+50 W)
  • + Lithography (nm) (-6 nm)
  • + Transistors (M) (+14,100M)
  • + CUDA cores (+5120)
  • + TMUs (+136)
  • + ROPs (+64)
  • + FP32 performance (TFLOPS) (+18.13 TFLOPS)
  • + Pixel fill rate (GPixel/s) (+121.06 GPixel/s)
  • + Texture fill rate (GTexel/s) (+250.58 GTexel/s)
  • + Energy efficiency (+7.4)
  • + PassMark (overall) (+8001)
  • + 3DMark Time Spy (+7358)
  • + 3DMark Fire Strike (+17993)
  • + Geekbench OpenCL (+102825)
  • + Geekbench Vulkan (+101192)
  • + Normalized score (+37.7)
B GeForce GTX 1050 Ti
  • + Die size (mm²) (+260 mm²)

Detailed spec comparison

Spec Component A
GeForce RTX 3070
 Component B
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti
Release year 2021 (+5) 2016
VRAM (GB) 8 GB (+4 GB) 4 GB
Memory type GDDR6 GDDR5
Memory clock (MHz) 1750 MHz —
Bandwidth (GB/s) 448 GB/s (+336 GB/s) 112 GB/s
Memory bus (bit) 256 bit (+128 bit) 128 bit
TGP / TDP (W) 125 W (+50 W) 75 W
Lithography (nm) 8 nm (-6 nm) 14 nm
Transistors (M) 17,400M (+14,100M) 3,300M
Die size (mm²) 392 mm² 132 mm² (+260 mm²)
Base clock (MHz) — —
Boost clock (MHz) — —
CUDA cores 5,888 (+5120) 768
TMUs 184 (+136) 48
ROPs 96 (+64) 32
RT cores 46 —
Tensor cores 184 —
FP32 performance (TFLOPS) 20.31 TFLOPS (+18.13 TFLOPS) 2.18 TFLOPS
Pixel fill rate (GPixel/s) 165.60 GPixel/s (+121.06 GPixel/s) 44.54 GPixel/s
Texture fill rate (GTexel/s) 317.40 GTexel/s (+250.58 GTexel/s) 66.82 GTexel/s
Energy efficiency 23.2 (+7.4) 15.8
PassMark (overall) 14,364 (+8001) 6,363
3DMark Time Spy 9,619 (+7358) 2,261
3DMark Fire Strike 25,478 (+17993) 7,485
Geekbench OpenCL 123,479 (+102825) 20,654
Geekbench Vulkan 120,982 (+101192) 19,790
Normalized score 78.5 (+37.7) 40.8

Only in component A

DLSS ReBAR ray_tracing

In both

CUDA

FPS in games (1080p)

Game GeForce RTX 3070 GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Delta
Alan Wake Remastered 79 FPS 29 FPS +172.4% (A)
Anno 1800 35 FPS 39 FPS 11.4% (B)
Apex Legends 143 FPS 43 FPS +232.6% (A)
Assassin´s Creed Valhalla 63 FPS 15 FPS +320% (A)
Battlefield 2042 96 FPS 13 FPS +638.5% (A)
Battlefield 5 120 FPS 57 FPS +110.5% (A)
Borderlands 3 78 FPS 28 FPS +178.6% (A)
CS:GO 240 FPS 240 FPS ≈
Call of Duty Black Ops Cold War 82 FPS 22 FPS +272.7% (A)
Call of Duty Vanguard 118 FPS 24 FPS +391.7% (A)
Control 70 FPS 22 FPS +218.2% (A)
Counter-Strike 2 241 FPS 70 FPS +244.3% (A)
Cyberpunk 2077 119 FPS 27 FPS +340.7% (A)
Cyberpunk 2077 1.6 67 FPS 17 FPS +294.1% (A)
Death Stranding 74 FPS 36 FPS +105.6% (A)
Deathloop 106 FPS 21 FPS +404.8% (A)
Dirt 5 77 FPS 19 FPS +305.3% (A)
Dota 2 130 FPS 98 FPS +32.7% (A)
Dying Light 2 75 FPS 17 FPS +341.2% (A)
Elden Ring 59 FPS 26 FPS +126.9% (A)
Elex 2 87 FPS 21 FPS +314.3% (A)
Escape from Tarkov 110 FPS 45 FPS +144.4% (A)
F1 2020 118 FPS 63 FPS +87.3% (A)
F1 22 171 FPS 48 FPS +256.3% (A)
FIFA 21 148 FPS 142 FPS +4.2% (A)
Far Cry 5 119 FPS 48 FPS +147.9% (A)
Far Cry 6 91 FPS 29 FPS +213.8% (A)
Far Cry New Dawn 80 FPS 42 FPS +90.5% (A)
Farming Simulator 22 139 FPS 46 FPS +202.2% (A)
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark 28 FPS 23 FPS +21.7% (A)
Flight Simulator 2020 42 FPS 17 FPS +147.1% (A)
Fortnite 150 FPS 75 FPS +100% (A)
Forza Horizon 4 189 FPS 67 FPS +182.1% (A)
Forza Horizon 5 159 FPS 40 FPS +297.5% (A)
GRID 2019 83 FPS 34 FPS +144.1% (A)
GRID Legends 153 FPS 42 FPS +264.3% (A)
GTA V 140 FPS 140 FPS ≈
GTA V 58 FPS 60 FPS 3.4% (B)
Gears Tactics 110 FPS 49 FPS +124.5% (A)
Ghostwire Tokyo 160 FPS 33 FPS +384.8% (A)
God of War 88 FPS 12 FPS +633.3% (A)
Hitman 3 121 FPS 40 FPS +202.5% (A)
Horizon Zero Dawn 83 FPS 31 FPS +167.7% (A)
Hunt Showdown 98 FPS 34 FPS +188.2% (A)
Immortals Fenyx Rising 73 FPS 23 FPS +217.4% (A)
Mafia Definitive Edition 78 FPS 33 FPS +136.4% (A)
Metro Exodus 97 FPS 31 FPS +212.9% (A)
Need for Speed Heat 66 FPS 42 FPS +57.1% (A)
Overwatch 240 FPS 240 FPS ≈
PUBG 140 FPS 140 FPS ≈
Rage 2 102 FPS 32 FPS +218.8% (A)
Rainbow Six Extraction 171 FPS 42 FPS +307.1% (A)
Resident Evil 4 Remake 140 FPS 24 FPS +483.3% (A)
Riders Republic 106 FPS 29 FPS +265.5% (A)
Rise of the Tomb Raider 139 FPS 33 FPS +321.2% (A)
Serious Sam 4 74 FPS 22 FPS +236.4% (A)
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 88 FPS 31 FPS +183.9% (A)
Star Wars Jedi Fallen Order 72 FPS 47 FPS +53.2% (A)
Star Wars Squadrons 180 FPS 85 FPS +111.8% (A)
The Division 2 85 FPS 35 FPS +142.9% (A)
The Quarry 96 FPS 24 FPS +300% (A)
The Witcher 3 170 FPS 46 FPS +269.6% (A)
The Witcher 3 122 FPS 21 FPS +481% (A)
Tiny Tina's Wonderlands 103 FPS 24 FPS +329.2% (A)
Valorant 210 FPS 110 FPS +90.9% (A)
Vampire Bloodhunt 226 FPS 58 FPS +289.7% (A)
Watch Dogs Legion 62 FPS 27 FPS +129.6% (A)
X-Plane 11.11 12 FPS 44 FPS 266.7% (B)
Yakuza Like a Dragon 90 FPS 33 FPS +172.7% (A)

Specs from public sources (PassMark, Geekbench). FPS measured at 1080p medium settings.

Based on the comparison: GeForce RTX 3070 wins 20 of the comparable criteria. The choice depends on your use case.

🤔 How to choose

Universal advice for any use case.

  • Reliability vs price: reliability (median 50) ↔ price (median 385.1).
  • Weight vs CPU: mobility (median 48) ↔ overall performance (median 49.8).
  • Upgradeability vs battery: upgradability (median 50) ↔ battery life (median 2.8).
All reviews