Component comparison

GeForce RTX 3070 Ti vs GeForce RTX 3080 Ti

GeForce RTX 3070 Ti vs GeForce RTX 3080 Ti — detailed GPU comparison: performance, gaming FPS, specifications.

Advantages

A GeForce RTX 3070 Ti
  • + Release year (+1)
  • + Die size (mm²) (+236 mm²)
  • + Energy efficiency (+13.8)
B GeForce RTX 3080 Ti
  • + VRAM (GB) (+4 GB)
  • + Bandwidth (GB/s) (+304 GB/s)
  • + Memory bus (bit) (+128 bit)
  • + Transistors (M) (+10,900M)
  • + CUDA cores (+4096)
  • + TMUs (+128)
  • + ROPs (+16)
  • + RT cores (+32)
  • + Tensor cores (+128)
  • + FP32 performance (TFLOPS) (+12.35 TFLOPS)
  • + Pixel fill rate (GPixel/s) (+16.60 GPixel/s)
  • + Texture fill rate (GTexel/s) (+193.00 GTexel/s)
  • + PassMark (overall) (+9457)
  • + 3DMark Fire Strike (+19337)
  • + Normalized score (+2.7)

Detailed spec comparison

Spec Component A
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti
 Component B
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti
Release year 2022 (+1) 2021
VRAM (GB) 8 GB 12 GB (+4 GB)
Memory type GDDR6 GDDR6X
Memory clock (MHz) 1750 MHz —
Bandwidth (GB/s) 608 GB/s 912 GB/s (+304 GB/s)
Memory bus (bit) 256 bit 384 bit (+128 bit)
TGP / TDP (W) 115 W —
Lithography (nm) 8 nm 8 nm
Transistors (M) 17,400M 28,300M (+10,900M)
Die size (mm²) 392 mm² (+236 mm²) 628 mm²
Base clock (MHz) — —
Boost clock (MHz) — —
CUDA cores 6,144 10,240 (+4096)
TMUs 192 320 (+128)
ROPs 96 112 (+16)
RT cores 48 80 (+32)
Tensor cores 192 320 (+128)
FP32 performance (TFLOPS) 21.75 TFLOPS 34.10 TFLOPS (+12.35 TFLOPS)
Pixel fill rate (GPixel/s) 169.90 GPixel/s 186.50 GPixel/s (+16.60 GPixel/s)
Texture fill rate (GTexel/s) 339.80 GTexel/s 532.80 GTexel/s (+193.00 GTexel/s)
Energy efficiency 27.9 (+13.8) 14.2
PassMark (overall) 17,303 26,760 (+9457)
3DMark Time Spy 10,462 —
3DMark Fire Strike 27,776 47,113 (+19337)
Geekbench OpenCL — 209,081
Geekbench Vulkan — —
Normalized score 63.6 66.3 (+2.7)

In both

CUDA DLSS ReBAR ray_tracing

FPS in games (1080p)

Game GeForce RTX 3070 Ti GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Delta
A Plague Tale Requiem 71 FPS 64 FPS +10.9% (A)
Alan Wake Remastered 131 FPS 119 FPS +10.1% (A)
Armored Core 6 90 FPS 115 FPS 27.8% (B)
Assassin's Creed Mirage 102 FPS 109 FPS 6.9% (B)
Assassin´s Creed Valhalla 85 FPS 99 FPS 16.5% (B)
Atlas Fallen 119 FPS 162 FPS 36.1% (B)
Atomic Heart 95 FPS 100 FPS 5.3% (B)
Back 4 Blood 189 FPS 263 FPS 39.2% (B)
Baldur's Gate 3 95 FPS 111 FPS 16.8% (B)
Battlefield 2042 97 FPS 121 FPS 24.7% (B)
Battlefield 5 130 FPS 170 FPS 30.8% (B)
Borderlands 3 92 FPS 100 FPS 8.7% (B)
CS:GO 240 FPS 240 FPS ≈
Call of Duty Modern Warfare 2 2022 87 FPS 109 FPS 25.3% (B)
Company of Heroes 3 148 FPS 175 FPS 18.2% (B)
Counter-Strike 2 220 FPS 300 FPS 36.4% (B)
Crysis Remastered 72 FPS 103 FPS 43.1% (B)
Cyberpunk 2077 129 FPS 219 FPS 69.8% (B)
Cyberpunk 2077 1.0 67 FPS 101 FPS 50.7% (B)
Cyberpunk 2077 1.6 65 FPS 64 FPS +1.6% (A)
Days Gone 115 FPS 177 FPS 53.9% (B)
Dead Space Remake 68 FPS 95 FPS 39.7% (B)
Death Stranding 132 FPS 151 FPS 14.4% (B)
Deathloop 98 FPS 133 FPS 35.7% (B)
Diablo 4 223 FPS 238 FPS 6.7% (B)
Dirt 5 98 FPS 137 FPS 39.8% (B)
Doom Eternal 196 FPS 292 FPS 49% (B)
Dota 2 146 FPS 234 FPS 60.3% (B)
Dying Light 2 66 FPS 69 FPS 4.5% (B)
EA Sports FC 24 134 FPS 194 FPS 44.8% (B)
Elex 2 83 FPS 43 FPS +93% (A)
F1 2021 139 FPS 182 FPS 30.9% (B)
F1 22 157 FPS 172 FPS 9.6% (B)
F1 23 178 FPS 193 FPS 8.4% (B)
Far Cry 5 138 FPS 208 FPS 50.7% (B)
Far Cry 6 89 FPS 91 FPS 2.2% (B)
Farming Simulator 22 149 FPS 183 FPS 22.8% (B)
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark 50 FPS 31 FPS +61.3% (A)
Flight Simulator 2020 70 FPS 79 FPS 12.9% (B)
Fortnite 180 FPS 300 FPS 66.7% (B)
Forza Horizon 4 160 FPS 250 FPS 56.3% (B)
Forza Horizon 5 210 FPS 200 FPS +5% (A)
GRID Legends 148 FPS 117 FPS +26.5% (A)
GTA V 140 FPS 140 FPS ≈
GTA V 80 FPS 153 FPS 91.3% (B)
Gears Tactics 135 FPS 196 FPS 45.2% (B)
Ghostwire Tokyo 124 FPS 126 FPS 1.6% (B)
God of War 77 FPS 110 FPS 42.9% (B)
Guardians of the Galaxy 111 FPS 112 FPS 0.9% (B)
Halo Infinite 101 FPS 147 FPS 45.5% (B)
High On Life 118 FPS 154 FPS 30.5% (B)
Hitman 3 146 FPS 197 FPS 34.9% (B)
Hogwarts Legacy 70 FPS 89 FPS 27.1% (B)
Hunt Showdown 116 FPS 168 FPS 44.8% (B)
Immortals of Aveum 53 FPS 63 FPS 18.9% (B)
Lies of P 134 FPS 158 FPS 17.9% (B)
Lords of the Fallen 56 FPS 64 FPS 14.3% (B)
Mafia Definitive Edition 95 FPS 151 FPS 58.9% (B)
Metro Exodus 95 FPS 172 FPS 81.1% (B)
Need for Speed Unbound 93 FPS 107 FPS 15.1% (B)
New World 93 FPS 97 FPS 4.3% (B)
Outriders 124 FPS 155 FPS 25% (B)
Overwatch 240 FPS 240 FPS ≈
PUBG 140 FPS 140 FPS ≈
Rainbow Six Extraction 176 FPS 157 FPS +12.1% (A)
Ratchet & Clank Rift Apart 60 FPS 94 FPS 56.7% (B)
Resident Evil 4 Remake 110 FPS 190 FPS 72.7% (B)
Resident Evil Village 160 FPS 232 FPS 45% (B)
Returnal 103 FPS 114 FPS 10.7% (B)
Riders Republic 104 FPS 101 FPS +3% (A)
Serious Sam 4 99 FPS 109 FPS 10.1% (B)
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 124 FPS 156 FPS 25.8% (B)
Sons of the Forest 83 FPS 86 FPS 3.6% (B)
Spider-Man Miles Morales 93 FPS 117 FPS 25.8% (B)
Star Wars Jedi Survivor 74 FPS 79 FPS 6.8% (B)
Star Wars Squadrons 269 FPS 378 FPS 40.5% (B)
Starfield 50 FPS 58 FPS 16% (B)
The Callisto Protocol 71 FPS 95 FPS 33.8% (B)
The Crew Motorfest 60 FPS 60 FPS ≈
The Quarry 98 FPS 126 FPS 28.6% (B)
The Witcher 3 188 FPS 372 FPS 97.9% (B)
The Witcher 3 140 FPS 144 FPS 2.9% (B)
The Witcher 3 v4 81 FPS 168 FPS 107.4% (B)
Tiny Tina's Wonderlands 115 FPS 124 FPS 7.8% (B)
Uncharted Legacy of Thieves Collection 72 FPS 86 FPS 19.4% (B)
Valorant 230 FPS 350 FPS 52.2% (B)
Vampire Bloodhunt 173 FPS 252 FPS 45.7% (B)
Watch Dogs Legion 96 FPS 107 FPS 11.5% (B)
X-Plane 11.11 52 FPS 33 FPS +57.6% (A)
Yakuza Like a Dragon 113 FPS 160 FPS 41.6% (B)

Specs from public sources (PassMark, Geekbench). FPS measured at 1080p medium settings.

Based on the comparison: GeForce RTX 3080 Ti wins 15 of the comparable criteria. The choice depends on your use case.

🤔 How to choose

Universal advice for any use case.

  • Reliability vs price: reliability (median 50) ↔ price (median 385.1).
  • Weight vs CPU: mobility (median 48) ↔ overall performance (median 49.8).
  • Upgradeability vs battery: upgradability (median 50) ↔ battery life (median 2.8).
All reviews