Component comparison

GeForce RTX 3070 Ti vs GeForce RTX 3080

GeForce RTX 3070 Ti vs GeForce RTX 3080 — detailed GPU comparison: performance, gaming FPS, specifications.

Advantages

A GeForce RTX 3070 Ti
  • + Release year (+1)
  • + Die size (mm²) (+236 mm²)
  • + Pixel fill rate (GPixel/s) (+5.70 GPixel/s)
  • + Energy efficiency (+2.0)
  • + PassMark (overall) (+1228)
  • + 3DMark Fire Strike (+582)
B GeForce RTX 3080
  • + Bandwidth (GB/s) (+152 GB/s)
  • + Memory bus (bit) (+64 bit)
  • + Transistors (M) (+10,900M)
  • + CUDA cores (+2560)
  • + TMUs (+80)
  • + RT cores (+20)
  • + Tensor cores (+80)
  • + FP32 performance (TFLOPS) (+8.02 TFLOPS)
  • + Texture fill rate (GTexel/s) (+125.30 GTexel/s)
  • + 3DMark Time Spy (+290)
  • + Normalized score (+19.2)

Detailed spec comparison

Spec Component A
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti
 Component B
GeForce RTX 3080
Release year 2022 (+1) 2021
VRAM (GB) 8 GB 8 GB
Memory type GDDR6 GDDR6
Memory clock (MHz) 1750 MHz 1750 MHz
Bandwidth (GB/s) 608 GB/s 760 GB/s (+152 GB/s)
Memory bus (bit) 256 bit 320 bit (+64 bit)
TGP / TDP (W) 115 W 115 W
Lithography (nm) 8 nm 8 nm
Transistors (M) 17,400M 28,300M (+10,900M)
Die size (mm²) 392 mm² (+236 mm²) 628 mm²
Base clock (MHz) — —
Boost clock (MHz) — —
CUDA cores 6,144 8,704 (+2560)
TMUs 192 272 (+80)
ROPs 96 96
RT cores 48 68 (+20)
Tensor cores 192 272 (+80)
FP32 performance (TFLOPS) 21.75 TFLOPS 29.77 TFLOPS (+8.02 TFLOPS)
Pixel fill rate (GPixel/s) 169.90 GPixel/s (+5.70 GPixel/s) 164.20 GPixel/s
Texture fill rate (GTexel/s) 339.80 GTexel/s 465.10 GTexel/s (+125.30 GTexel/s)
Energy efficiency 27.9 (+2.0) 26.0
PassMark (overall) 17,303 (+1228) 16,075
3DMark Time Spy 10,462 10,752 (+290)
3DMark Fire Strike 27,776 (+582) 27,194
Geekbench OpenCL — 167,014
Geekbench Vulkan — 145,176
Normalized score 63.6 82.8 (+19.2)

In both

CUDA DLSS ReBAR ray_tracing

FPS in games (1080p)

Game GeForce RTX 3070 Ti GeForce RTX 3080 Delta
A Plague Tale Requiem 71 FPS 59 FPS +20.3% (A)
Alan Wake Remastered 131 FPS 95 FPS +37.9% (A)
Assassin's Creed Mirage 102 FPS 89 FPS +14.6% (A)
Assassin´s Creed Valhalla 85 FPS 72 FPS +18.1% (A)
Atlas Fallen 119 FPS 117 FPS +1.7% (A)
Atomic Heart 95 FPS 85 FPS +11.8% (A)
Back 4 Blood 189 FPS 235 FPS 24.3% (B)
Baldur's Gate 3 95 FPS 90 FPS +5.6% (A)
Battlefield 2042 97 FPS 100 FPS 3.1% (B)
Battlefield 5 130 FPS 130 FPS ≈
Borderlands 3 92 FPS 95 FPS 3.3% (B)
CS:GO 240 FPS 240 FPS ≈
Call of Duty Modern Warfare 2 2022 87 FPS 106 FPS 21.8% (B)
Company of Heroes 3 148 FPS 114 FPS +29.8% (A)
Counter-Strike 2 220 FPS 212 FPS +3.8% (A)
Crysis Remastered 72 FPS 79 FPS 9.7% (B)
Cyberpunk 2077 129 FPS 121 FPS +6.6% (A)
Cyberpunk 2077 1.0 67 FPS 68 FPS 1.5% (B)
Cyberpunk 2077 1.6 65 FPS 83 FPS 27.7% (B)
Days Gone 115 FPS 126 FPS 9.6% (B)
Dead Island 2 173 FPS 158 FPS +9.5% (A)
Dead Space Remake 68 FPS 73 FPS 7.4% (B)
Death Stranding 132 FPS 84 FPS +57.1% (A)
Deathloop 98 FPS 113 FPS 15.3% (B)
Diablo 4 223 FPS 181 FPS +23.2% (A)
Dirt 5 98 FPS 62 FPS +58.1% (A)
Doom Eternal 196 FPS 165 FPS +18.8% (A)
Dota 2 146 FPS 134 FPS +9% (A)
Dying Light 2 66 FPS 87 FPS 31.8% (B)
EA Sports FC 24 134 FPS 149 FPS 11.2% (B)
Elden Ring 60 FPS 59 FPS +1.7% (A)
Elex 2 83 FPS 88 FPS 6% (B)
Escape from Tarkov 120 FPS 120 FPS ≈
F1 2021 139 FPS 156 FPS 12.2% (B)
F1 22 157 FPS 195 FPS 24.2% (B)
F1 23 178 FPS 184 FPS 3.4% (B)
Far Cry 5 138 FPS 129 FPS +7% (A)
Far Cry 6 89 FPS 65 FPS +36.9% (A)
Farming Simulator 22 149 FPS 165 FPS 10.7% (B)
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark 50 FPS 56 FPS 12% (B)
Fortnite 180 FPS 160 FPS +12.5% (A)
Forza Horizon 4 160 FPS 194 FPS 21.3% (B)
Forza Horizon 5 210 FPS 152 FPS +38.2% (A)
GRID Legends 148 FPS 131 FPS +13% (A)
GTA V 140 FPS 140 FPS ≈
GTA V 80 FPS 137 FPS 71.3% (B)
Gears Tactics 135 FPS 136 FPS 0.7% (B)
Ghostwire Tokyo 124 FPS 149 FPS 20.2% (B)
God of War 77 FPS 91 FPS 18.2% (B)
Guardians of the Galaxy 111 FPS 124 FPS 11.7% (B)
Halo Infinite 101 FPS 101 FPS ≈
High On Life 118 FPS 133 FPS 12.7% (B)
Hitman 3 146 FPS 131 FPS +11.5% (A)
Hogwarts Legacy 70 FPS 77 FPS 10% (B)
Hunt Showdown 116 FPS 110 FPS +5.5% (A)
Immortals of Aveum 53 FPS 53 FPS ≈
Lies of P 134 FPS 131 FPS +2.3% (A)
Lords of the Fallen 56 FPS 66 FPS 17.9% (B)
Mafia Definitive Edition 95 FPS 99 FPS 4.2% (B)
Metro Exodus 95 FPS 100 FPS 5.3% (B)
Need for Speed Unbound 93 FPS 100 FPS 7.5% (B)
New World 93 FPS 75 FPS +24% (A)
Outriders 124 FPS 109 FPS +13.8% (A)
Overwatch 240 FPS 240 FPS ≈
PUBG 140 FPS 140 FPS ≈
Rainbow Six Extraction 176 FPS 218 FPS 23.9% (B)
Ratchet & Clank Rift Apart 60 FPS 82 FPS 36.7% (B)
Resident Evil 4 Remake 110 FPS 140 FPS 27.3% (B)
Resident Evil Village 160 FPS 155 FPS +3.2% (A)
Returnal 103 FPS 88 FPS +17% (A)
Riders Republic 104 FPS 113 FPS 8.7% (B)
Serious Sam 4 99 FPS 75 FPS +32% (A)
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 124 FPS 165 FPS 33.1% (B)
Sons of the Forest 83 FPS 77 FPS +7.8% (A)
Spider-Man Miles Morales 93 FPS 104 FPS 11.8% (B)
Star Wars Jedi Survivor 74 FPS 68 FPS +8.8% (A)
Star Wars Squadrons 269 FPS 198 FPS +35.9% (A)
Starfield 50 FPS 52 FPS 4% (B)
The Callisto Protocol 71 FPS 87 FPS 22.5% (B)
The Quarry 98 FPS 97 FPS +1% (A)
The Witcher 3 188 FPS 191 FPS 1.6% (B)
The Witcher 3 140 FPS 149 FPS 6.4% (B)
The Witcher 3 v4 81 FPS 132 FPS 63% (B)
Tiny Tina's Wonderlands 115 FPS 113 FPS +1.8% (A)
Uncharted Legacy of Thieves Collection 72 FPS 76 FPS 5.6% (B)
Valorant 230 FPS 220 FPS +4.5% (A)
Vampire Bloodhunt 173 FPS 238 FPS 37.6% (B)
Watch Dogs Legion 96 FPS 80 FPS +20% (A)
X-Plane 11.11 52 FPS 66 FPS 26.9% (B)
Yakuza Like a Dragon 113 FPS 112 FPS +0.9% (A)

Specs from public sources (PassMark, Geekbench). FPS measured at 1080p medium settings.

Based on the comparison: GeForce RTX 3080 wins 11 of the comparable criteria. The choice depends on your use case.

🤔 How to choose

Universal advice for any use case.

  • Reliability vs price: reliability (median 50) ↔ price (median 385.1).
  • Weight vs CPU: mobility (median 48) ↔ overall performance (median 49.8).
  • Upgradeability vs battery: upgradability (median 50) ↔ battery life (median 2.8).
All reviews