Component comparison

GeForce RTX 3070 Ti vs GeForce RTX 2070

GeForce RTX 3070 Ti vs GeForce RTX 2070 — detailed GPU comparison: performance, gaming FPS, specifications.

Advantages

A GeForce RTX 3070 Ti
  • + Release year (+4)
  • + Bandwidth (GB/s) (+160 GB/s)
  • + TGP / TDP (W) (+35 W)
  • + Lithography (nm) (-4 nm)
  • + Transistors (M) (+6,600M)
  • + Die size (mm²) (+53 mm²)
  • + CUDA cores (+3840)
  • + TMUs (+48)
  • + ROPs (+32)
  • + RT cores (+12)
  • + FP32 performance (TFLOPS) (+16.29 TFLOPS)
  • + Pixel fill rate (GPixel/s) (+66.20 GPixel/s)
  • + Texture fill rate (GTexel/s) (+106.50 GTexel/s)
  • + Energy efficiency (+10.9)
  • + PassMark (overall) (+1240)
  • + 3DMark Time Spy (+3801)
  • + 3DMark Fire Strike (+4590)
B GeForce RTX 2070
  • + Tensor cores (+96)
  • + Normalized score (+6.9)

Detailed spec comparison

Spec Component A
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti
Component B
GeForce RTX 2070
Release year 2022 (+4) 2018
VRAM (GB) 8 GB 8 GB
Memory type GDDR6 GDDR6
Memory clock (MHz) 1750 MHz
Bandwidth (GB/s) 608 GB/s (+160 GB/s) 448 GB/s
Memory bus (bit) 256 bit 256 bit
TGP / TDP (W) 115 W (+35 W) 80 W
Lithography (nm) 8 nm (-4 nm) 12 nm
Transistors (M) 17,400M (+6,600M) 10,800M
Die size (mm²) 392 mm² (+53 mm²) 445 mm²
Base clock (MHz)
Boost clock (MHz)
CUDA cores 6,144 (+3840) 2,304
TMUs 192 (+48) 144
ROPs 96 (+32) 64
RT cores 48 (+12) 36
Tensor cores 192 288 (+96)
FP32 performance (TFLOPS) 21.75 TFLOPS (+16.29 TFLOPS) 5.46 TFLOPS
Pixel fill rate (GPixel/s) 169.90 GPixel/s (+66.20 GPixel/s) 103.70 GPixel/s
Texture fill rate (GTexel/s) 339.80 GTexel/s (+106.50 GTexel/s) 233.30 GTexel/s
Energy efficiency 27.9 (+10.9) 17.0
PassMark (overall) 17,303 (+1240) 16,063
3DMark Time Spy 10,462 (+3801) 6,661
3DMark Fire Strike 27,776 (+4590) 23,186
Geekbench OpenCL 88,437
Geekbench Vulkan 83,408
Normalized score 63.6 70.5 (+6.9)

Only in component A

ReBAR ray_tracing

In both

CUDA DLSS

FPS in games (1080p)

Game GeForce RTX 3070 Ti GeForce RTX 2070 Delta
Assassin´s Creed Valhalla 85 FPS 69 FPS +23.2% (A)
Battlefield 5 130 FPS 92 FPS +41.3% (A)
Borderlands 3 92 FPS 71 FPS +29.6% (A)
CS:GO 240 FPS 240 FPS
Counter-Strike 2 220 FPS 150 FPS +46.7% (A)
Crysis Remastered 72 FPS 71 FPS +1.4% (A)
Cyberpunk 2077 129 FPS 60 FPS +115% (A)
Cyberpunk 2077 1.0 67 FPS 62 FPS +8.1% (A)
Days Gone 115 FPS 101 FPS +13.9% (A)
Death Stranding 132 FPS 115 FPS +14.8% (A)
Dirt 5 98 FPS 69 FPS +42% (A)
Doom Eternal 196 FPS 149 FPS +31.5% (A)
Dota 2 146 FPS 127 FPS +15% (A)
Escape from Tarkov 120 FPS 119 FPS +0.8% (A)
F1 2021 139 FPS 139 FPS
Far Cry 5 138 FPS 103 FPS +34% (A)
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark 50 FPS 77 FPS 54% (B)
Flight Simulator 2020 70 FPS 49 FPS +42.9% (A)
Fortnite 180 FPS 122 FPS +47.5% (A)
Forza Horizon 4 160 FPS 121 FPS +32.2% (A)
Forza Horizon 5 210 FPS 85 FPS +147.1% (A)
GTA V 140 FPS 140 FPS
GTA V 80 FPS 127 FPS 58.8% (B)
Gears Tactics 135 FPS 115 FPS +17.4% (A)
Hitman 3 146 FPS 124 FPS +17.7% (A)
Hunt Showdown 116 FPS 101 FPS +14.9% (A)
Mafia Definitive Edition 95 FPS 90 FPS +5.6% (A)
Metro Exodus 95 FPS 61 FPS +55.7% (A)
Outriders 124 FPS 94 FPS +31.9% (A)
Overwatch 240 FPS 240 FPS
PUBG 140 FPS 140 FPS
Resident Evil 4 Remake 110 FPS 65 FPS +69.2% (A)
Resident Evil Village 160 FPS 126 FPS +27% (A)
Serious Sam 4 99 FPS 71 FPS +39.4% (A)
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 124 FPS 149 FPS 20.2% (B)
Star Wars Squadrons 269 FPS 228 FPS +18% (A)
The Witcher 3 188 FPS 122 FPS +54.1% (A)
The Witcher 3 140 FPS 116 FPS +20.7% (A)
Valorant 230 FPS 180 FPS +27.8% (A)
Watch Dogs Legion 96 FPS 82 FPS +17.1% (A)
X-Plane 11.11 52 FPS 72 FPS 38.5% (B)
Yakuza Like a Dragon 113 FPS 96 FPS +17.7% (A)

Specs from public sources (PassMark, Geekbench). FPS measured at 1080p medium settings.

Based on the comparison: GeForce RTX 3070 Ti wins 17 of the comparable criteria. The choice depends on your use case.

🤔 How to choose

Universal advice for any use case.

  • Reliability vs price: reliability (median 50) ↔ price (median 385.1).
  • Weight vs CPU: mobility (median 48) ↔ overall performance (median 49.8).
  • Upgradeability vs battery: upgradability (median 50) ↔ battery life (median 2.8).