Component comparison

GeForce RTX 3070 Ti vs GeForce RTX 2060

GeForce RTX 3070 Ti vs GeForce RTX 2060 — detailed GPU comparison: performance, gaming FPS, specifications.

Advantages

A GeForce RTX 3070 Ti
  • + Release year (+3)
  • + VRAM (GB) (+2 GB)
  • + Bandwidth (GB/s) (+272 GB/s)
  • + Memory bus (bit) (+64 bit)
  • + Lithography (nm) (-4 nm)
  • + Transistors (M) (+6,600M)
  • + Die size (mm²) (+53 mm²)
  • + CUDA cores (+4224)
  • + TMUs (+72)
  • + ROPs (+48)
  • + RT cores (+18)
  • + FP32 performance (TFLOPS) (+15.30 TFLOPS)
  • + Pixel fill rate (GPixel/s) (+89.26 GPixel/s)
  • + Texture fill rate (GTexel/s) (+138.20 GTexel/s)
  • + Energy efficiency (+9.8)
  • + PassMark (overall) (+3209)
  • + 3DMark Time Spy (+4321)
  • + 3DMark Fire Strike (+11445)
B GeForce RTX 2060
  • + Tensor cores (+48)
  • + Normalized score (+2.8)

Detailed spec comparison

Spec Component A
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti
Component B
GeForce RTX 2060
Release year 2022 (+3) 2019
VRAM (GB) 8 GB (+2 GB) 6 GB
Memory type GDDR6 GDDR6
Memory clock (MHz) 1750 MHz 1750 MHz
Bandwidth (GB/s) 608 GB/s (+272 GB/s) 336 GB/s
Memory bus (bit) 256 bit (+64 bit) 192 bit
TGP / TDP (W) 115 W 115 W
Lithography (nm) 8 nm (-4 nm) 12 nm
Transistors (M) 17,400M (+6,600M) 10,800M
Die size (mm²) 392 mm² (+53 mm²) 445 mm²
Base clock (MHz)
Boost clock (MHz)
CUDA cores 6,144 (+4224) 1,920
TMUs 192 (+72) 120
ROPs 96 (+48) 48
RT cores 48 (+18) 30
Tensor cores 192 240 (+48)
FP32 performance (TFLOPS) 21.75 TFLOPS (+15.30 TFLOPS) 6.45 TFLOPS
Pixel fill rate (GPixel/s) 169.90 GPixel/s (+89.26 GPixel/s) 80.64 GPixel/s
Texture fill rate (GTexel/s) 339.80 GTexel/s (+138.20 GTexel/s) 201.60 GTexel/s
Energy efficiency 27.9 (+9.8) 18.1
PassMark (overall) 17,303 (+3209) 14,094
3DMark Time Spy 10,462 (+4321) 6,141
3DMark Fire Strike 27,776 (+11445) 16,331
Geekbench OpenCL 71,412
Geekbench Vulkan 65,858
Normalized score 63.6 66.4 (+2.8)

Only in component A

ReBAR

In both

CUDA DLSS ray_tracing

FPS in games (1080p)

Game GeForce RTX 3070 Ti GeForce RTX 2060 Delta
Assassin´s Creed Valhalla 85 FPS 53 FPS +60.4% (A)
Battlefield 5 130 FPS 104 FPS +25% (A)
Borderlands 3 92 FPS 61 FPS +50.8% (A)
CS:GO 240 FPS 240 FPS
Counter-Strike 2 220 FPS 150 FPS +46.7% (A)
Crysis Remastered 72 FPS 53 FPS +35.8% (A)
Cyberpunk 2077 129 FPS 60 FPS +115% (A)
Cyberpunk 2077 1.0 67 FPS 45 FPS +48.9% (A)
Days Gone 115 FPS 87 FPS +32.2% (A)
Death Stranding 132 FPS 92 FPS +43.5% (A)
Dirt 5 98 FPS 59 FPS +66.1% (A)
Doom Eternal 196 FPS 112 FPS +75% (A)
Dota 2 146 FPS 118 FPS +23.7% (A)
Escape from Tarkov 120 FPS 121 FPS 0.8% (B)
F1 2021 139 FPS 126 FPS +10.3% (A)
Far Cry 5 138 FPS 96 FPS +43.8% (A)
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark 50 FPS 52 FPS 4% (B)
Flight Simulator 2020 70 FPS 42 FPS +66.7% (A)
Fortnite 180 FPS 162 FPS +11.1% (A)
Forza Horizon 4 160 FPS 108 FPS +48.1% (A)
Forza Horizon 5 210 FPS 100 FPS +110% (A)
GTA V 140 FPS 140 FPS
GTA V 80 FPS 95 FPS 18.8% (B)
Gears Tactics 135 FPS 93 FPS +45.2% (A)
Hitman 3 146 FPS 105 FPS +39% (A)
Hunt Showdown 116 FPS 75 FPS +54.7% (A)
Mafia Definitive Edition 95 FPS 60 FPS +58.3% (A)
Metro Exodus 95 FPS 56 FPS +69.6% (A)
Outriders 124 FPS 90 FPS +37.8% (A)
Overwatch 240 FPS 240 FPS
PUBG 140 FPS 140 FPS
Resident Evil 4 Remake 110 FPS 65 FPS +69.2% (A)
Resident Evil Village 160 FPS 95 FPS +68.4% (A)
Serious Sam 4 99 FPS 58 FPS +70.7% (A)
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 124 FPS 122 FPS +1.6% (A)
Star Wars Squadrons 269 FPS 173 FPS +55.5% (A)
The Witcher 3 188 FPS 111 FPS +69.4% (A)
The Witcher 3 140 FPS 74 FPS +89.2% (A)
Valorant 230 FPS 223 FPS +3.1% (A)
Watch Dogs Legion 96 FPS 66 FPS +45.5% (A)
X-Plane 11.11 52 FPS 56 FPS 7.7% (B)
Yakuza Like a Dragon 113 FPS 72 FPS +56.9% (A)

Specs from public sources (PassMark, Geekbench). FPS measured at 1080p medium settings.

Based on the comparison: GeForce RTX 3070 Ti wins 18 of the comparable criteria. The choice depends on your use case.

🤔 How to choose

Universal advice for any use case.

  • Reliability vs price: reliability (median 50) ↔ price (median 385.1).
  • Weight vs CPU: mobility (median 48) ↔ overall performance (median 49.8).
  • Upgradeability vs battery: upgradability (median 50) ↔ battery life (median 2.8).