Component comparison

GeForce RTX 3070 Ti vs GeForce RTX 2050

GeForce RTX 3070 Ti vs GeForce RTX 2050 β€” detailed GPU comparison: performance, gaming FPS, specifications.

Advantages

A GeForce RTX 3070 Ti
  • + Release year (+1)
  • + VRAM (GB) (+4 GB)
  • + Bandwidth (GB/s) (+496 GB/s)
  • + Memory bus (bit) (+192 bit)
  • + TGP / TDP (W) (+70 W)
  • + Transistors (M) (+8,700M)
  • + CUDA cores (+4096)
  • + TMUs (+128)
  • + ROPs (+64)
  • + RT cores (+16)
  • + Tensor cores (+128)
  • + FP32 performance (TFLOPS) (+17.02 TFLOPS)
  • + Pixel fill rate (GPixel/s) (+130.06 GPixel/s)
  • + Texture fill rate (GTexel/s) (+260.12 GTexel/s)
  • + 3DMark Time Spy (+7241)
  • + 3DMark Fire Strike (+18811)
  • + Normalized score (+8.4)
B GeForce RTX 2050
  • + Die size (mmΒ²) (+192 mmΒ²)
  • + Energy efficiency (+1.7)

Detailed spec comparison

Spec Component A
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti
Component B
GeForce RTX 2050
Release year 2022 (+1) 2021
VRAM (GB) 8 GB (+4 GB) 4 GB
Memory type GDDR6 GDDR6
Memory clock (MHz) 1750 MHz 1750 MHz
Bandwidth (GB/s) 608 GB/s (+496 GB/s) 112 GB/s
Memory bus (bit) 256 bit (+192 bit) 64 bit
TGP / TDP (W) 115 W (+70 W) 45 W
Lithography (nm) 8 nm 8 nm
Transistors (M) 17,400M (+8,700M) 8,700M
Die size (mmΒ²) 392 mmΒ² 200 mmΒ² (+192 mmΒ²)
Base clock (MHz) β€” 735 MHz
Boost clock (MHz) β€” 1245 MHz
CUDA cores 6,144 (+4096) 2,048
TMUs 192 (+128) 64
ROPs 96 (+64) 32
RT cores 48 (+16) 32
Tensor cores 192 (+128) 64
FP32 performance (TFLOPS) 21.75 TFLOPS (+17.02 TFLOPS) 4.73 TFLOPS
Pixel fill rate (GPixel/s) 169.90 GPixel/s (+130.06 GPixel/s) 39.84 GPixel/s
Texture fill rate (GTexel/s) 339.80 GTexel/s (+260.12 GTexel/s) 79.68 GTexel/s
Energy efficiency 27.9 29.6 (+1.7)
PassMark (overall) 17,303 β€”
3DMark Time Spy 10,462 (+7241) 3,221
3DMark Fire Strike 27,776 (+18811) 8,965
Geekbench OpenCL β€” 44,279
Geekbench Vulkan β€” 43,030
Normalized score 63.6 (+8.4) 55.2

Only in component A

ray_tracing

In both

CUDA DLSS ReBAR

FPS in games (1080p)

Game GeForce RTX 3070 Ti GeForce RTX 2050 Delta
A Plague Tale Requiem 71 FPS 21 FPS +238.1% (A)
Alan Wake Remastered 131 FPS 50 FPS +162% (A)
Armored Core 6 90 FPS 32 FPS +181.3% (A)
Assassin's Creed Mirage 102 FPS 25 FPS +308% (A)
AssassinΒ΄s Creed Valhalla 85 FPS 21 FPS +304.8% (A)
Atlas Fallen 119 FPS 43 FPS +176.7% (A)
Atomic Heart 95 FPS 30 FPS +216.7% (A)
Back 4 Blood 189 FPS 66 FPS +186.4% (A)
Baldur's Gate 3 95 FPS 30 FPS +216.7% (A)
Battlefield 5 130 FPS β‰ˆ 70 FPS +85.7% (A)
CS:GO 240 FPS β‰ˆ 240 FPS β‰ˆ
Call of Duty Modern Warfare 2 2022 87 FPS 18 FPS +383.3% (A)
Company of Heroes 3 148 FPS 27 FPS +448.1% (A)
Counter-Strike 2 220 FPS β‰ˆ 74 FPS +197.3% (A)
Crysis Remastered 72 FPS 25 FPS +188% (A)
Cyberpunk 2077 129 FPS 18 FPS +616.7% (A)
Cyberpunk 2077 1.6 65 FPS 19 FPS +242.1% (A)
Days Gone 115 FPS 45 FPS +155.6% (A)
Dead Island 2 173 FPS 31 FPS +458.1% (A)
Dead Space Remake 68 FPS 20 FPS +240% (A)
Death Stranding 132 FPS 50 FPS +164% (A)
Deathloop 98 FPS 30 FPS +226.7% (A)
Diablo 4 223 FPS 39 FPS +471.8% (A)
Dota 2 146 FPS 71 FPS +105.6% (A)
Dying Light 2 66 FPS 24 FPS +175% (A)
Elden Ring 60 FPS 39 FPS +53.8% (A)
Elex 2 83 FPS 32 FPS +159.4% (A)
Escape from Tarkov 120 FPS 70 FPS +71.4% (A)
F1 2021 139 FPS 66 FPS +110.6% (A)
F1 22 157 FPS 55 FPS +185.5% (A)
F1 23 178 FPS 37 FPS +381.1% (A)
Far Cry 5 138 FPS 35 FPS +294.3% (A)
Far Cry 6 89 FPS 43 FPS +107% (A)
Farming Simulator 22 149 FPS 63 FPS +136.5% (A)
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark 50 FPS 25 FPS +100% (A)
Flight Simulator 2020 70 FPS 19 FPS +268.4% (A)
Fortnite 180 FPS β‰ˆ 95 FPS +89.5% (A)
Forza Horizon 4 160 FPS β‰ˆ 70 FPS +128.6% (A)
Forza Horizon 5 210 FPS 53 FPS +296.2% (A)
GRID Legends 148 FPS 61 FPS +142.6% (A)
GTA V 140 FPS β‰ˆ 140 FPS β‰ˆ
GTA V 80 FPS 74 FPS +8.1% (A)
Gears Tactics 135 FPS 55 FPS +145.5% (A)
Ghostwire Tokyo 124 FPS 51 FPS +143.1% (A)
God of War 77 FPS 29 FPS +165.5% (A)
Guardians of the Galaxy 111 FPS 47 FPS +136.2% (A)
Halo Infinite 101 FPS 41 FPS +146.3% (A)
High On Life 118 FPS 35 FPS +237.1% (A)
Hitman 3 146 FPS 59 FPS +147.5% (A)
Hogwarts Legacy 70 FPS 26 FPS +169.2% (A)
Hunt Showdown 116 FPS 54 FPS +114.8% (A)
Immortals of Aveum 53 FPS 17 FPS +211.8% (A)
Lies of P 134 FPS 29 FPS +362.1% (A)
Lords of the Fallen 56 FPS 11 FPS +409.1% (A)
Mafia Definitive Edition 95 FPS 39 FPS +143.6% (A)
Metro Exodus 95 FPS β‰ˆ 35 FPS +171.4% (A)
Need for Speed Unbound 93 FPS 28 FPS +232.1% (A)
Outriders 124 FPS 34 FPS +264.7% (A)
Overwatch 240 FPS β‰ˆ 240 FPS β‰ˆ
PUBG 140 FPS β‰ˆ 140 FPS β‰ˆ
Rainbow Six Extraction 176 FPS 66 FPS +166.7% (A)
Ratchet & Clank Rift Apart 60 FPS 18 FPS +233.3% (A)
Resident Evil 4 Remake 110 FPS 17 FPS +547.1% (A)
Resident Evil Village 160 FPS 58 FPS +175.9% (A)
Returnal 103 FPS 21 FPS +390.5% (A)
Riders Republic 104 FPS 38 FPS +173.7% (A)
Serious Sam 4 99 FPS 32 FPS +209.4% (A)
Sons of the Forest 83 FPS 34 FPS +144.1% (A)
Spider-Man Miles Morales 93 FPS 32 FPS +190.6% (A)
Star Wars Jedi Survivor 74 FPS 20 FPS +270% (A)
Star Wars Squadrons 269 FPS 111 FPS +142.3% (A)
Starfield 50 FPS 16 FPS +212.5% (A)
The Crew Motorfest 60 FPS 24 FPS +150% (A)
The Quarry 98 FPS 31 FPS +216.1% (A)
The Witcher 3 188 FPS β‰ˆ 58 FPS +224.1% (A)
The Witcher 3 140 FPS 47 FPS +197.9% (A)
The Witcher 3 v4 81 FPS 19 FPS +326.3% (A)
Tiny Tina's Wonderlands 115 FPS 38 FPS +202.6% (A)
Uncharted Legacy of Thieves Collection 72 FPS 13 FPS +453.8% (A)
Valorant 230 FPS β‰ˆ 130 FPS +76.9% (A)
Vampire Bloodhunt 173 FPS 73 FPS +137% (A)
Watch Dogs Legion 96 FPS 39 FPS +146.2% (A)
X-Plane 11.11 52 FPS 59 FPS 13.5% (B)
Yakuza Like a Dragon 113 FPS 43 FPS +162.8% (A)

Specs from public sources (PassMark, Geekbench). FPS measured at 1080p medium settings. Values for GeForce RTX 2050 are model predictions (β‰ˆ); GeForce RTX 3070 Ti are direct measurements.

Based on the comparison: GeForce RTX 3070 Ti wins 17 of the comparable criteria. The choice depends on your use case.

πŸ€” How to choose

Universal advice for any use case.

  • Reliability vs price: reliability (median 50) ↔ price (median 385.1).
  • Weight vs CPU: mobility (median 48) ↔ overall performance (median 49.8).
  • Upgradeability vs battery: upgradability (median 50) ↔ battery life (median 2.8).