Component comparison
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti vs GeForce MX350
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti vs GeForce MX350 — detailed GPU comparison: performance, gaming FPS, specifications.
Advantages
A
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti
- + Release year (+2)
- + VRAM (GB) (+6 GB)
- + Bandwidth (GB/s) (+552 GB/s)
- + Memory bus (bit) (+192 bit)
- + TGP / TDP (W) (+95 W)
- + Lithography (nm) (-6 nm)
- + Transistors (M) (+14,100M)
- + CUDA cores (+5504)
- + TMUs (+160)
- + ROPs (+80)
- + FP32 performance (TFLOPS) (+20.55 TFLOPS)
- + Pixel fill rate (GPixel/s) (+146.41 GPixel/s)
- + Texture fill rate (GTexel/s) (+292.82 GTexel/s)
- + Energy efficiency (+1.8)
- + PassMark (overall) (+14485)
- + 3DMark Time Spy (+9126)
- + 3DMark Fire Strike (+23405)
- + Normalized score (+32.8)
B
GeForce MX350
- + Memory clock (MHz) (+2 MHz)
- + Die size (mm²) (+260 mm²)
Detailed spec comparison
| Spec |
Component A
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti
|
Component B
GeForce MX350
|
|---|---|---|
| Release year | 2022 (+2) | 2020 |
| VRAM (GB) | 8 GB (+6 GB) | 2 GB |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Memory clock (MHz) | 1750 MHz | 1752 MHz (+2 MHz) |
| Bandwidth (GB/s) | 608 GB/s (+552 GB/s) | 56 GB/s |
| Memory bus (bit) | 256 bit (+192 bit) | 64 bit |
| TGP / TDP (W) | 115 W (+95 W) | 20 W |
| Lithography (nm) | 8 nm (-6 nm) | 14 nm |
| Transistors (M) | 17,400M (+14,100M) | 3,300M |
| Die size (mm²) | 392 mm² | 132 mm² (+260 mm²) |
| Base clock (MHz) | — | 1354 MHz |
| Boost clock (MHz) | — | 1468 MHz |
| CUDA cores | 6,144 (+5504) | 640 |
| TMUs | 192 (+160) | 32 |
| ROPs | 96 (+80) | 16 |
| RT cores | 48 | — |
| Tensor cores | 192 | — |
| FP32 performance (TFLOPS) | 21.75 TFLOPS (+20.55 TFLOPS) | 1.20 TFLOPS |
| Pixel fill rate (GPixel/s) | 169.90 GPixel/s (+146.41 GPixel/s) | 23.49 GPixel/s |
| Texture fill rate (GTexel/s) | 339.80 GTexel/s (+292.82 GTexel/s) | 46.98 GTexel/s |
| Energy efficiency | 27.9 (+1.8) | 26.1 |
| PassMark (overall) | 17,303 (+14485) | 2,818 |
| 3DMark Time Spy | 10,462 (+9126) | 1,336 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike | 27,776 (+23405) | 4,371 |
| Geekbench OpenCL | — | 13,112 |
| Geekbench Vulkan | — | 13,369 |
| Normalized score | 63.6 (+32.8) | 30.8 |
Only in component A
DLSS
ReBAR
ray_tracing
In both
CUDA
FPS in games (1080p)
| Game | GeForce RTX 3070 Ti | GeForce MX350 | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|
| A Plague Tale Requiem | 71 FPS | 8 FPS | +787.5% (A) |
| Armored Core 6 | 90 FPS | 10 FPS | +800% (A) |
| Assassin´s Creed Valhalla | 85 FPS | 6 FPS | +1316.7% (A) |
| Atomic Heart | 95 FPS | 7 FPS | +1257.1% (A) |
| Back 4 Blood | 189 FPS | 29 FPS | +551.7% (A) |
| Baldur's Gate 3 | 95 FPS | 11 FPS | +763.6% (A) |
| Battlefield 5 | 130 FPS | 37 FPS | +251.4% (A) |
| Borderlands 3 | 92 FPS | 17 FPS | +441.2% (A) |
| CS:GO | 240 FPS | 240 FPS | ≈ |
| Call of Duty Modern Warfare 2 2022 | 87 FPS | 14 FPS | +521.4% (A) |
| Counter-Strike 2 | 220 FPS | 66 FPS | +233.3% (A) |
| Crysis Remastered | 72 FPS | 9 FPS | +700% (A) |
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 129 FPS | 16 FPS | +706.3% (A) |
| Cyberpunk 2077 1.0 | 67 FPS | 7 FPS | +857.1% (A) |
| Cyberpunk 2077 1.6 | 65 FPS | 6 FPS | +983.3% (A) |
| Days Gone | 115 FPS | 24 FPS | +379.2% (A) |
| Dead Island 2 | 173 FPS | 21 FPS | +723.8% (A) |
| Death Stranding | 132 FPS | 17 FPS | +676.5% (A) |
| Deathloop | 98 FPS | 7 FPS | +1300% (A) |
| Diablo 4 | 223 FPS | 27 FPS | +725.9% (A) |
| Dirt 5 | 98 FPS | 7 FPS | +1300% (A) |
| Dota 2 | 146 FPS | 83 FPS | +75.9% (A) |
| Elden Ring | 60 FPS | 15 FPS | +300% (A) |
| Escape from Tarkov | 120 FPS | 32 FPS | +275% (A) |
| F1 2021 | 139 FPS | 31 FPS | +348.4% (A) |
| F1 22 | 157 FPS | 20 FPS | +685% (A) |
| F1 23 | 178 FPS | 14 FPS | +1171.4% (A) |
| Far Cry 5 | 138 FPS | 27 FPS | +411.1% (A) |
| Far Cry 6 | 89 FPS | 11 FPS | +709.1% (A) |
| Farming Simulator 22 | 149 FPS | 32 FPS | +365.6% (A) |
| Final Fantasy XV Benchmark | 50 FPS | 11 FPS | +354.5% (A) |
| Flight Simulator 2020 | 70 FPS | 9 FPS | +677.8% (A) |
| Fortnite | 180 FPS | 82 FPS | +119.5% (A) |
| Forza Horizon 4 | 160 FPS | 37 FPS | +332.4% (A) |
| Forza Horizon 5 | 210 FPS | 25 FPS | +740% (A) |
| GRID Legends | 148 FPS | 25 FPS | +492% (A) |
| GTA V | 140 FPS | 140 FPS | ≈ |
| GTA V | 80 FPS | 46 FPS | +73.9% (A) |
| Gears Tactics | 135 FPS | 30 FPS | +350% (A) |
| Ghostwire Tokyo | 124 FPS | 15 FPS | +726.7% (A) |
| Hitman 3 | 146 FPS | 19 FPS | +668.4% (A) |
| Hunt Showdown | 116 FPS | 21 FPS | +452.4% (A) |
| Lies of P | 134 FPS | 19 FPS | +605.3% (A) |
| Mafia Definitive Edition | 95 FPS | 19 FPS | +400% (A) |
| Metro Exodus | 95 FPS | 12 FPS | +691.7% (A) |
| Outriders | 124 FPS | 22 FPS | +463.6% (A) |
| Overwatch | 240 FPS | 240 FPS | ≈ |
| PUBG | 140 FPS | 140 FPS | ≈ |
| Rainbow Six Extraction | 176 FPS | 18 FPS | +877.8% (A) |
| Resident Evil 4 Remake | 110 FPS | 18 FPS | +511.1% (A) |
| Resident Evil Village | 160 FPS | 14 FPS | +1042.9% (A) |
| Riders Republic | 104 FPS | 15 FPS | +593.3% (A) |
| Serious Sam 4 | 99 FPS | 4 FPS | +2375% (A) |
| Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 124 FPS | 25 FPS | +396% (A) |
| Sons of the Forest | 83 FPS | 13 FPS | +538.5% (A) |
| Star Wars Squadrons | 269 FPS | 50 FPS | +438% (A) |
| The Callisto Protocol | 71 FPS | 10 FPS | +610% (A) |
| The Quarry | 98 FPS | 11 FPS | +790.9% (A) |
| The Witcher 3 | 188 FPS | 27 FPS | +596.3% (A) |
| The Witcher 3 | 140 FPS | 21 FPS | +566.7% (A) |
| The Witcher 3 v4 | 81 FPS | 7 FPS | +1057.1% (A) |
| Tiny Tina's Wonderlands | 115 FPS | 8 FPS | +1337.5% (A) |
| Valorant | 230 FPS | 129 FPS | +78.3% (A) |
| Vampire Bloodhunt | 173 FPS | 35 FPS | +394.3% (A) |
| Watch Dogs Legion | 96 FPS | 13 FPS | +638.5% (A) |
| X-Plane 11.11 | 52 FPS | 30 FPS | +73.3% (A) |
| Yakuza Like a Dragon | 113 FPS | 20 FPS | +465% (A) |
Specs from public sources (PassMark, Geekbench). FPS measured at 1080p medium settings.
Based on the comparison:
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti wins 18 of the comparable criteria.
The choice depends on your use case.
🤔 How to choose
Universal advice for any use case.
- Reliability vs price: reliability (median 50) ↔ price (median 385.1).
- Weight vs CPU: mobility (median 48) ↔ overall performance (median 49.8).
- Upgradeability vs battery: upgradability (median 50) ↔ battery life (median 2.8).