Component comparison
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti vs GeForce GTX 1050 Ti
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti vs GeForce GTX 1050 Ti — detailed GPU comparison: performance, gaming FPS, specifications.
Advantages
A
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti
- + Release year (+6)
- + VRAM (GB) (+4 GB)
- + Bandwidth (GB/s) (+496 GB/s)
- + Memory bus (bit) (+128 bit)
- + TGP / TDP (W) (+40 W)
- + Lithography (nm) (-6 nm)
- + Transistors (M) (+14,100M)
- + CUDA cores (+5376)
- + TMUs (+144)
- + ROPs (+64)
- + FP32 performance (TFLOPS) (+19.57 TFLOPS)
- + Pixel fill rate (GPixel/s) (+125.36 GPixel/s)
- + Texture fill rate (GTexel/s) (+272.98 GTexel/s)
- + Energy efficiency (+12.2)
- + PassMark (overall) (+10940)
- + 3DMark Time Spy (+8201)
- + 3DMark Fire Strike (+20291)
- + Normalized score (+22.9)
B
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti
- + Die size (mm²) (+260 mm²)
Detailed spec comparison
| Spec |
Component A
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti
|
Component B
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti
|
|---|---|---|
| Release year | 2022 (+6) | 2016 |
| VRAM (GB) | 8 GB (+4 GB) | 4 GB |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Memory clock (MHz) | 1750 MHz | — |
| Bandwidth (GB/s) | 608 GB/s (+496 GB/s) | 112 GB/s |
| Memory bus (bit) | 256 bit (+128 bit) | 128 bit |
| TGP / TDP (W) | 115 W (+40 W) | 75 W |
| Lithography (nm) | 8 nm (-6 nm) | 14 nm |
| Transistors (M) | 17,400M (+14,100M) | 3,300M |
| Die size (mm²) | 392 mm² | 132 mm² (+260 mm²) |
| Base clock (MHz) | — | — |
| Boost clock (MHz) | — | — |
| CUDA cores | 6,144 (+5376) | 768 |
| TMUs | 192 (+144) | 48 |
| ROPs | 96 (+64) | 32 |
| RT cores | 48 | — |
| Tensor cores | 192 | — |
| FP32 performance (TFLOPS) | 21.75 TFLOPS (+19.57 TFLOPS) | 2.18 TFLOPS |
| Pixel fill rate (GPixel/s) | 169.90 GPixel/s (+125.36 GPixel/s) | 44.54 GPixel/s |
| Texture fill rate (GTexel/s) | 339.80 GTexel/s (+272.98 GTexel/s) | 66.82 GTexel/s |
| Energy efficiency | 27.9 (+12.2) | 15.8 |
| PassMark (overall) | 17,303 (+10940) | 6,363 |
| 3DMark Time Spy | 10,462 (+8201) | 2,261 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike | 27,776 (+20291) | 7,485 |
| Geekbench OpenCL | — | 20,654 |
| Geekbench Vulkan | — | 19,790 |
| Normalized score | 63.6 (+22.9) | 40.8 |
Only in component A
DLSS
ReBAR
ray_tracing
In both
CUDA
FPS in games (1080p)
| Game | GeForce RTX 3070 Ti | GeForce GTX 1050 Ti | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alan Wake Remastered | 131 FPS | 29 FPS | +351.7% (A) |
| Assassin´s Creed Valhalla | 85 FPS | 15 FPS | +466.7% (A) |
| Battlefield 2042 | 97 FPS | 13 FPS | +646.2% (A) |
| Battlefield 5 | 130 FPS | 57 FPS | +128.1% (A) |
| Borderlands 3 | 92 FPS | 28 FPS | +228.6% (A) |
| CS:GO | 240 FPS | 240 FPS | ≈ |
| Counter-Strike 2 | 220 FPS | 70 FPS | +214.3% (A) |
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 129 FPS | 27 FPS | +377.8% (A) |
| Cyberpunk 2077 1.6 | 65 FPS | 17 FPS | +282.4% (A) |
| Death Stranding | 132 FPS | 36 FPS | +266.7% (A) |
| Deathloop | 98 FPS | 21 FPS | +366.7% (A) |
| Dirt 5 | 98 FPS | 19 FPS | +415.8% (A) |
| Dota 2 | 146 FPS | 98 FPS | +49% (A) |
| Dying Light 2 | 66 FPS | 17 FPS | +288.2% (A) |
| Elden Ring | 60 FPS | 26 FPS | +130.8% (A) |
| Elex 2 | 83 FPS | 21 FPS | +295.2% (A) |
| Escape from Tarkov | 120 FPS | 45 FPS | +166.7% (A) |
| F1 22 | 157 FPS | 48 FPS | +227.1% (A) |
| Far Cry 5 | 138 FPS | 48 FPS | +187.5% (A) |
| Far Cry 6 | 89 FPS | 29 FPS | +206.9% (A) |
| Farming Simulator 22 | 149 FPS | 46 FPS | +223.9% (A) |
| Final Fantasy XV Benchmark | 50 FPS | 23 FPS | +117.4% (A) |
| Flight Simulator 2020 | 70 FPS | 17 FPS | +311.8% (A) |
| Fortnite | 180 FPS | 75 FPS | +140% (A) |
| Forza Horizon 4 | 160 FPS | 67 FPS | +138.8% (A) |
| Forza Horizon 5 | 210 FPS | 40 FPS | +425% (A) |
| GRID Legends | 148 FPS | 42 FPS | +252.4% (A) |
| GTA V | 140 FPS | 140 FPS | ≈ |
| GTA V | 80 FPS | 60 FPS | +33.3% (A) |
| Gears Tactics | 135 FPS | 49 FPS | +175.5% (A) |
| Ghostwire Tokyo | 124 FPS | 33 FPS | +275.8% (A) |
| God of War | 77 FPS | 12 FPS | +541.7% (A) |
| Hitman 3 | 146 FPS | 40 FPS | +265% (A) |
| Hunt Showdown | 116 FPS | 34 FPS | +241.2% (A) |
| Mafia Definitive Edition | 95 FPS | 33 FPS | +187.9% (A) |
| Metro Exodus | 95 FPS | 31 FPS | +206.5% (A) |
| Overwatch | 240 FPS | 240 FPS | ≈ |
| PUBG | 140 FPS | 140 FPS | ≈ |
| Rainbow Six Extraction | 176 FPS | 42 FPS | +319% (A) |
| Resident Evil 4 Remake | 110 FPS | 24 FPS | +358.3% (A) |
| Riders Republic | 104 FPS | 29 FPS | +258.6% (A) |
| Serious Sam 4 | 99 FPS | 22 FPS | +350% (A) |
| Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 124 FPS | 31 FPS | +300% (A) |
| Star Wars Squadrons | 269 FPS | 85 FPS | +216.5% (A) |
| The Quarry | 98 FPS | 24 FPS | +308.3% (A) |
| The Witcher 3 | 188 FPS | 46 FPS | +308.7% (A) |
| The Witcher 3 | 140 FPS | 21 FPS | +566.7% (A) |
| Tiny Tina's Wonderlands | 115 FPS | 24 FPS | +379.2% (A) |
| Valorant | 230 FPS | 110 FPS | +109.1% (A) |
| Vampire Bloodhunt | 173 FPS | 58 FPS | +198.3% (A) |
| Watch Dogs Legion | 96 FPS | 27 FPS | +255.6% (A) |
| X-Plane 11.11 | 52 FPS | 44 FPS | +18.2% (A) |
| Yakuza Like a Dragon | 113 FPS | 33 FPS | +242.4% (A) |
Specs from public sources (PassMark, Geekbench). FPS measured at 1080p medium settings.
Based on the comparison:
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti wins 18 of the comparable criteria.
The choice depends on your use case.
🤔 How to choose
Universal advice for any use case.
- Reliability vs price: reliability (median 50) ↔ price (median 385.1).
- Weight vs CPU: mobility (median 48) ↔ overall performance (median 49.8).
- Upgradeability vs battery: upgradability (median 50) ↔ battery life (median 2.8).