Component comparison

GeForce RTX 3070 Ti vs GeForce GTX 1050

GeForce RTX 3070 Ti vs GeForce GTX 1050 — detailed GPU comparison: performance, gaming FPS, specifications.

Advantages

A GeForce RTX 3070 Ti
  • + Release year (+5)
  • + VRAM (GB) (+6 GB)
  • + Bandwidth (GB/s) (+496 GB/s)
  • + Memory bus (bit) (+128 bit)
  • + TGP / TDP (W) (+40 W)
  • + Lithography (nm) (-6 nm)
  • + Transistors (M) (+14,100M)
  • + CUDA cores (+5376)
  • + TMUs (+144)
  • + ROPs (+72)
  • + FP32 performance (TFLOPS) (+19.54 TFLOPS)
  • + Pixel fill rate (GPixel/s) (+123.34 GPixel/s)
  • + Texture fill rate (GTexel/s) (+281.60 GTexel/s)
  • + Energy efficiency (+17.0)
  • + PassMark (overall) (+12255)
  • + 3DMark Fire Strike (+21708)
  • + Normalized score (+32.3)
B GeForce GTX 1050
  • + Memory clock (MHz) (+5258 MHz)
  • + Die size (mm²) (+260 mm²)

Detailed spec comparison

Spec Component A
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti
 Component B
GeForce GTX 1050
Release year 2022 (+5) 2017
VRAM (GB) 8 GB (+6 GB) 2 GB
Memory type GDDR6 GDDR5
Memory clock (MHz) 1750 MHz 7008 MHz (+5258 MHz)
Bandwidth (GB/s) 608 GB/s (+496 GB/s) 112 GB/s
Memory bus (bit) 256 bit (+128 bit) 128 bit
TGP / TDP (W) 115 W (+40 W) 75 W
Lithography (nm) 8 nm (-6 nm) 14 nm
Transistors (M) 17,400M (+14,100M) 3,300M
Die size (mm²) 392 mm² 132 mm² (+260 mm²)
Base clock (MHz) — —
Boost clock (MHz) — —
CUDA cores 6,144 (+5376) 768
TMUs 192 (+144) 48
ROPs 96 (+72) 24
RT cores 48 —
Tensor cores 192 —
FP32 performance (TFLOPS) 21.75 TFLOPS (+19.54 TFLOPS) 2.21 TFLOPS
Pixel fill rate (GPixel/s) 169.90 GPixel/s (+123.34 GPixel/s) 46.56 GPixel/s
Texture fill rate (GTexel/s) 339.80 GTexel/s (+281.60 GTexel/s) 58.20 GTexel/s
Energy efficiency 27.9 (+17.0) 11.0
PassMark (overall) 17,303 (+12255) 5,048
3DMark Time Spy 10,462 —
3DMark Fire Strike 27,776 (+21708) 6,068
Geekbench OpenCL — 17,429
Geekbench Vulkan — 15,766
Normalized score 63.6 (+32.3) 31.3

Only in component A

DLSS ReBAR ray_tracing

In both

CUDA

FPS in games (1080p)

Game GeForce RTX 3070 Ti GeForce GTX 1050 Delta
A Plague Tale Requiem 71 FPS 16 FPS +343.8% (A)
Alan Wake Remastered 131 FPS 27 FPS +385.2% (A)
Assassin´s Creed Valhalla 85 FPS 14 FPS +507.1% (A)
Atlas Fallen 119 FPS 26 FPS +357.7% (A)
Atomic Heart 95 FPS 20 FPS +375% (A)
Back 4 Blood 189 FPS 40 FPS +372.5% (A)
Baldur's Gate 3 95 FPS 16 FPS +493.8% (A)
Battlefield 2042 97 FPS 7 FPS +1285.7% (A)
Battlefield 5 130 FPS 51 FPS +154.9% (A)
Borderlands 3 92 FPS 23 FPS +300% (A)
CS:GO 240 FPS 240 FPS ≈
Call of Duty Modern Warfare 2 2022 87 FPS 21 FPS +314.3% (A)
Company of Heroes 3 148 FPS 31 FPS +377.4% (A)
Counter-Strike 2 220 FPS 65 FPS +238.5% (A)
Cyberpunk 2077 129 FPS 24 FPS +437.5% (A)
Cyberpunk 2077 1.6 65 FPS 14 FPS +364.3% (A)
Days Gone 115 FPS 32 FPS +259.4% (A)
Dead Island 2 173 FPS 34 FPS +408.8% (A)
Dead Space Remake 68 FPS 11 FPS +518.2% (A)
Death Stranding 132 FPS 30 FPS +340% (A)
Diablo 4 223 FPS 44 FPS +406.8% (A)
Dirt 5 98 FPS 16 FPS +512.5% (A)
Dota 2 146 FPS 126 FPS +15.9% (A)
Dying Light 2 66 FPS 14 FPS +371.4% (A)
Elden Ring 60 FPS 27 FPS +122.2% (A)
Elex 2 83 FPS 17 FPS +388.2% (A)
Escape from Tarkov 120 FPS 54 FPS +122.2% (A)
F1 2021 139 FPS 37 FPS +275.7% (A)
F1 22 157 FPS 38 FPS +313.2% (A)
F1 23 178 FPS 36 FPS +394.4% (A)
Far Cry 5 138 FPS 39 FPS +253.8% (A)
Far Cry 6 89 FPS 24 FPS +270.8% (A)
Farming Simulator 22 149 FPS 44 FPS +238.6% (A)
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark 50 FPS 18 FPS +177.8% (A)
Flight Simulator 2020 70 FPS 15 FPS +366.7% (A)
Fortnite 180 FPS 132 FPS +36.4% (A)
Forza Horizon 4 160 FPS 55 FPS +190.9% (A)
Forza Horizon 5 210 FPS 35 FPS +500% (A)
GRID Legends 148 FPS 40 FPS +270% (A)
GTA V 140 FPS 140 FPS ≈
GTA V 80 FPS 66 FPS +21.2% (A)
Gears Tactics 135 FPS 39 FPS +246.2% (A)
God of War 77 FPS 16 FPS +381.3% (A)
Guardians of the Galaxy 111 FPS 29 FPS +282.8% (A)
Halo Infinite 101 FPS 25 FPS +304% (A)
High On Life 118 FPS 27 FPS +337% (A)
Hitman 3 146 FPS 32 FPS +356.3% (A)
Hogwarts Legacy 70 FPS 17 FPS +311.8% (A)
Hunt Showdown 116 FPS 28 FPS +314.3% (A)
Mafia Definitive Edition 95 FPS 27 FPS +251.9% (A)
Metro Exodus 95 FPS 19 FPS +400% (A)
Need for Speed Unbound 93 FPS 23 FPS +304.3% (A)
New World 93 FPS 28 FPS +232.1% (A)
Outriders 124 FPS 27 FPS +359.3% (A)
Overwatch 240 FPS 240 FPS ≈
PUBG 140 FPS 140 FPS ≈
Rainbow Six Extraction 176 FPS 36 FPS +388.9% (A)
Ratchet & Clank Rift Apart 60 FPS 16 FPS +275% (A)
Resident Evil 4 Remake 110 FPS 24 FPS +358.3% (A)
Resident Evil Village 160 FPS 23 FPS +595.7% (A)
Returnal 103 FPS 20 FPS +415% (A)
Riders Republic 104 FPS 26 FPS +300% (A)
Serious Sam 4 99 FPS 15 FPS +560% (A)
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 124 FPS 39 FPS +217.9% (A)
Sons of the Forest 83 FPS 21 FPS +295.2% (A)
Spider-Man Miles Morales 93 FPS 29 FPS +220.7% (A)
Star Wars Jedi Survivor 74 FPS 13 FPS +469.2% (A)
Star Wars Squadrons 269 FPS 69 FPS +289.9% (A)
The Callisto Protocol 71 FPS 27 FPS +163% (A)
The Quarry 98 FPS 19 FPS +415.8% (A)
The Witcher 3 188 FPS 39 FPS +382.1% (A)
The Witcher 3 140 FPS 29 FPS +382.8% (A)
The Witcher 3 v4 81 FPS 32 FPS +153.1% (A)
Tiny Tina's Wonderlands 115 FPS 19 FPS +505.3% (A)
Uncharted Legacy of Thieves Collection 72 FPS 17 FPS +323.5% (A)
Valorant 230 FPS 100 FPS +130% (A)
Vampire Bloodhunt 173 FPS 50 FPS +246% (A)
Watch Dogs Legion 96 FPS 22 FPS +336.4% (A)
X-Plane 11.11 52 FPS 45 FPS +15.6% (A)
Yakuza Like a Dragon 113 FPS 27 FPS +318.5% (A)

Specs from public sources (PassMark, Geekbench). FPS measured at 1080p medium settings.

Based on the comparison: GeForce RTX 3070 Ti wins 17 of the comparable criteria. The choice depends on your use case.

🤔 How to choose

Universal advice for any use case.

  • Reliability vs price: reliability (median 50) ↔ price (median 385.1).
  • Weight vs CPU: mobility (median 48) ↔ overall performance (median 49.8).
  • Upgradeability vs battery: upgradability (median 50) ↔ battery life (median 2.8).
All reviews