Component comparison

GeForce RTX 3060 vs GeForce RTX 3070 Ti

GeForce RTX 3060 vs GeForce RTX 3070 Ti — detailed GPU comparison: performance, gaming FPS, specifications.

Advantages

A GeForce RTX 3060
  • + VRAM (GB) (+4 GB)
  • + Die size (mm²) (+116 mm²)
  • + Normalized score (+8.9)
B GeForce RTX 3070 Ti
  • + Release year (+1)
  • + Bandwidth (GB/s) (+248 GB/s)
  • + Memory bus (bit) (+64 bit)
  • + TGP / TDP (W) (+35 W)
  • + Transistors (M) (+5,400M)
  • + CUDA cores (+2304)
  • + TMUs (+72)
  • + ROPs (+48)
  • + RT cores (+18)
  • + Tensor cores (+72)
  • + FP32 performance (TFLOPS) (+10.81 TFLOPS)
  • + Pixel fill rate (GPixel/s) (+84.60 GPixel/s)
  • + Texture fill rate (GTexel/s) (+140.80 GTexel/s)
  • + Energy efficiency (+9.5)
  • + PassMark (overall) (+359)
  • + 3DMark Time Spy (+2240)
  • + 3DMark Fire Strike (+6087)

Detailed spec comparison

Spec Component A
GeForce RTX 3060
 Component B
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti
Release year 2021 2022 (+1)
VRAM (GB) 12 GB (+4 GB) 8 GB
Memory type GDDR6 GDDR6
Memory clock (MHz) — 1750 MHz
Bandwidth (GB/s) 360 GB/s 608 GB/s (+248 GB/s)
Memory bus (bit) 192 bit 256 bit (+64 bit)
TGP / TDP (W) 80 W 115 W (+35 W)
Lithography (nm) 8 nm 8 nm
Transistors (M) 12,000M 17,400M (+5,400M)
Die size (mm²) 276 mm² (+116 mm²) 392 mm²
Base clock (MHz) — —
Boost clock (MHz) — —
CUDA cores 3,840 6,144 (+2304)
TMUs 120 192 (+72)
ROPs 48 96 (+48)
RT cores 30 48 (+18)
Tensor cores 120 192 (+72)
FP32 performance (TFLOPS) 10.94 TFLOPS 21.75 TFLOPS (+10.81 TFLOPS)
Pixel fill rate (GPixel/s) 85.30 GPixel/s 169.90 GPixel/s (+84.60 GPixel/s)
Texture fill rate (GTexel/s) 199.00 GTexel/s 339.80 GTexel/s (+140.80 GTexel/s)
Energy efficiency 18.5 27.9 (+9.5)
PassMark (overall) 16,944 17,303 (+359)
3DMark Time Spy 8,222 10,462 (+2240)
3DMark Fire Strike 21,689 27,776 (+6087)
Geekbench OpenCL 88,251 —
Geekbench Vulkan 89,918 —
Normalized score 72.5 (+8.9) 63.6

Only in component B

ray_tracing

In both

CUDA DLSS ReBAR

FPS in games (1080p)

Game GeForce RTX 3060 GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Delta
A Plague Tale Requiem 44 FPS 71 FPS 61.4% (B)
Alan Wake Remastered 82 FPS 131 FPS 59.8% (B)
Assassin´s Creed Valhalla 57 FPS 85 FPS 49.1% (B)
Atomic Heart 75 FPS 95 FPS 26.7% (B)
Back 4 Blood 157 FPS 189 FPS 20.4% (B)
Battlefield 2042 74 FPS 97 FPS 31.1% (B)
Battlefield 5 110 FPS 130 FPS 18.2% (B)
Borderlands 3 84 FPS 92 FPS 9.5% (B)
CS:GO 240 FPS 240 FPS ≈
Call of Duty Modern Warfare 2 2022 77 FPS 87 FPS 13% (B)
Company of Heroes 3 123 FPS 148 FPS 20.3% (B)
Counter-Strike 2 170 FPS 220 FPS 29.4% (B)
Crysis Remastered 61 FPS 72 FPS 18% (B)
Cyberpunk 2077 103 FPS 129 FPS 25.2% (B)
Cyberpunk 2077 1.0 58 FPS 67 FPS 15.5% (B)
Cyberpunk 2077 1.6 42 FPS 65 FPS 54.8% (B)
Days Gone 95 FPS 115 FPS 21.1% (B)
Dead Space Remake 59 FPS 68 FPS 15.3% (B)
Death Stranding 99 FPS 132 FPS 33.3% (B)
Deathloop 72 FPS 98 FPS 36.1% (B)
Dirt 5 77 FPS 98 FPS 27.3% (B)
Doom Eternal 149 FPS 196 FPS 31.5% (B)
Dota 2 131 FPS 146 FPS 11.5% (B)
Dying Light 2 64 FPS 66 FPS 3.1% (B)
Elden Ring 59 FPS 60 FPS 1.7% (B)
Elex 2 73 FPS 83 FPS 13.7% (B)
F1 2021 119 FPS 139 FPS 16.8% (B)
F1 22 113 FPS 157 FPS 38.9% (B)
Far Cry 5 112 FPS 138 FPS 23.2% (B)
Far Cry 6 75 FPS 89 FPS 18.7% (B)
Farming Simulator 22 120 FPS 149 FPS 24.2% (B)
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark 55 FPS 50 FPS +10% (A)
Flight Simulator 2020 63 FPS 70 FPS 11.1% (B)
Fortnite 140 FPS 180 FPS 28.6% (B)
Forza Horizon 4 110 FPS 160 FPS 45.5% (B)
Forza Horizon 5 120 FPS 210 FPS 75% (B)
GRID Legends 131 FPS 148 FPS 13% (B)
GTA V 140 FPS 140 FPS ≈
GTA V 120 FPS 80 FPS +50% (A)
Ghostwire Tokyo 122 FPS 124 FPS 1.6% (B)
God of War 73 FPS 77 FPS 5.5% (B)
Guardians of the Galaxy 89 FPS 111 FPS 24.7% (B)
Halo Infinite 92 FPS 101 FPS 9.8% (B)
High On Life 99 FPS 118 FPS 19.2% (B)
Hitman 3 111 FPS 146 FPS 31.5% (B)
Hogwarts Legacy 70 FPS 70 FPS ≈
Hunt Showdown 93 FPS 116 FPS 24.7% (B)
Mafia Definitive Edition 86 FPS 95 FPS 10.5% (B)
Metro Exodus 81 FPS 95 FPS 17.3% (B)
Need for Speed Unbound 73 FPS 93 FPS 27.4% (B)
New World 66 FPS 93 FPS 40.9% (B)
Outriders 86 FPS 124 FPS 44.2% (B)
Overwatch 240 FPS 240 FPS ≈
PUBG 140 FPS 140 FPS ≈
Rainbow Six Extraction 155 FPS 176 FPS 13.5% (B)
Resident Evil 4 Remake 124 FPS 110 FPS +12.7% (A)
Resident Evil Village 129 FPS 160 FPS 24% (B)
Returnal 85 FPS 103 FPS 21.2% (B)
Riders Republic 86 FPS 104 FPS 20.9% (B)
Serious Sam 4 75 FPS 99 FPS 32% (B)
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 116 FPS 124 FPS 6.9% (B)
Sons of the Forest 66 FPS 83 FPS 25.8% (B)
Spider-Man Miles Morales 80 FPS 93 FPS 16.3% (B)
Star Wars Squadrons 178 FPS 269 FPS 51.1% (B)
Starfield 40 FPS 50 FPS 25% (B)
The Callisto Protocol 56 FPS 71 FPS 26.8% (B)
The Quarry 76 FPS 98 FPS 28.9% (B)
The Witcher 3 142 FPS 188 FPS 32.4% (B)
The Witcher 3 81 FPS 140 FPS 72.8% (B)
The Witcher 3 v4 108 FPS 81 FPS +33.3% (A)
Tiny Tina's Wonderlands 95 FPS 115 FPS 21.1% (B)
Uncharted Legacy of Thieves Collection 65 FPS 72 FPS 10.8% (B)
Valorant 190 FPS 230 FPS 21.1% (B)
Vampire Bloodhunt 157 FPS 173 FPS 10.2% (B)
Watch Dogs Legion 62 FPS 96 FPS 54.8% (B)
X-Plane 11.11 62 FPS 52 FPS +19.2% (A)
Yakuza Like a Dragon 105 FPS 113 FPS 7.6% (B)

Specs from public sources (PassMark, Geekbench). FPS measured at 1080p medium settings.

Based on the comparison: GeForce RTX 3070 Ti wins 17 of the comparable criteria. The choice depends on your use case.

🤔 How to choose

Universal advice for any use case.

  • Reliability vs price: reliability (median 50) ↔ price (median 385.1).
  • Weight vs CPU: mobility (median 48) ↔ overall performance (median 49.8).
  • Upgradeability vs battery: upgradability (median 50) ↔ battery life (median 2.8).
All reviews