Component comparison

GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile vs GeForce RTX 3080 Ti

GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile vs GeForce RTX 3080 Ti — detailed GPU comparison: performance, gaming FPS, specifications.

Advantages

A GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile
  • + Die size (mm²) (+352 mm²)
  • + Energy efficiency (+4.3)
  • + Normalized score (+6.2)
B GeForce RTX 3080 Ti
  • + VRAM (GB) (+6 GB)
  • + Bandwidth (GB/s) (+576 GB/s)
  • + Memory bus (bit) (+192 bit)
  • + Transistors (M) (+16,300M)
  • + CUDA cores (+6400)
  • + TMUs (+200)
  • + ROPs (+64)
  • + RT cores (+50)
  • + Tensor cores (+200)
  • + FP32 performance (TFLOPS) (+23.16 TFLOPS)
  • + Pixel fill rate (GPixel/s) (+118.10 GPixel/s)
  • + Texture fill rate (GTexel/s) (+361.80 GTexel/s)
  • + PassMark (overall) (+14210)
  • + 3DMark Fire Strike (+25424)
  • + Geekbench OpenCL (+120830)

Detailed spec comparison

Spec Component A
GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile
 Component B
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti
Release year 2021 2021
VRAM (GB) 6 GB 12 GB (+6 GB)
Memory type GDDR6 GDDR6X
Memory clock (MHz) 1750 MHz —
Bandwidth (GB/s) 336 GB/s 912 GB/s (+576 GB/s)
Memory bus (bit) 192 bit 384 bit (+192 bit)
TGP / TDP (W) 80 W —
Lithography (nm) 8 nm 8 nm
Transistors (M) 12,000M 28,300M (+16,300M)
Die size (mm²) 276 mm² (+352 mm²) 628 mm²
Base clock (MHz) 900 MHz —
Boost clock (MHz) 1425 MHz —
CUDA cores 3,840 10,240 (+6400)
TMUs 120 320 (+200)
ROPs 48 112 (+64)
RT cores 30 80 (+50)
Tensor cores 120 320 (+200)
FP32 performance (TFLOPS) 10.94 TFLOPS 34.10 TFLOPS (+23.16 TFLOPS)
Pixel fill rate (GPixel/s) 68.40 GPixel/s 186.50 GPixel/s (+118.10 GPixel/s)
Texture fill rate (GTexel/s) 171.00 GTexel/s 532.80 GTexel/s (+361.80 GTexel/s)
Energy efficiency 18.5 (+4.3) 14.2
PassMark (overall) 12,550 26,760 (+14210)
3DMark Time Spy 8,222 —
3DMark Fire Strike 21,689 47,113 (+25424)
Geekbench OpenCL 88,251 209,081 (+120830)
Geekbench Vulkan 89,918 —
Normalized score 72.5 (+6.2) 66.3

Only in component B

ray_tracing

In both

CUDA DLSS ReBAR

FPS in games (1080p)

Game GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Delta
A Plague Tale Requiem 44 FPS 64 FPS 45.5% (B)
Alan Wake Remastered 82 FPS 119 FPS 45.1% (B)
Assassin´s Creed Valhalla 57 FPS 99 FPS 73.7% (B)
Atomic Heart 75 FPS 100 FPS 33.3% (B)
Back 4 Blood 157 FPS 263 FPS 67.5% (B)
Battlefield 2042 74 FPS 121 FPS 63.5% (B)
Battlefield 5 110 FPS 170 FPS 54.5% (B)
Borderlands 3 84 FPS 100 FPS 19% (B)
CS:GO 240 FPS 240 FPS ≈
Call of Duty Modern Warfare 2 2022 77 FPS 109 FPS 41.6% (B)
Company of Heroes 3 123 FPS 175 FPS 42.3% (B)
Counter-Strike 2 170 FPS 300 FPS 76.5% (B)
Crysis Remastered 61 FPS 103 FPS 68.9% (B)
Cyberpunk 2077 103 FPS 219 FPS 112.6% (B)
Cyberpunk 2077 1.0 58 FPS 101 FPS 74.1% (B)
Cyberpunk 2077 1.6 42 FPS 64 FPS 52.4% (B)
Days Gone 95 FPS 177 FPS 86.3% (B)
Dead Space Remake 59 FPS 95 FPS 61% (B)
Death Stranding 99 FPS 151 FPS 52.5% (B)
Deathloop 72 FPS 133 FPS 84.7% (B)
Dirt 5 77 FPS 137 FPS 77.9% (B)
Doom Eternal 149 FPS 292 FPS 96% (B)
Dota 2 131 FPS 234 FPS 78.6% (B)
Dying Light 2 64 FPS 69 FPS 7.8% (B)
Elex 2 73 FPS 43 FPS +69.8% (A)
F1 2020 138 FPS 255 FPS 84.8% (B)
F1 2021 119 FPS 182 FPS 52.9% (B)
F1 22 113 FPS 172 FPS 52.2% (B)
FIFA 23 72 FPS 81 FPS 12.5% (B)
Far Cry 5 112 FPS 208 FPS 85.7% (B)
Far Cry 6 75 FPS 91 FPS 21.3% (B)
Far Cry New Dawn 89 FPS 108 FPS 21.3% (B)
Farming Simulator 22 120 FPS 183 FPS 52.5% (B)
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark 55 FPS 31 FPS +77.4% (A)
Flight Simulator 2020 63 FPS 79 FPS 25.4% (B)
Fortnite 140 FPS 300 FPS 114.3% (B)
Forza Horizon 4 110 FPS 250 FPS 127.3% (B)
Forza Horizon 5 120 FPS 200 FPS 66.7% (B)
GRID Legends 131 FPS 117 FPS +12% (A)
GTA V 140 FPS 140 FPS ≈
GTA V 120 FPS 153 FPS 27.5% (B)
Ghostwire Tokyo 122 FPS 126 FPS 3.3% (B)
God of War 73 FPS 110 FPS 50.7% (B)
Guardians of the Galaxy 89 FPS 112 FPS 25.8% (B)
Halo Infinite 92 FPS 147 FPS 59.8% (B)
High On Life 99 FPS 154 FPS 55.6% (B)
Hitman 3 111 FPS 197 FPS 77.5% (B)
Hogwarts Legacy 70 FPS 89 FPS 27.1% (B)
Horizon Zero Dawn 76 FPS 130 FPS 71.1% (B)
Hunt Showdown 93 FPS 168 FPS 80.6% (B)
Mafia Definitive Edition 86 FPS 151 FPS 75.6% (B)
Metro Exodus 81 FPS 172 FPS 112.3% (B)
Need for Speed Unbound 73 FPS 107 FPS 46.6% (B)
New World 66 FPS 97 FPS 47% (B)
Outriders 86 FPS 155 FPS 80.2% (B)
Overwatch 240 FPS 240 FPS ≈
PUBG 140 FPS 140 FPS ≈
Rainbow Six Extraction 155 FPS 157 FPS 1.3% (B)
Resident Evil 4 Remake 124 FPS 190 FPS 53.2% (B)
Resident Evil Village 129 FPS 232 FPS 79.8% (B)
Returnal 85 FPS 114 FPS 34.1% (B)
Riders Republic 86 FPS 101 FPS 17.4% (B)
Serious Sam 4 75 FPS 109 FPS 45.3% (B)
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 116 FPS 156 FPS 34.5% (B)
Sons of the Forest 66 FPS 86 FPS 30.3% (B)
Spider-Man Miles Morales 80 FPS 117 FPS 46.3% (B)
Star Wars Squadrons 178 FPS 378 FPS 112.4% (B)
Starfield 40 FPS 58 FPS 45% (B)
The Callisto Protocol 56 FPS 95 FPS 69.6% (B)
The Last of Us 55 FPS 88 FPS 60% (B)
The Quarry 76 FPS 126 FPS 65.8% (B)
The Witcher 3 142 FPS 372 FPS 162% (B)
The Witcher 3 81 FPS 144 FPS 77.8% (B)
The Witcher 3 v4 108 FPS 168 FPS 55.6% (B)
Tiny Tina's Wonderlands 95 FPS 124 FPS 30.5% (B)
Uncharted Legacy of Thieves Collection 65 FPS 86 FPS 32.3% (B)
Valorant 190 FPS 350 FPS 84.2% (B)
Vampire Bloodhunt 157 FPS 252 FPS 60.5% (B)
Watch Dogs Legion 62 FPS 107 FPS 72.6% (B)
X-Plane 11.11 62 FPS 33 FPS +87.9% (A)
Yakuza Like a Dragon 105 FPS 160 FPS 52.4% (B)

Specs from public sources (PassMark, Geekbench). FPS measured at 1080p medium settings.

Based on the comparison: GeForce RTX 3080 Ti wins 15 of the comparable criteria. The choice depends on your use case.

🤔 How to choose

Universal advice for any use case.

  • Reliability vs price: reliability (median 50) ↔ price (median 385.1).
  • Weight vs CPU: mobility (median 48) ↔ overall performance (median 49.8).
  • Upgradeability vs battery: upgradability (median 50) ↔ battery life (median 2.8).
All reviews