Component comparison

GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile vs GeForce MX350

GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile vs GeForce MX350 — detailed GPU comparison: performance, gaming FPS, specifications.

Advantages

A GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile
  • + Release year (+1)
  • + VRAM (GB) (+4 GB)
  • + Bandwidth (GB/s) (+280 GB/s)
  • + Memory bus (bit) (+128 bit)
  • + TGP / TDP (W) (+60 W)
  • + Lithography (nm) (-6 nm)
  • + Transistors (M) (+8,700M)
  • + CUDA cores (+3200)
  • + TMUs (+88)
  • + ROPs (+32)
  • + FP32 performance (TFLOPS) (+9.74 TFLOPS)
  • + Pixel fill rate (GPixel/s) (+44.91 GPixel/s)
  • + Texture fill rate (GTexel/s) (+124.02 GTexel/s)
  • + PassMark (overall) (+9732)
  • + 3DMark Time Spy (+6886)
  • + 3DMark Fire Strike (+17318)
  • + Geekbench OpenCL (+75139)
  • + Geekbench Vulkan (+76549)
  • + Normalized score (+41.8)
B GeForce MX350
  • + Memory clock (MHz) (+2 MHz)
  • + Die size (mm²) (+144 mm²)
  • + Base clock (MHz) (+454 MHz)
  • + Boost clock (MHz) (+43 MHz)
  • + Energy efficiency (+7.7)

Detailed spec comparison

Spec Component A
GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile
 Component B
GeForce MX350
Release year 2021 (+1) 2020
VRAM (GB) 6 GB (+4 GB) 2 GB
Memory type GDDR6 GDDR5
Memory clock (MHz) 1750 MHz 1752 MHz (+2 MHz)
Bandwidth (GB/s) 336 GB/s (+280 GB/s) 56 GB/s
Memory bus (bit) 192 bit (+128 bit) 64 bit
TGP / TDP (W) 80 W (+60 W) 20 W
Lithography (nm) 8 nm (-6 nm) 14 nm
Transistors (M) 12,000M (+8,700M) 3,300M
Die size (mm²) 276 mm² 132 mm² (+144 mm²)
Base clock (MHz) 900 MHz 1354 MHz (+454 MHz)
Boost clock (MHz) 1425 MHz 1468 MHz (+43 MHz)
CUDA cores 3,840 (+3200) 640
TMUs 120 (+88) 32
ROPs 48 (+32) 16
RT cores 30 —
Tensor cores 120 —
FP32 performance (TFLOPS) 10.94 TFLOPS (+9.74 TFLOPS) 1.20 TFLOPS
Pixel fill rate (GPixel/s) 68.40 GPixel/s (+44.91 GPixel/s) 23.49 GPixel/s
Texture fill rate (GTexel/s) 171.00 GTexel/s (+124.02 GTexel/s) 46.98 GTexel/s
Energy efficiency 18.5 26.1 (+7.7)
PassMark (overall) 12,550 (+9732) 2,818
3DMark Time Spy 8,222 (+6886) 1,336
3DMark Fire Strike 21,689 (+17318) 4,371
Geekbench OpenCL 88,251 (+75139) 13,112
Geekbench Vulkan 89,918 (+76549) 13,369
Normalized score 72.5 (+41.8) 30.8

Only in component A

DLSS ReBAR

In both

CUDA

FPS in games (1080p)

Game GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile GeForce MX350 Delta
A Plague Tale Requiem 44 FPS 8 FPS +450% (A)
Anno 1800 80 FPS 19 FPS +321.1% (A)
Apex Legends 135 FPS 28 FPS +382.1% (A)
Assassin´s Creed Valhalla 57 FPS 6 FPS +850% (A)
Atomic Heart 75 FPS 7 FPS +971.4% (A)
Back 4 Blood 157 FPS 29 FPS +441.4% (A)
Battlefield 5 110 FPS 37 FPS +197.3% (A)
Borderlands 3 84 FPS 17 FPS +394.1% (A)
CS:GO 240 FPS 240 FPS ≈
Call of Duty Black Ops Cold War 60 FPS 10 FPS +500% (A)
Call of Duty Modern Warfare 2 2022 77 FPS 14 FPS +450% (A)
Control 78 FPS 12 FPS +550% (A)
Counter-Strike 2 170 FPS 66 FPS +157.6% (A)
Crysis Remastered 61 FPS 9 FPS +577.8% (A)
Cyberpunk 2077 103 FPS 16 FPS +543.8% (A)
Cyberpunk 2077 1.0 58 FPS 7 FPS +728.6% (A)
Cyberpunk 2077 1.6 42 FPS 6 FPS +600% (A)
Days Gone 95 FPS 24 FPS +295.8% (A)
Death Stranding 99 FPS 17 FPS +482.4% (A)
Deathloop 72 FPS 7 FPS +928.6% (A)
Dirt 5 77 FPS 7 FPS +1000% (A)
Dota 2 131 FPS 83 FPS +57.8% (A)
Elden Ring 59 FPS 15 FPS +293.3% (A)
F1 2020 138 FPS 33 FPS +318.2% (A)
F1 2021 119 FPS 31 FPS +283.9% (A)
F1 22 113 FPS 20 FPS +465% (A)
FIFA 21 121 FPS 88 FPS +37.5% (A)
Far Cry 5 112 FPS 27 FPS +314.8% (A)
Far Cry 6 75 FPS 11 FPS +581.8% (A)
Far Cry New Dawn 89 FPS 25 FPS +256% (A)
Farming Simulator 22 120 FPS 32 FPS +275% (A)
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark 55 FPS 11 FPS +400% (A)
Flight Simulator 2020 63 FPS 9 FPS +600% (A)
Fortnite 140 FPS 82 FPS +70.7% (A)
Forza Horizon 4 110 FPS 37 FPS +197.3% (A)
Forza Horizon 5 120 FPS 25 FPS +380% (A)
GRID 2019 95 FPS 18 FPS +427.8% (A)
GRID Legends 131 FPS 25 FPS +424% (A)
GTA V 140 FPS 140 FPS ≈
GTA V 120 FPS 46 FPS +160.9% (A)
Ghostwire Tokyo 122 FPS 15 FPS +713.3% (A)
Hitman 3 111 FPS 19 FPS +484.2% (A)
Horizon Zero Dawn 76 FPS 12 FPS +533.3% (A)
Hunt Showdown 93 FPS 21 FPS +342.9% (A)
Immortals Fenyx Rising 81 FPS 10 FPS +710% (A)
Mafia Definitive Edition 86 FPS 19 FPS +352.6% (A)
Metro Exodus 81 FPS 12 FPS +575% (A)
Monster Hunter Stories 2 143 FPS 57 FPS +150.9% (A)
Need for Speed Heat 102 FPS 23 FPS +343.5% (A)
Outriders 86 FPS 22 FPS +290.9% (A)
Overwatch 240 FPS 240 FPS ≈
PUBG 140 FPS 140 FPS ≈
Rage 2 116 FPS 15 FPS +673.3% (A)
Rainbow Six Extraction 155 FPS 18 FPS +761.1% (A)
Resident Evil 4 Remake 124 FPS 18 FPS +588.9% (A)
Resident Evil Village 129 FPS 14 FPS +821.4% (A)
Riders Republic 86 FPS 15 FPS +473.3% (A)
Serious Sam 4 75 FPS 4 FPS +1775% (A)
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 116 FPS 25 FPS +364% (A)
Sons of the Forest 66 FPS 13 FPS +407.7% (A)
Star Wars Jedi Fallen Order 99 FPS 19 FPS +421.1% (A)
Star Wars Squadrons 178 FPS 50 FPS +256% (A)
The Callisto Protocol 56 FPS 10 FPS +460% (A)
The Division 2 115 FPS 20 FPS +475% (A)
The Quarry 76 FPS 11 FPS +590.9% (A)
The Witcher 3 142 FPS 27 FPS +425.9% (A)
The Witcher 3 81 FPS 21 FPS +285.7% (A)
The Witcher 3 v4 108 FPS 7 FPS +1442.9% (A)
Tiny Tina's Wonderlands 95 FPS 8 FPS +1087.5% (A)
Valorant 190 FPS 129 FPS +47.3% (A)
Vampire Bloodhunt 157 FPS 35 FPS +348.6% (A)
Watch Dogs Legion 62 FPS 13 FPS +376.9% (A)
X-Plane 11.11 62 FPS 30 FPS +106.7% (A)
Yakuza Like a Dragon 105 FPS 20 FPS +425% (A)

Specs from public sources (PassMark, Geekbench). FPS measured at 1080p medium settings.

Based on the comparison: GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile wins 19 of the comparable criteria. The choice depends on your use case.

🤔 How to choose

Universal advice for any use case.

  • Reliability vs price: reliability (median 50) ↔ price (median 385.1).
  • Weight vs CPU: mobility (median 48) ↔ overall performance (median 49.8).
  • Upgradeability vs battery: upgradability (median 50) ↔ battery life (median 2.8).
All reviews