Component comparison

GeForce RTX 3050 vs RTX A1000

GeForce RTX 3050 vs RTX A1000 — detailed GPU comparison: performance, gaming FPS, specifications.

Advantages

A GeForce RTX 3050
  • + TGP / TDP (W) (+25 W)
  • + PassMark (overall) (+1125)
  • + Geekbench OpenCL (+9821)
  • + Geekbench Vulkan (+11720)
  • + Normalized score (+5.9)
B RTX A1000
  • + Release year (+3)
  • + VRAM (GB) (+4 GB)
  • + Bandwidth (GB/s) (+32 GB/s)
  • + CUDA cores (+256)
  • + TMUs (+8)
  • + RT cores (+2)
  • + Tensor cores (+8)
  • + FP32 performance (TFLOPS) (+1.24 TFLOPS)
  • + Energy efficiency (+22.9)

Detailed spec comparison

Spec Component A
GeForce RTX 3050
Component B
RTX A1000
Release year 2021 2024 (+3)
VRAM (GB) 4 GB 8 GB (+4 GB)
Memory type GDDR6 GDDR6
Memory clock (MHz) 1500 MHz 1500 MHz
Bandwidth (GB/s) 192 GB/s 224 GB/s (+32 GB/s)
Memory bus (bit) 128 bit 128 bit
TGP / TDP (W) 75 W (+25 W) 50 W
Lithography (nm) 8 nm 8 nm
Transistors (M) 8,700M —
Die size (mm²) 200 mm² —
Base clock (MHz) 1065 MHz —
Boost clock (MHz) 1343 MHz —
CUDA cores 2,048 2,304 (+256)
TMUs 64 72 (+8)
ROPs 32 32
RT cores 16 18 (+2)
Tensor cores 64 72 (+8)
FP32 performance (TFLOPS) 5.50 TFLOPS 6.74 TFLOPS (+1.24 TFLOPS)
Pixel fill rate (GPixel/s) 42.98 GPixel/s —
Texture fill rate (GTexel/s) 85.95 GTexel/s —
Energy efficiency 17.0 39.9 (+22.9)
PassMark (overall) 11,878 (+1125) 10,753
3DMark Time Spy 4,497 —
3DMark Fire Strike 11,949 —
Geekbench OpenCL 63,465 (+9821) 53,644
Geekbench Vulkan 62,164 (+11720) 50,444
Normalized score 63.1 (+5.9) 57.2

Only in component B

CUDA DLSS

In both

ReBAR

FPS in games (1080p)

Game GeForce RTX 3050 RTX A1000 Delta
CS:GO 240 FPS 240 FPS ≈
GTA V 140 FPS 140 FPS ≈
Overwatch 240 FPS 240 FPS ≈
PUBG 140 FPS 140 FPS ≈

Specs from public sources (PassMark, Geekbench). FPS measured at 1080p medium settings.

Based on the comparison: RTX A1000 wins 9 of the comparable criteria. The choice depends on your use case.

🤔 How to choose

Universal advice for any use case.

  • Reliability vs price: reliability (median 50) ↔ price (median 385.1).
  • Weight vs CPU: mobility (median 48) ↔ overall performance (median 49.8).
  • Upgradeability vs battery: upgradability (median 50) ↔ battery life (median 2.8).