Component comparison
GeForce RTX 2050 vs GeForce RTX 2070
GeForce RTX 2050 vs GeForce RTX 2070 — detailed GPU comparison: performance, gaming FPS, specifications.
Advantages
A
GeForce RTX 2050
- + Release year (+3)
- + Lithography (nm) (-4 nm)
- + Die size (mm²) (+245 mm²)
- + Energy efficiency (+12.6)
B
GeForce RTX 2070
- + VRAM (GB) (+4 GB)
- + Bandwidth (GB/s) (+336 GB/s)
- + Memory bus (bit) (+192 bit)
- + TGP / TDP (W) (+35 W)
- + Transistors (M) (+2,100M)
- + CUDA cores (+256)
- + TMUs (+80)
- + ROPs (+32)
- + RT cores (+4)
- + Tensor cores (+224)
- + FP32 performance (TFLOPS) (+0.73 TFLOPS)
- + Pixel fill rate (GPixel/s) (+63.86 GPixel/s)
- + Texture fill rate (GTexel/s) (+153.62 GTexel/s)
- + 3DMark Time Spy (+3440)
- + 3DMark Fire Strike (+14221)
- + Geekbench OpenCL (+44158)
- + Geekbench Vulkan (+40378)
- + Normalized score (+15.3)
Detailed spec comparison
| Spec |
Component A
GeForce RTX 2050
|
Component B
GeForce RTX 2070
|
|---|---|---|
| Release year | 2021 (+3) | 2018 |
| VRAM (GB) | 4 GB | 8 GB (+4 GB) |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory clock (MHz) | 1750 MHz | — |
| Bandwidth (GB/s) | 112 GB/s | 448 GB/s (+336 GB/s) |
| Memory bus (bit) | 64 bit | 256 bit (+192 bit) |
| TGP / TDP (W) | 45 W | 80 W (+35 W) |
| Lithography (nm) | 8 nm (-4 nm) | 12 nm |
| Transistors (M) | 8,700M | 10,800M (+2,100M) |
| Die size (mm²) | 200 mm² (+245 mm²) | 445 mm² |
| Base clock (MHz) | 735 MHz | — |
| Boost clock (MHz) | 1245 MHz | — |
| CUDA cores | 2,048 | 2,304 (+256) |
| TMUs | 64 | 144 (+80) |
| ROPs | 32 | 64 (+32) |
| RT cores | 32 | 36 (+4) |
| Tensor cores | 64 | 288 (+224) |
| FP32 performance (TFLOPS) | 4.73 TFLOPS | 5.46 TFLOPS (+0.73 TFLOPS) |
| Pixel fill rate (GPixel/s) | 39.84 GPixel/s | 103.70 GPixel/s (+63.86 GPixel/s) |
| Texture fill rate (GTexel/s) | 79.68 GTexel/s | 233.30 GTexel/s (+153.62 GTexel/s) |
| Energy efficiency | 29.6 (+12.6) | 17.0 |
| PassMark (overall) | — | 16,063 |
| 3DMark Time Spy | 3,221 | 6,661 (+3440) |
| 3DMark Fire Strike | 8,965 | 23,186 (+14221) |
| Geekbench OpenCL | 44,279 | 88,437 (+44158) |
| Geekbench Vulkan | 43,030 | 83,408 (+40378) |
| Normalized score | 55.2 | 70.5 (+15.3) |
Only in component A
ReBAR
In both
CUDA
DLSS
FPS in games (1080p)
| Game | GeForce RTX 2050 | GeForce RTX 2070 | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|
| Assassin´s Creed Valhalla | 21 FPS | 69 FPS | 228.6% (B) |
| Battlefield 5 | ≈ 70 FPS | 92 FPS | 31.4% (B) |
| CS:GO | ≈ 240 FPS | 240 FPS | ≈ |
| Counter-Strike 2 | ≈ 74 FPS | 150 FPS | 102.7% (B) |
| Crysis Remastered | 25 FPS | 71 FPS | 184% (B) |
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 18 FPS | 60 FPS | 233.3% (B) |
| Days Gone | 45 FPS | 101 FPS | 124.4% (B) |
| Death Stranding | 50 FPS | 115 FPS | 130% (B) |
| Dota 2 Reborn | 71 FPS | 127 FPS | 78.9% (B) |
| Escape from Tarkov | 70 FPS | 119 FPS | 70% (B) |
| F1 2021 | 66 FPS | 139 FPS | 110.6% (B) |
| Far Cry 5 | 35 FPS | 103 FPS | 194.3% (B) |
| Final Fantasy XV Benchmark | 25 FPS | 77 FPS | 208% (B) |
| Flight Simulator 2020 | 19 FPS | 49 FPS | 157.9% (B) |
| Fortnite | ≈ 95 FPS | 122 FPS | 28.4% (B) |
| Forza Horizon 4 | ≈ 70 FPS | 121 FPS | 72.9% (B) |
| Forza Horizon 5 | 53 FPS | 85 FPS | 60.4% (B) |
| GTA V | ≈ 140 FPS | 140 FPS | ≈ |
| GTA V | 74 FPS | 127 FPS | 71.6% (B) |
| Gears Tactics | 55 FPS | 115 FPS | 109.1% (B) |
| Hitman 3 | 59 FPS | 124 FPS | 110.2% (B) |
| Hunt Showdown | 54 FPS | 101 FPS | 87% (B) |
| Mafia Definitive Edition | 39 FPS | 90 FPS | 130.8% (B) |
| Metro Exodus | ≈ 35 FPS | 61 FPS | 74.3% (B) |
| Outriders | 34 FPS | 94 FPS | 176.5% (B) |
| Overwatch | ≈ 240 FPS | 240 FPS | ≈ |
| PUBG | ≈ 140 FPS | 140 FPS | ≈ |
| Resident Evil 4 Remake | 17 FPS | 65 FPS | 282.4% (B) |
| Resident Evil Village | 58 FPS | 126 FPS | 117.2% (B) |
| Serious Sam 4 | 32 FPS | 71 FPS | 121.9% (B) |
| Star Wars Squadrons | 111 FPS | 228 FPS | 105.4% (B) |
| The Witcher 3 | ≈ 58 FPS | 122 FPS | 110.3% (B) |
| The Witcher 3 | 47 FPS | 116 FPS | 146.8% (B) |
| Valorant | ≈ 130 FPS | 180 FPS | 38.5% (B) |
| Watch Dogs Legion | 39 FPS | 82 FPS | 110.3% (B) |
| X-Plane 11.11 | 59 FPS | 72 FPS | 22% (B) |
| Yakuza Like a Dragon | 43 FPS | 96 FPS | 123.3% (B) |
Specs from public sources (PassMark, Geekbench). FPS measured at 1080p medium settings. Values for GeForce RTX 2050 are model predictions (≈); GeForce RTX 2070 are direct measurements.
Based on the comparison:
GeForce RTX 2070 wins 18 of the comparable criteria.
The choice depends on your use case.
🤔 How to choose
Universal advice for any use case.
- Reliability vs price: reliability (median 50) ↔ price (median 385.1).
- Weight vs CPU: mobility (median 48) ↔ overall performance (median 49.8).
- Upgradeability vs battery: upgradability (median 50) ↔ battery life (median 2.8).