Component comparison
GeForce RTX 2050 vs GeForce RTX 2060
GeForce RTX 2050 vs GeForce RTX 2060 — detailed GPU comparison: performance, gaming FPS, specifications.
Advantages
A
GeForce RTX 2050
- + Release year (+2)
- + Lithography (nm) (-4 nm)
- + Die size (mm²) (+245 mm²)
- + CUDA cores (+128)
- + RT cores (+2)
- + Energy efficiency (+11.5)
B
GeForce RTX 2060
- + VRAM (GB) (+2 GB)
- + Bandwidth (GB/s) (+224 GB/s)
- + Memory bus (bit) (+128 bit)
- + TGP / TDP (W) (+70 W)
- + Transistors (M) (+2,100M)
- + TMUs (+56)
- + ROPs (+16)
- + Tensor cores (+176)
- + FP32 performance (TFLOPS) (+1.72 TFLOPS)
- + Pixel fill rate (GPixel/s) (+40.80 GPixel/s)
- + Texture fill rate (GTexel/s) (+121.92 GTexel/s)
- + 3DMark Time Spy (+2920)
- + 3DMark Fire Strike (+7366)
- + Geekbench OpenCL (+27133)
- + Geekbench Vulkan (+22828)
- + Normalized score (+11.2)
Detailed spec comparison
| Spec |
Component A
GeForce RTX 2050
|
Component B
GeForce RTX 2060
|
|---|---|---|
| Release year | 2021 (+2) | 2019 |
| VRAM (GB) | 4 GB | 6 GB (+2 GB) |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory clock (MHz) | 1750 MHz | 1750 MHz |
| Bandwidth (GB/s) | 112 GB/s | 336 GB/s (+224 GB/s) |
| Memory bus (bit) | 64 bit | 192 bit (+128 bit) |
| TGP / TDP (W) | 45 W | 115 W (+70 W) |
| Lithography (nm) | 8 nm (-4 nm) | 12 nm |
| Transistors (M) | 8,700M | 10,800M (+2,100M) |
| Die size (mm²) | 200 mm² (+245 mm²) | 445 mm² |
| Base clock (MHz) | 735 MHz | — |
| Boost clock (MHz) | 1245 MHz | — |
| CUDA cores | 2,048 (+128) | 1,920 |
| TMUs | 64 | 120 (+56) |
| ROPs | 32 | 48 (+16) |
| RT cores | 32 (+2) | 30 |
| Tensor cores | 64 | 240 (+176) |
| FP32 performance (TFLOPS) | 4.73 TFLOPS | 6.45 TFLOPS (+1.72 TFLOPS) |
| Pixel fill rate (GPixel/s) | 39.84 GPixel/s | 80.64 GPixel/s (+40.80 GPixel/s) |
| Texture fill rate (GTexel/s) | 79.68 GTexel/s | 201.60 GTexel/s (+121.92 GTexel/s) |
| Energy efficiency | 29.6 (+11.5) | 18.1 |
| PassMark (overall) | — | 14,094 |
| 3DMark Time Spy | 3,221 | 6,141 (+2920) |
| 3DMark Fire Strike | 8,965 | 16,331 (+7366) |
| Geekbench OpenCL | 44,279 | 71,412 (+27133) |
| Geekbench Vulkan | 43,030 | 65,858 (+22828) |
| Normalized score | 55.2 | 66.4 (+11.2) |
Only in component A
ReBAR
Only in component B
ray_tracing
In both
CUDA
DLSS
FPS in games (1080p)
| Game | GeForce RTX 2050 | GeForce RTX 2060 | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|
| Assassin´s Creed Valhalla | 21 FPS | 53 FPS | 152.4% (B) |
| Battlefield 5 | ≈ 70 FPS | 104 FPS | 48.6% (B) |
| CS:GO | ≈ 240 FPS | 240 FPS | ≈ |
| Counter-Strike 2 | ≈ 74 FPS | 150 FPS | 102.7% (B) |
| Crysis Remastered | 25 FPS | 53 FPS | 112% (B) |
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 18 FPS | 60 FPS | 233.3% (B) |
| Days Gone | 45 FPS | 87 FPS | 93.3% (B) |
| Death Stranding | 50 FPS | 92 FPS | 84% (B) |
| Dota 2 Reborn | 71 FPS | 118 FPS | 66.2% (B) |
| Escape from Tarkov | 70 FPS | 121 FPS | 72.9% (B) |
| F1 2021 | 66 FPS | 126 FPS | 90.9% (B) |
| Far Cry 5 | 35 FPS | 96 FPS | 174.3% (B) |
| Final Fantasy XV Benchmark | 25 FPS | 52 FPS | 108% (B) |
| Flight Simulator 2020 | 19 FPS | 42 FPS | 121.1% (B) |
| Fortnite | ≈ 95 FPS | 162 FPS | 70.5% (B) |
| Forza Horizon 4 | ≈ 70 FPS | 108 FPS | 54.3% (B) |
| Forza Horizon 5 | 53 FPS | 100 FPS | 88.7% (B) |
| GTA V | ≈ 140 FPS | 140 FPS | ≈ |
| GTA V | 74 FPS | 95 FPS | 28.4% (B) |
| Gears Tactics | 55 FPS | 93 FPS | 69.1% (B) |
| Hitman 3 | 59 FPS | 105 FPS | 78% (B) |
| Hunt Showdown | 54 FPS | 75 FPS | 38.9% (B) |
| Mafia Definitive Edition | 39 FPS | 60 FPS | 53.8% (B) |
| Metro Exodus | ≈ 35 FPS | 56 FPS | 60% (B) |
| Outriders | 34 FPS | 90 FPS | 164.7% (B) |
| Overwatch | ≈ 240 FPS | 240 FPS | ≈ |
| PUBG | ≈ 140 FPS | 140 FPS | ≈ |
| Resident Evil 4 Remake | 17 FPS | 65 FPS | 282.4% (B) |
| Resident Evil Village | 58 FPS | 95 FPS | 63.8% (B) |
| Serious Sam 4 | 32 FPS | 58 FPS | 81.3% (B) |
| Star Wars Squadrons | 111 FPS | 173 FPS | 55.9% (B) |
| The Witcher 3 | ≈ 58 FPS | 111 FPS | 91.4% (B) |
| The Witcher 3 | 47 FPS | 74 FPS | 57.4% (B) |
| Valorant | ≈ 130 FPS | 223 FPS | 71.5% (B) |
| Watch Dogs Legion | 39 FPS | 66 FPS | 69.2% (B) |
| X-Plane 11.11 | 59 FPS | 56 FPS | +5.4% (A) |
| Yakuza Like a Dragon | 43 FPS | 72 FPS | 67.4% (B) |
Specs from public sources (PassMark, Geekbench). FPS measured at 1080p medium settings. Values for GeForce RTX 2050 are model predictions (≈); GeForce RTX 2060 are direct measurements.
Based on the comparison:
GeForce RTX 2060 wins 16 of the comparable criteria.
The choice depends on your use case.
🤔 How to choose
Universal advice for any use case.
- Reliability vs price: reliability (median 50) ↔ price (median 385.1).
- Weight vs CPU: mobility (median 48) ↔ overall performance (median 49.8).
- Upgradeability vs battery: upgradability (median 50) ↔ battery life (median 2.8).