Component comparison
GeForce MX550 vs Quadro T1000
GeForce MX550 vs Quadro T1000 — detailed GPU comparison: performance, gaming FPS, specifications.
Advantages
A
GeForce MX550
- + Release year (+2)
- + CUDA cores (+256)
- + Energy efficiency (+8.7)
- + Geekbench OpenCL (+218)
- + Geekbench Vulkan (+2644)
- + Normalized score (+3.2)
B
Quadro T1000
- + VRAM (GB) (+2 GB)
- + Memory clock (MHz) (+6500 MHz)
- + Memory bus (bit) (+64 bit)
- + TGP / TDP (W) (+25 W)
- + Boost clock (MHz) (+135 MHz)
- + PassMark (overall) (+2094)
Detailed spec comparison
| Spec |
Component A
GeForce MX550
|
Component B
Quadro T1000
|
|---|---|---|
| Release year | 2021 (+2) | 2019 |
| VRAM (GB) | 2 GB | 4 GB (+2 GB) |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Memory clock (MHz) | 1500 MHz | 8000 MHz (+6500 MHz) |
| Bandwidth (GB/s) | 96 GB/s | — |
| Memory bus (bit) | 64 bit | 128 bit (+64 bit) |
| TGP / TDP (W) | 25 W | 50 W (+25 W) |
| Lithography (nm) | 12 nm | 12 nm |
| Transistors (M) | 4,700M | — |
| Die size (mm²) | 200 mm² | — |
| Base clock (MHz) | 1065 MHz | — |
| Boost clock (MHz) | 1320 MHz | 1455 MHz (+135 MHz) |
| CUDA cores | 1,024 (+256) | 768 |
| TMUs | 32 | — |
| ROPs | 16 | — |
| RT cores | — | — |
| Tensor cores | — | — |
| FP32 performance (TFLOPS) | 2.70 TFLOPS | — |
| Pixel fill rate (GPixel/s) | 21.12 GPixel/s | — |
| Texture fill rate (GTexel/s) | 42.24 GTexel/s | — |
| Energy efficiency | 32.8 (+8.7) | 24.1 |
| PassMark (overall) | 4,419 | 6,513 (+2094) |
| 3DMark Time Spy | 2,470 | — |
| 3DMark Fire Strike | 6,126 | — |
| Geekbench OpenCL | 34,068 (+218) | 33,850 |
| Geekbench Vulkan | 32,369 (+2644) | 29,725 |
| Normalized score | 49.1 (+3.2) | 45.9 |
In both
CUDA
FPS in games (1080p)
| Game | GeForce MX550 | Quadro T1000 | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|
| Battlefield 5 | 45 FPS | 38 FPS | +18.4% (A) |
| CS:GO | 240 FPS | 240 FPS | ≈ |
| Dota 2 | 111 FPS | 113 FPS | 1.8% (B) |
| Far Cry 5 | 45 FPS | 57 FPS | 26.7% (B) |
| GTA V | 140 FPS | 140 FPS | ≈ |
| Metro Exodus | 21 FPS | 32 FPS | 52.4% (B) |
| Overwatch | 240 FPS | 240 FPS | ≈ |
| PUBG | 140 FPS | 140 FPS | ≈ |
Specs from public sources (PassMark, Geekbench). FPS measured at 1080p medium settings.
Based on the comparison:
Components are close in specs.
The choice depends on your use case.
🤔 How to choose
Universal advice for any use case.
- Reliability vs price: reliability (median 50) ↔ price (median 385.1).
- Weight vs CPU: mobility (median 48) ↔ overall performance (median 49.8).
- Upgradeability vs battery: upgradability (median 50) ↔ battery life (median 2.8).