Component comparison
GeForce MX550 vs GeForce RTX 2070
GeForce MX550 vs GeForce RTX 2070 — detailed GPU comparison: performance, gaming FPS, specifications.
Advantages
A
GeForce MX550
- + Release year (+3)
- + Die size (mm²) (+245 mm²)
- + Energy efficiency (+15.8)
B
GeForce RTX 2070
- + VRAM (GB) (+6 GB)
- + Bandwidth (GB/s) (+352 GB/s)
- + Memory bus (bit) (+192 bit)
- + TGP / TDP (W) (+55 W)
- + Transistors (M) (+6,100M)
- + CUDA cores (+1280)
- + TMUs (+112)
- + ROPs (+48)
- + FP32 performance (TFLOPS) (+2.76 TFLOPS)
- + Pixel fill rate (GPixel/s) (+82.58 GPixel/s)
- + Texture fill rate (GTexel/s) (+191.06 GTexel/s)
- + PassMark (overall) (+11644)
- + 3DMark Time Spy (+4191)
- + 3DMark Fire Strike (+17060)
- + Geekbench OpenCL (+54369)
- + Geekbench Vulkan (+51039)
- + Normalized score (+21.4)
Detailed spec comparison
| Spec |
Component A
GeForce MX550
|
Component B
GeForce RTX 2070
|
|---|---|---|
| Release year | 2021 (+3) | 2018 |
| VRAM (GB) | 2 GB | 8 GB (+6 GB) |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory clock (MHz) | 1500 MHz | — |
| Bandwidth (GB/s) | 96 GB/s | 448 GB/s (+352 GB/s) |
| Memory bus (bit) | 64 bit | 256 bit (+192 bit) |
| TGP / TDP (W) | 25 W | 80 W (+55 W) |
| Lithography (nm) | 12 nm | 12 nm |
| Transistors (M) | 4,700M | 10,800M (+6,100M) |
| Die size (mm²) | 200 mm² (+245 mm²) | 445 mm² |
| Base clock (MHz) | 1065 MHz | — |
| Boost clock (MHz) | 1320 MHz | — |
| CUDA cores | 1,024 | 2,304 (+1280) |
| TMUs | 32 | 144 (+112) |
| ROPs | 16 | 64 (+48) |
| RT cores | — | 36 |
| Tensor cores | — | 288 |
| FP32 performance (TFLOPS) | 2.70 TFLOPS | 5.46 TFLOPS (+2.76 TFLOPS) |
| Pixel fill rate (GPixel/s) | 21.12 GPixel/s | 103.70 GPixel/s (+82.58 GPixel/s) |
| Texture fill rate (GTexel/s) | 42.24 GTexel/s | 233.30 GTexel/s (+191.06 GTexel/s) |
| Energy efficiency | 32.8 (+15.8) | 17.0 |
| PassMark (overall) | 4,419 | 16,063 (+11644) |
| 3DMark Time Spy | 2,470 | 6,661 (+4191) |
| 3DMark Fire Strike | 6,126 | 23,186 (+17060) |
| Geekbench OpenCL | 34,068 | 88,437 (+54369) |
| Geekbench Vulkan | 32,369 | 83,408 (+51039) |
| Normalized score | 49.1 | 70.5 (+21.4) |
Only in component B
DLSS
In both
CUDA
FPS in games (1080p)
| Game | GeForce MX550 | GeForce RTX 2070 | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|
| Battlefield 5 | 45 FPS | 92 FPS | 104.4% (B) |
| CS:GO | 240 FPS | 240 FPS | ≈ |
| Counter-Strike 2 | 55 FPS | 150 FPS | 172.7% (B) |
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 21 FPS | 60 FPS | 185.7% (B) |
| Dota 2 | 111 FPS | 127 FPS | 14.4% (B) |
| Far Cry 5 | 45 FPS | 103 FPS | 128.9% (B) |
| Fortnite | 60 FPS | 122 FPS | 103.3% (B) |
| Forza Horizon 4 | 45 FPS | 121 FPS | 168.9% (B) |
| Forza Horizon 5 | 47 FPS | 85 FPS | 80.9% (B) |
| GTA V | 140 FPS | 140 FPS | ≈ |
| Metro Exodus | 21 FPS | 61 FPS | 190.5% (B) |
| Overwatch | 240 FPS | 240 FPS | ≈ |
| PUBG | 140 FPS | 140 FPS | ≈ |
| Resident Evil 4 Remake | 21 FPS | 65 FPS | 209.5% (B) |
| The Witcher 3 | 50 FPS | 122 FPS | 144% (B) |
| Valorant | 95 FPS | 180 FPS | 89.5% (B) |
Specs from public sources (PassMark, Geekbench). FPS measured at 1080p medium settings.
Based on the comparison:
GeForce RTX 2070 wins 17 of the comparable criteria.
The choice depends on your use case.
🤔 How to choose
Universal advice for any use case.
- Reliability vs price: reliability (median 50) ↔ price (median 385.1).
- Weight vs CPU: mobility (median 48) ↔ overall performance (median 49.8).
- Upgradeability vs battery: upgradability (median 50) ↔ battery life (median 2.8).