Component comparison
GeForce MX550 vs GeForce MX350
GeForce MX550 vs GeForce MX350 — detailed GPU comparison: performance, gaming FPS, specifications.
Advantages
A
GeForce MX550
- + Release year (+1)
- + Bandwidth (GB/s) (+40 GB/s)
- + TGP / TDP (W) (+5 W)
- + Lithography (nm) (-2 nm)
- + Transistors (M) (+1,400M)
- + CUDA cores (+384)
- + FP32 performance (TFLOPS) (+1.50 TFLOPS)
- + Energy efficiency (+6.7)
- + PassMark (overall) (+1601)
- + 3DMark Time Spy (+1134)
- + 3DMark Fire Strike (+1755)
- + Geekbench OpenCL (+20956)
- + Geekbench Vulkan (+19000)
- + Normalized score (+18.3)
B
GeForce MX350
- + Memory clock (MHz) (+252 MHz)
- + Die size (mm²) (+68 mm²)
- + Base clock (MHz) (+289 MHz)
- + Boost clock (MHz) (+148 MHz)
- + Pixel fill rate (GPixel/s) (+2.37 GPixel/s)
- + Texture fill rate (GTexel/s) (+4.74 GTexel/s)
Detailed spec comparison
| Spec |
Component A
GeForce MX550
|
Component B
GeForce MX350
|
|---|---|---|
| Release year | 2021 (+1) | 2020 |
| VRAM (GB) | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Memory clock (MHz) | 1500 MHz | 1752 MHz (+252 MHz) |
| Bandwidth (GB/s) | 96 GB/s (+40 GB/s) | 56 GB/s |
| Memory bus (bit) | 64 bit | 64 bit |
| TGP / TDP (W) | 25 W (+5 W) | 20 W |
| Lithography (nm) | 12 nm (-2 nm) | 14 nm |
| Transistors (M) | 4,700M (+1,400M) | 3,300M |
| Die size (mm²) | 200 mm² | 132 mm² (+68 mm²) |
| Base clock (MHz) | 1065 MHz | 1354 MHz (+289 MHz) |
| Boost clock (MHz) | 1320 MHz | 1468 MHz (+148 MHz) |
| CUDA cores | 1,024 (+384) | 640 |
| TMUs | 32 | 32 |
| ROPs | 16 | 16 |
| RT cores | — | — |
| Tensor cores | — | — |
| FP32 performance (TFLOPS) | 2.70 TFLOPS (+1.50 TFLOPS) | 1.20 TFLOPS |
| Pixel fill rate (GPixel/s) | 21.12 GPixel/s | 23.49 GPixel/s (+2.37 GPixel/s) |
| Texture fill rate (GTexel/s) | 42.24 GTexel/s | 46.98 GTexel/s (+4.74 GTexel/s) |
| Energy efficiency | 32.8 (+6.7) | 26.1 |
| PassMark (overall) | 4,419 (+1601) | 2,818 |
| 3DMark Time Spy | 2,470 (+1134) | 1,336 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike | 6,126 (+1755) | 4,371 |
| Geekbench OpenCL | 34,068 (+20956) | 13,112 |
| Geekbench Vulkan | 32,369 (+19000) | 13,369 |
| Normalized score | 49.1 (+18.3) | 30.8 |
In both
CUDA
FPS in games (1080p)
| Game | GeForce MX550 | GeForce MX350 | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|
| Battlefield 5 | 45 FPS | 37 FPS | +21.6% (A) |
| CS:GO | 240 FPS | 240 FPS | ≈ |
| Counter-Strike 2 | 55 FPS | 66 FPS | 20% (B) |
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 21 FPS | 16 FPS | +31.3% (A) |
| Dota 2 | 111 FPS | 83 FPS | +33.7% (A) |
| Far Cry 5 | 45 FPS | 27 FPS | +66.7% (A) |
| Fortnite | 60 FPS | 82 FPS | 36.7% (B) |
| Forza Horizon 4 | 45 FPS | 37 FPS | +21.6% (A) |
| Forza Horizon 5 | 47 FPS | 25 FPS | +88% (A) |
| GTA V | 140 FPS | 140 FPS | ≈ |
| Metro Exodus | 21 FPS | 12 FPS | +75% (A) |
| Overwatch | 240 FPS | 240 FPS | ≈ |
| PUBG | 140 FPS | 140 FPS | ≈ |
| Resident Evil 4 Remake | 21 FPS | 18 FPS | +16.7% (A) |
| The Witcher 3 | 50 FPS | 27 FPS | +85.2% (A) |
| Valorant | 95 FPS | 129 FPS | 35.8% (B) |
Specs from public sources (PassMark, Geekbench). FPS measured at 1080p medium settings.
Based on the comparison:
GeForce MX550 wins 14 of the comparable criteria.
The choice depends on your use case.
🤔 How to choose
Universal advice for any use case.
- Reliability vs price: reliability (median 50) ↔ price (median 385.1).
- Weight vs CPU: mobility (median 48) ↔ overall performance (median 49.8).
- Upgradeability vs battery: upgradability (median 50) ↔ battery life (median 2.8).