Component comparison
GeForce MX450 vs RTX A1000
GeForce MX450 vs RTX A1000 — detailed GPU comparison: performance, gaming FPS, specifications.
Advantages
A
GeForce MX450
Components are close in specs
B
RTX A1000
- + Release year (+4)
- + VRAM (GB) (+6 GB)
- + Memory clock (MHz) (+250 MHz)
- + Bandwidth (GB/s) (+144 GB/s)
- + Memory bus (bit) (+64 bit)
- + TGP / TDP (W) (+25 W)
- + Lithography (nm) (-4 nm)
- + CUDA cores (+1408)
- + TMUs (+8)
- + FP32 performance (TFLOPS) (+3.51 TFLOPS)
- + Energy efficiency (+12.3)
- + PassMark (overall) (+7039)
- + Geekbench OpenCL (+25103)
- + Geekbench Vulkan (+23123)
- + Normalized score (+12.5)
Detailed spec comparison
| Spec |
Component A
GeForce MX450
|
Component B
RTX A1000
|
|---|---|---|
| Release year | 2020 | 2024 (+4) |
| VRAM (GB) | 2 GB | 8 GB (+6 GB) |
| Memory type | GDDR5, GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory clock (MHz) | 1250 MHz | 1500 MHz (+250 MHz) |
| Bandwidth (GB/s) | 80 GB/s | 224 GB/s (+144 GB/s) |
| Memory bus (bit) | 64 bit | 128 bit (+64 bit) |
| TGP / TDP (W) | 25 W | 50 W (+25 W) |
| Lithography (nm) | 12 nm | 8 nm (-4 nm) |
| Transistors (M) | 4,700M | — |
| Die size (mm²) | 200 mm² | — |
| Base clock (MHz) | 1395 MHz | — |
| Boost clock (MHz) | 1575 MHz | — |
| CUDA cores | 896 | 2,304 (+1408) |
| TMUs | 64 | 72 (+8) |
| ROPs | 32 | 32 |
| RT cores | — | 18 |
| Tensor cores | — | 72 |
| FP32 performance (TFLOPS) | 3.23 TFLOPS | 6.74 TFLOPS (+3.51 TFLOPS) |
| Pixel fill rate (GPixel/s) | 50.40 GPixel/s | — |
| Texture fill rate (GTexel/s) | 88.20 GTexel/s | — |
| Energy efficiency | 27.6 | 39.9 (+12.3) |
| PassMark (overall) | 3,714 | 10,753 (+7039) |
| 3DMark Time Spy | 1,900 | — |
| 3DMark Fire Strike | 4,725 | — |
| Geekbench OpenCL | 28,541 | 53,644 (+25103) |
| Geekbench Vulkan | 27,321 | 50,444 (+23123) |
| Normalized score | 44.7 | 57.2 (+12.5) |
Only in component B
DLSS
ReBAR
In both
CUDA
FPS in games (1080p)
| Game | GeForce MX450 | RTX A1000 | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|
| CS:GO | 240 FPS | 240 FPS | ≈ |
| GTA V | 140 FPS | 140 FPS | ≈ |
| Overwatch | 240 FPS | 240 FPS | ≈ |
| PUBG | 140 FPS | 140 FPS | ≈ |
Specs from public sources (PassMark, Geekbench). FPS measured at 1080p medium settings.
Based on the comparison:
RTX A1000 wins 15 of the comparable criteria.
The choice depends on your use case.
🤔 How to choose
Universal advice for any use case.
- Reliability vs price: reliability (median 50) ↔ price (median 385.1).
- Weight vs CPU: mobility (median 48) ↔ overall performance (median 49.8).
- Upgradeability vs battery: upgradability (median 50) ↔ battery life (median 2.8).