Component comparison
GeForce MX450 vs Quadro T1000
GeForce MX450 vs Quadro T1000 — detailed GPU comparison: performance, gaming FPS, specifications.
Advantages
A
GeForce MX450
- + Release year (+1)
- + Boost clock (MHz) (+120 MHz)
- + CUDA cores (+128)
- + Energy efficiency (+3.4)
B
Quadro T1000
- + VRAM (GB) (+2 GB)
- + Memory clock (MHz) (+6750 MHz)
- + Memory bus (bit) (+64 bit)
- + TGP / TDP (W) (+25 W)
- + PassMark (overall) (+2799)
- + Geekbench OpenCL (+5309)
- + Geekbench Vulkan (+2404)
- + Normalized score (+1.2)
Detailed spec comparison
| Spec |
Component A
GeForce MX450
|
Component B
Quadro T1000
|
|---|---|---|
| Release year | 2020 (+1) | 2019 |
| VRAM (GB) | 2 GB | 4 GB (+2 GB) |
| Memory type | GDDR5, GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Memory clock (MHz) | 1250 MHz | 8000 MHz (+6750 MHz) |
| Bandwidth (GB/s) | 80 GB/s | — |
| Memory bus (bit) | 64 bit | 128 bit (+64 bit) |
| TGP / TDP (W) | 25 W | 50 W (+25 W) |
| Lithography (nm) | 12 nm | 12 nm |
| Transistors (M) | 4,700M | — |
| Die size (mm²) | 200 mm² | — |
| Base clock (MHz) | 1395 MHz | — |
| Boost clock (MHz) | 1575 MHz (+120 MHz) | 1455 MHz |
| CUDA cores | 896 (+128) | 768 |
| TMUs | 64 | — |
| ROPs | 32 | — |
| RT cores | — | — |
| Tensor cores | — | — |
| FP32 performance (TFLOPS) | 3.23 TFLOPS | — |
| Pixel fill rate (GPixel/s) | 50.40 GPixel/s | — |
| Texture fill rate (GTexel/s) | 88.20 GTexel/s | — |
| Energy efficiency | 27.6 (+3.4) | 24.1 |
| PassMark (overall) | 3,714 | 6,513 (+2799) |
| 3DMark Time Spy | 1,900 | — |
| 3DMark Fire Strike | 4,725 | — |
| Geekbench OpenCL | 28,541 | 33,850 (+5309) |
| Geekbench Vulkan | 27,321 | 29,725 (+2404) |
| Normalized score | 44.7 | 45.9 (+1.2) |
In both
CUDA
FPS in games (1080p)
| Game | GeForce MX450 | Quadro T1000 | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|
| Battlefield 5 | 49 FPS | 38 FPS | +28.9% (A) |
| CS:GO | 240 FPS | 240 FPS | ≈ |
| Dota 2 | 88 FPS | 113 FPS | 28.4% (B) |
| Far Cry 5 | 34 FPS | 57 FPS | 67.6% (B) |
| GTA V | 140 FPS | 140 FPS | ≈ |
| Metro Exodus | 10 FPS | 32 FPS | 220% (B) |
| Overwatch | 240 FPS | 240 FPS | ≈ |
| PUBG | 140 FPS | 140 FPS | ≈ |
Specs from public sources (PassMark, Geekbench). FPS measured at 1080p medium settings.
Based on the comparison:
Quadro T1000 wins 8 of the comparable criteria.
The choice depends on your use case.
🤔 How to choose
Universal advice for any use case.
- Reliability vs price: reliability (median 50) ↔ price (median 385.1).
- Weight vs CPU: mobility (median 48) ↔ overall performance (median 49.8).
- Upgradeability vs battery: upgradability (median 50) ↔ battery life (median 2.8).