Component comparison

GeForce MX350 vs Quadro T1000

GeForce MX350 vs Quadro T1000 — detailed GPU comparison: performance, gaming FPS, specifications.

Advantages

A GeForce MX350
  • + Release year (+1)
  • + Boost clock (MHz) (+13 MHz)
  • + Energy efficiency (+2.0)
B Quadro T1000
  • + VRAM (GB) (+2 GB)
  • + Memory clock (MHz) (+6248 MHz)
  • + Memory bus (bit) (+64 bit)
  • + TGP / TDP (W) (+30 W)
  • + Lithography (nm) (-2 nm)
  • + CUDA cores (+128)
  • + PassMark (overall) (+3695)
  • + Geekbench OpenCL (+20738)
  • + Geekbench Vulkan (+16356)
  • + Normalized score (+15.1)

Detailed spec comparison

Spec Component A
GeForce MX350
 Component B
Quadro T1000
Release year 2020 (+1) 2019
VRAM (GB) 2 GB 4 GB (+2 GB)
Memory type GDDR5 GDDR5
Memory clock (MHz) 1752 MHz 8000 MHz (+6248 MHz)
Bandwidth (GB/s) 56 GB/s —
Memory bus (bit) 64 bit 128 bit (+64 bit)
TGP / TDP (W) 20 W 50 W (+30 W)
Lithography (nm) 14 nm 12 nm (-2 nm)
Transistors (M) 3,300M —
Die size (mm²) 132 mm² —
Base clock (MHz) 1354 MHz —
Boost clock (MHz) 1468 MHz (+13 MHz) 1455 MHz
CUDA cores 640 768 (+128)
TMUs 32 —
ROPs 16 —
RT cores — —
Tensor cores — —
FP32 performance (TFLOPS) 1.20 TFLOPS —
Pixel fill rate (GPixel/s) 23.49 GPixel/s —
Texture fill rate (GTexel/s) 46.98 GTexel/s —
Energy efficiency 26.1 (+2.0) 24.1
PassMark (overall) 2,818 6,513 (+3695)
3DMark Time Spy 1,336 —
3DMark Fire Strike 4,371 —
Geekbench OpenCL 13,112 33,850 (+20738)
Geekbench Vulkan 13,369 29,725 (+16356)
Normalized score 30.8 45.9 (+15.1)

In both

CUDA

FPS in games (1080p)

Game GeForce MX350 Quadro T1000 Delta
Anno 1800 19 FPS 37 FPS 94.7% (B)
Apex Legends 28 FPS 58 FPS 107.1% (B)
Assassin´s Creed Odyssey 12 FPS 35 FPS 191.7% (B)
Battlefield 5 37 FPS 38 FPS 2.7% (B)
Borderlands 3 17 FPS 38 FPS 123.5% (B)
CS:GO 240 FPS 240 FPS ≈
Call of Duty Modern Warfare 2019 21 FPS 51 FPS 142.9% (B)
Control 12 FPS 31 FPS 158.3% (B)
Dirt Rally 2.0 34 FPS 64 FPS 88.2% (B)
Dota 2 83 FPS 113 FPS 36.1% (B)
Escape from Tarkov 32 FPS 68 FPS 112.5% (B)
F1 2019 28 FPS 61 FPS 117.9% (B)
FIFA 20 46 FPS 160 FPS 247.8% (B)
Far Cry 5 27 FPS 57 FPS 111.1% (B)
Far Cry New Dawn 25 FPS 46 FPS 84% (B)
Farming Simulator 19 49 FPS 86 FPS 75.5% (B)
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark 11 FPS 31 FPS 181.8% (B)
GRID 2019 18 FPS 65 FPS 261.1% (B)
GTA V 140 FPS 140 FPS ≈
GTA V 46 FPS 94 FPS 104.3% (B)
Gears Tactics 30 FPS 58 FPS 93.3% (B)
Ghost Recon Breakpoint 15 FPS 47 FPS 213.3% (B)
Hunt Showdown 21 FPS 44 FPS 109.5% (B)
Kingdom Come: Deliverance 23 FPS 41 FPS 78.3% (B)
Metro Exodus 12 FPS 32 FPS 166.7% (B)
Need for Speed Heat 23 FPS 52 FPS 126.1% (B)
Overwatch 240 FPS 240 FPS ≈
PUBG 140 FPS 140 FPS ≈
Rage 2 15 FPS 46 FPS 206.7% (B)
Rocket League 67 FPS 117 FPS 74.6% (B)
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 25 FPS 40 FPS 60% (B)
Star Wars Jedi Fallen Order 19 FPS 58 FPS 205.3% (B)
The Division 2 20 FPS 36 FPS 80% (B)
The Witcher 3 21 FPS 53 FPS 152.4% (B)
Total War: Three Kingdoms 12 FPS 38 FPS 216.7% (B)
X-Plane 11.11 30 FPS 57 FPS 90% (B)

Specs from public sources (PassMark, Geekbench). FPS measured at 1080p medium settings.

Based on the comparison: Quadro T1000 wins 10 of the comparable criteria. The choice depends on your use case.

🤔 How to choose

Universal advice for any use case.

  • Reliability vs price: reliability (median 50) ↔ price (median 385.1).
  • Weight vs CPU: mobility (median 48) ↔ overall performance (median 49.8).
  • Upgradeability vs battery: upgradability (median 50) ↔ battery life (median 2.8).
All reviews