Component comparison
GeForce MX350 vs GeForce RTX 2070
GeForce MX350 vs GeForce RTX 2070 — detailed GPU comparison: performance, gaming FPS, specifications.
Advantages
A
GeForce MX350
- + Release year (+2)
- + Die size (mm²) (+313 mm²)
- + Energy efficiency (+9.1)
B
GeForce RTX 2070
- + VRAM (GB) (+6 GB)
- + Bandwidth (GB/s) (+392 GB/s)
- + Memory bus (bit) (+192 bit)
- + TGP / TDP (W) (+60 W)
- + Lithography (nm) (-2 nm)
- + Transistors (M) (+7,500M)
- + CUDA cores (+1664)
- + TMUs (+112)
- + ROPs (+48)
- + FP32 performance (TFLOPS) (+4.26 TFLOPS)
- + Pixel fill rate (GPixel/s) (+80.21 GPixel/s)
- + Texture fill rate (GTexel/s) (+186.32 GTexel/s)
- + PassMark (overall) (+13245)
- + 3DMark Time Spy (+5325)
- + 3DMark Fire Strike (+18815)
- + Geekbench OpenCL (+75325)
- + Geekbench Vulkan (+70039)
- + Normalized score (+39.7)
Detailed spec comparison
| Spec |
Component A
GeForce MX350
|
Component B
GeForce RTX 2070
|
|---|---|---|
| Release year | 2020 (+2) | 2018 |
| VRAM (GB) | 2 GB | 8 GB (+6 GB) |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Memory clock (MHz) | 1752 MHz | — |
| Bandwidth (GB/s) | 56 GB/s | 448 GB/s (+392 GB/s) |
| Memory bus (bit) | 64 bit | 256 bit (+192 bit) |
| TGP / TDP (W) | 20 W | 80 W (+60 W) |
| Lithography (nm) | 14 nm | 12 nm (-2 nm) |
| Transistors (M) | 3,300M | 10,800M (+7,500M) |
| Die size (mm²) | 132 mm² (+313 mm²) | 445 mm² |
| Base clock (MHz) | 1354 MHz | — |
| Boost clock (MHz) | 1468 MHz | — |
| CUDA cores | 640 | 2,304 (+1664) |
| TMUs | 32 | 144 (+112) |
| ROPs | 16 | 64 (+48) |
| RT cores | — | 36 |
| Tensor cores | — | 288 |
| FP32 performance (TFLOPS) | 1.20 TFLOPS | 5.46 TFLOPS (+4.26 TFLOPS) |
| Pixel fill rate (GPixel/s) | 23.49 GPixel/s | 103.70 GPixel/s (+80.21 GPixel/s) |
| Texture fill rate (GTexel/s) | 46.98 GTexel/s | 233.30 GTexel/s (+186.32 GTexel/s) |
| Energy efficiency | 26.1 (+9.1) | 17.0 |
| PassMark (overall) | 2,818 | 16,063 (+13245) |
| 3DMark Time Spy | 1,336 | 6,661 (+5325) |
| 3DMark Fire Strike | 4,371 | 23,186 (+18815) |
| Geekbench OpenCL | 13,112 | 88,437 (+75325) |
| Geekbench Vulkan | 13,369 | 83,408 (+70039) |
| Normalized score | 30.8 | 70.5 (+39.7) |
Only in component B
DLSS
In both
CUDA
FPS in games (1080p)
| Game | GeForce MX350 | GeForce RTX 2070 | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|
| Anno 1800 | 19 FPS | 69 FPS | 263.2% (B) |
| Apex Legends | 28 FPS | 128 FPS | 357.1% (B) |
| Assassin´s Creed Odyssey | 12 FPS | 84 FPS | 600% (B) |
| Assassin´s Creed Valhalla | 6 FPS | 69 FPS | 1050% (B) |
| Battlefield 5 | 37 FPS | 92 FPS | 148.6% (B) |
| Borderlands 3 | 17 FPS | 71 FPS | 317.6% (B) |
| CS:GO | 240 FPS | 240 FPS | ≈ |
| Call of Duty Black Ops Cold War | 10 FPS | 81 FPS | 710% (B) |
| Call of Duty Modern Warfare 2019 | 21 FPS | 113 FPS | 438.1% (B) |
| Control | 12 FPS | 68 FPS | 466.7% (B) |
| Counter-Strike 2 | 66 FPS | 150 FPS | 127.3% (B) |
| Crysis Remastered | 9 FPS | 71 FPS | 688.9% (B) |
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 16 FPS | 60 FPS | 275% (B) |
| Cyberpunk 2077 1.0 | 7 FPS | 62 FPS | 785.7% (B) |
| Darksiders III | 31 FPS | 99 FPS | 219.4% (B) |
| Days Gone | 24 FPS | 101 FPS | 320.8% (B) |
| Death Stranding | 17 FPS | 115 FPS | 576.5% (B) |
| Dirt 5 | 7 FPS | 69 FPS | 885.7% (B) |
| Dirt Rally 2.0 | 34 FPS | 117 FPS | 244.1% (B) |
| Dota 2 | 83 FPS | 127 FPS | 53% (B) |
| Escape from Tarkov | 32 FPS | 119 FPS | 271.9% (B) |
| F1 2019 | 28 FPS | 139 FPS | 396.4% (B) |
| F1 2020 | 33 FPS | 146 FPS | 342.4% (B) |
| F1 2021 | 31 FPS | 139 FPS | 348.4% (B) |
| FIFA 20 | 46 FPS | 190 FPS | 313% (B) |
| FIFA 21 | 88 FPS | 211 FPS | 139.8% (B) |
| Far Cry 5 | 27 FPS | 103 FPS | 281.5% (B) |
| Far Cry New Dawn | 25 FPS | 91 FPS | 264% (B) |
| Farming Simulator 19 | 49 FPS | 162 FPS | 230.6% (B) |
| Final Fantasy XV Benchmark | 11 FPS | 77 FPS | 600% (B) |
| Flight Simulator 2020 | 9 FPS | 49 FPS | 444.4% (B) |
| Fortnite | 82 FPS | 122 FPS | 48.8% (B) |
| Forza Horizon 4 | 37 FPS | 121 FPS | 227% (B) |
| Forza Horizon 5 | 25 FPS | 85 FPS | 240% (B) |
| GRID 2019 | 18 FPS | 104 FPS | 477.8% (B) |
| GTA V | 140 FPS | 140 FPS | ≈ |
| GTA V | 46 FPS | 127 FPS | 176.1% (B) |
| Gears Tactics | 30 FPS | 115 FPS | 283.3% (B) |
| Ghost Recon Breakpoint | 15 FPS | 89 FPS | 493.3% (B) |
| Hitman 2 | 20 FPS | 86 FPS | 330% (B) |
| Hitman 3 | 19 FPS | 124 FPS | 552.6% (B) |
| Horizon Zero Dawn | 12 FPS | 85 FPS | 608.3% (B) |
| Hunt Showdown | 21 FPS | 101 FPS | 381% (B) |
| Immortals Fenyx Rising | 10 FPS | 72 FPS | 620% (B) |
| Just Cause 4 | 26 FPS | 96 FPS | 269.2% (B) |
| Kingdom Come: Deliverance | 23 FPS | 97 FPS | 321.7% (B) |
| Mafia Definitive Edition | 19 FPS | 90 FPS | 373.7% (B) |
| Metro Exodus | 12 FPS | 61 FPS | 408.3% (B) |
| Monster Hunter World | 21 FPS | 103 FPS | 390.5% (B) |
| Need for Speed Heat | 23 FPS | 84 FPS | 265.2% (B) |
| Outriders | 22 FPS | 94 FPS | 327.3% (B) |
| Overwatch | 240 FPS | 240 FPS | ≈ |
| PUBG | 140 FPS | 140 FPS | ≈ |
| Rage 2 | 15 FPS | 103 FPS | 586.7% (B) |
| Resident Evil 4 Remake | 18 FPS | 65 FPS | 261.1% (B) |
| Resident Evil Village | 14 FPS | 126 FPS | 800% (B) |
| Rocket League | 67 FPS | 247 FPS | 268.7% (B) |
| Serious Sam 4 | 4 FPS | 71 FPS | 1675% (B) |
| Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 25 FPS | 149 FPS | 496% (B) |
| Star Wars Jedi Fallen Order | 19 FPS | 92 FPS | 384.2% (B) |
| Star Wars Squadrons | 50 FPS | 228 FPS | 356% (B) |
| The Division 2 | 20 FPS | 94 FPS | 370% (B) |
| The Witcher 3 | 27 FPS | 122 FPS | 351.9% (B) |
| The Witcher 3 | 21 FPS | 116 FPS | 452.4% (B) |
| Total War: Three Kingdoms | 12 FPS | 89 FPS | 641.7% (B) |
| Valorant | 129 FPS | 180 FPS | 39.5% (B) |
| Watch Dogs Legion | 13 FPS | 82 FPS | 530.8% (B) |
| X-Plane 11.11 | 30 FPS | 72 FPS | 140% (B) |
| Yakuza Like a Dragon | 20 FPS | 96 FPS | 380% (B) |
Specs from public sources (PassMark, Geekbench). FPS measured at 1080p medium settings.
Based on the comparison:
GeForce RTX 2070 wins 18 of the comparable criteria.
The choice depends on your use case.
🤔 How to choose
Universal advice for any use case.
- Reliability vs price: reliability (median 50) ↔ price (median 385.1).
- Weight vs CPU: mobility (median 48) ↔ overall performance (median 49.8).
- Upgradeability vs battery: upgradability (median 50) ↔ battery life (median 2.8).